Mid-table blues.
By Kitman On Tue 18 Dec 2007 |
Sometimes it’s hard adjusting to changes with someone you know and love well. They used to be a good laugh, you’d hang out together all the time and they could always be relied on to cheer you up when times were hard. And then things go downhill. They get religion. Or they go under the thumb and stay in all the time watching reality TV with their new partner. Or maybe they get into a ‘new healthy lifestyle’. Whatever, they’re just no fun anymore. Well, after another turgid and tedious match, this time at Fulham, it’s time to face facts: our beloved toon has converted to mormonism, shacked up with a control freak and got off the drink and into the jogging pants all in one go. My God, we are as dull as dish water to watch. We’ve been pretty poor since the days of Sir Bobby but we now manage to be both boring and poor. Now that’s progress; who’d have thought winning would be this much fun?!
I should declare at this point that I was watching the match at 6 am on telly with a stinking hangover. As an exile in NZ, you have to get up at brutal times to watch the games live (this match wasn’t so bad, usually they’re on at 2 or 3 in the morning). So I thought maybe it was just me, sitting in a bad mood with a cup of tea wishing I was at the match. Until I saw the coverage of a Fulham fan fast asleep in their seat (that’s one way to silence the home crowd). Then the realisation dawned on me that this was a really bad football match between two anti-footballing teams. I enjoyed the last minute and a half, but that was about it.
There’s no doubt we have some serious and well documented flaws in the team. The defence changes one match to the next and many of the new players have come in from overseas and need time to adapt to each other and the Premier League. Allardyce has a habit of playing players out of position and I noted with amazement that he started Alan Smith again in his correct position as a striker (is that 3 matches in a row?). Also Allardyce has inherited a team subjected to the wrecking crew of Souness and Roeder, and is having to make the most of what he has, which when the second string consisted of such luminaries as Carr, Babayaro, Ameobi, Pattison and Ramage, wasn’t very much at all.
However in my opinion there are two major reasons why we are so dreary to watch. Firstly, our midfield is completely lacking in pace. Allardyce loves Nicky Butt and it’s not hard to see why. He’s an excellent professional, vastly experienced, a good tackler and has good positional sense. He’s also as slow as a clapped out old bus and should be finished as a first choice pick. In the second half I watched in disbelief as Shefki Kuqi – the trundling journeyman sent on to win headers and rough up the defence – outpaced Butt as he ran from midfield. But it’s not just Butt - Geremi, Milner, Emre all lack pace and penetration and Barton looks to me like he’s still not match sharp. We only have one pacey striker and he’s off to the Africa Nations Cup soon. Great. It’s stating the obvious but to be successful in the Premier League you need quick players across the pitch, particularly down the flanks and upfront. Our one quick midfielder with skill and penetration currently plays at left back. That keeps him nicely from doing much attacking then.
Secondly, and perhaps worse still, we lack movement. When we play from the back, there’s nobody getting themselves open; the midfielders look static to me, there’s nobody moving into space. It’s the same with our midfield play, where we play players into trouble or lose the ball, usually because the man on the ball isn’t presented with choices. We give the ball away far too much, leaving players exposed and causing panic. So before long a stream of long balls results from defence or midfield, usually hoofed over the top to our 5 foot 2 striker to contest, with midfield support miles away. Often our players look like bad passers of the ball, but in my opinion it’s usually because their target has made no effort to make the pass easier by getting into space. These are not poor footballers, they’re seasoned internationals to a man, playing in a team with poor movement. You have to put that and the regular loss of possession in midfield down to poor coaching and it needs addressing.
Which brings me on to the tactics and outlook of Sam Allardyce. Why in the second half did we cede the initiative and let them have a go at us, when they were there for the taking? Why was the midfield playing so deep? There was no pace, no width, no creativity, no class. We are incapable of hitting a team on the break. We are incapable of playing through teams by passing the ball. We are afraid of making mistakes and we play percentage football. It was plain our strategy was to keep a clean sheet, defend in numbers and maybe nick something from a set piece, otherwise settle for a goalless draw. We can maybe manage this against a poor poor side like Fulham but we will get stuffed on a regular basis by better teams with that outlook.
The reality is that we are where we deserve to be in the table. We are a really mediocre team. We lack ambition and we lack pace and movement. Allardyce is looking to survive and no more, so we’re doing well as long as we don’t get beaten. In the meantime we have a bunch of cloggers in midfield who run hard and hoof the ball forward, in the hope of winning free kicks, throw-ins and corners. It’s like watching Wimbledon in the days of Dennis Wise and Vinny Jones. Now I know the club’s been in a car crash these last couple of years and I recognise the patient was badly disfigured when surgeon Sam came on the scene, so I’m not expecting our team to resemble a sexy supermodel just yet. But I’d like to see some signs that the surgery is working and things are improving. Instead we’ve got Ugly Betty.
I was hoping for a lot more when Allardyce was appointed. Maybe these are just growing pains and I’m prepared to be patient, but I’d like to see some bloody signs of improvement in the football. Until he gets some pace into the side, some movement, with the aim of scoring a goal or two rather than not conceding, we will continue to be mediocre. We should aspire to more. Geordies love their football, Sam. How about playing some?

Excellent article and sentiments, Kitman. Really.
Allardyce is underplaying his hand, and is not playing to the club’s/squad’s strengths IMO. Given that we are not in any danger as such [of losing or winning anything!], now, for me, would be the time to gamble tactically by nurturing players like N’Zogbia in their best position and blooding Enrique so he can adapt to the league while nothing is riding on it.
Just one other thing: I don’t entirely understand the argument presented that the most successful clubs all have managers who have been there a long time. Both Liverpool and Chelsea chop and change [comparatively regularly], and Arsenal and Man Utd don’t change -because- they have top-class managers, not on principle! You stick with managers that evince a higher calibre of management. If a manager is still making poor tactical substitutions a year into his tenure, the only reason he shouldn’t be dealt with swiftly is if only Roeder or Souness are on the marker as replacement managers.
I understand stability and time is needed to gel, but an intransigent, idiotic tactician who is still an intransigent, idiotic tactician a year into his job [maybe even less] will still be holding the club back in 10, 15 or 20 years.
Sent in on: December 20th, 2007 at 6:37 pm
Thanks for your comments guys
CL - re your first point, what you’re describing is what a relegation threatened team does - keep it tight at the back and nick a goal, and try to get up the table but not losing.
Personally I don’t mind us doing that against the better sides but teams at the bottom like Sunderland, Derby, Fulham etc? I think we should show more ambition than that against weaker opposition.
Also, I’d question Sam’s credentials as a man to deliver clean sheets. I haven’t looked at the stats but weren’t Bolton actually not that good at keeping out the opposition? That was my impression. In addition to which, if he persists on playing Butt and Geremi, I don’t think we’ve got the personnel to deliver clean sheets - our midfield regularly exposes our defence too much by giving the ball away and not getting back quick enough to cover. A better team than Fulham will punish us when our play breaks down. If we’re going to play this way we need to keep hold of the ball far better imo.
I follow your argument CL but I’m not sure if the strategy will work without better defensive midfielders than we have.
Sent in on: December 20th, 2007 at 12:45 am
I can agree with some of what your all are saying, but not all. First of all I agree with that some of the tactics that BSA are using from time to time is extremely questionable but not all. If you look at the Fulham game, we all agree with that it was one most boring games in the premiership so far this season. But look at it this way. We have a crappy away record and we are now hopefully coming back from an incredible slump. I think Sam was thinking like this. Let´s try to create some stability within the team, the best way to do that is to keep a clean sheet. Build from behind as they say. God knows that one thing Newcastle has lacked for many many years now is stability in the defence. Given has been for far to many years now a one man defence.
Well back to my point. What Newcastle should do for the next couple of games now is to focus on just that, keeping a clean sheet. And that might be extremely boring. But only good can come from that. And if that means there will be several 0-0 games for us to watch, then fine by me. I am sick and tired of loosing games with three or up to four goals as we did under Souness and Roeder.
And after that, when we start keeping clean sheets and when we´d managed to get a solid back four. (We for once actually have the players to create just that.) We will be able to look up, not just on the pitch but on the table.
Second, I agree with you all that we need a creative player on the midfield. But I fully understand Chris Mort. Fat Freddie left the club with huge debts and i can understand that Mr. Ashley doesn´t want to spend more money than he already have on the club. So a big name I think is out of the question. And let´s face it, what good have big name signings done us in the past.
What we need to do is to find our own Elano. Someone who is a great player but isn´t a big name who comes for the big paycheck, because for what other reason would he come to Newcastle? Maybe because of the big games in Europe that we play so often. Come on let´s face it.
This area is somewhere I trust Big Sam. We all know that he has great insight in the transfer market and is extremly good at getting good players cheap. Maybe Arsahvin who knows but as Big Sam keep on saying we need quality players.
So my point is let´s give Sam some time and hopefully we manage to get a European spot for next season and if things are looking the same a year from now which hopefully they don´t. Then let´s get someone else!
Sent in on: December 19th, 2007 at 10:32 pm
Firstly good article. Yes at the moment we are not playing the most attractive football but i think Derby on sunday well show just how good we are against well already doomed and poor quality opposition. This gives the team an opportunity to show good..attacking football unlike the mediocre display on saturday and win comfortably by at least 2 goals. My only fear is that BSA loses the plot and we go down 1-0 like that horrible night last season against sheffield.
Sent in on: December 19th, 2007 at 9:02 pm
Thanks for the article Kitman, I’m also an exiled Geordie at the moment living in Latvia. Like you I’m watching the games remotely but seem to be of the same opinion as you and most of the others. I think Sam has managed to turn around what is going to be a repetitive situation unless we give him some substantial funds to bring in real class in January and the summer.
It reads that Chris Mort has already cleared the ground for a January window of little activity on our behalf. That coupled with six weeks minus four first team regulars I think we are about as high as we are going to get. The worrying thing is all the teams around us seem to be prepared to continue investing in players which can only increase the gap between ourselves and the teams around and above us.
Personally I don’t think Sam is the right man for us but if we have to stick with him give him some kitty to compete for some class that we are desperate for.
1-0 on Saturday for me, 91st minute winner off someones hoop…
Sent in on: December 19th, 2007 at 8:01 pm
Does playing ugly actually increase our chances of winning anything?
The problem with adopting a ‘winning is all that matters’ approach is what happens if you don’t win. Not winning something is bad, not winning something and playing garbage football is far worse.
Sent in on: December 19th, 2007 at 6:14 pm
To be honest, I’d rather win something with little or no flair in our team, grind out wins & draws week in week out, and then finally build on those foundations than play with excitement and brilliant football and lose.
We have a transitional period going on at the club, we are finally feeling we are moving in the correct direction.
Yes we need a playmaker in midfield and yes BSA has played some quite strange tactics, but not one person who watched our last 3 performances (before Fulham) and could not say that we look a far better ‘more up for it’ team than last season.
I just hope we give Sam time…all this chopping and changing has not worked. Look at Manure & TheArse (OK Wenger won trophies in his first season) but stability is what is needed right now, not bloody knee jerk reactions.
Boring football is not what we want to watch, but I’ll bloody put up with it if it means we win a trophy!
Sent in on: December 19th, 2007 at 11:22 am
Well, we don’t need a “name”… Just someone who can pass a ball forwards ideally…..
And isn’t Motta just an average anchor man who can’t get in Barce’s “B” team? Surely we have enough distinctly average centre midfielders.
Sent in on: December 19th, 2007 at 10:01 am
So,we need a playmaker AND a name, according to Mike A? Hell, just splash the cash and get Thiago Motta from Barca!!!
Sent in on: December 18th, 2007 at 10:01 pm
Rafael Van Der Vart would be a good one…. And attainable in my opinion.
Sent in on: December 18th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
Alex is spot on - We need to go all out to land a playmaker this January.
As I said in the Fulham post-match stuff, Daniel Carvalho of CSKA Moscow could be an option. Diego would be a sensational option, sadly I’ve heard whispers he’s off to Real Madrid.
Without a playmaker, we just seem to be a poor scrappy mid-table team.
Sent in on: December 18th, 2007 at 2:37 pm
Great article. Our midfield does lack pace, and you have to release that our penetrative players have all gone; Dyer, Solano, Robert, etc. Our only hope is the return of Duff, so hopefully he can find some form of old.
More worryingly for me, and the explanation for our boring play, is that all our midfield are defensive midfielders; Geremi, Butt and Barton. If we had managed to get Riquelme as the rumours had suggested, we could have been a great team, with the creativity left to him, our defensive wall of midfielders would turn into a plus not a minus. With him back in South America, we can still go for Andrei Arshavin as a playmaker, as we need our own Elano desperately, perhaps Diego from Bremen is an option.
Sent in on: December 18th, 2007 at 1:24 pm
Thank you at last somebody else can see why i have been for a very long time about the state of our team!
i agree with everything being written but i think this will continue to happen as long as BSA is in charge.
Sent in on: December 18th, 2007 at 11:49 am