Archie’s Alternative Assessment - Middlesbrough Mediocrity
By Archie Brand On Tue 24 Oct 2006 |
In 1882 The Sporting Times published an obituary that stated that English Cricket had died, the body would be cremated, and the ashes would be taken to Australia. Cricket fans out there will instantly recognise this as the story explaining the origin of The Ashes series of tests.
The actual Ashes are reputed to be something along the lines of a burnt stump or bails, and they are housed in a small terracotta urn.
I suggest we do something similar in memory of football at St. James Park.
I don’t particularly care too much where these “Toon Ashes†end up, and I’m not bothered about the little terracotta urn, but I do think something significant should definitely be cremated, and I nominate Freddy Shepherd.
And if I was Glen Roeder I’d be off down Eldon Square looking at asbestos underpants.
I watched the ‘boro game twice. The second time straight after the first.
You know what it’s like when people get so wrapped up in the minutiae that they can’t see the big picture - well I think that’s what we’re dealing with at the Toon.
Plot or Marbles - what should they look for first? They’ve obviously lost both.
I know I’ve harped on about this before but sometimes, particularly when you are dealing with a lack of cranial absorption or similar, you have to repeat yourself. I apologise to the rest of you.
Here we go….. again
Roeder has either taken, or set up to be taken, his last 3 teams on that mystery tour that is called “relegationâ€. To be completely accurate when I say “last 3 teams†I should really say “every team he has ever managedâ€. Accuracy is everything in journalism.
He was only given the job because of a miraculous recovery when he took over as caretaker from Souness. Oh, sorry! In the interests of accuracy I should mention that he was accompanied in this achievement by a certain Mr Shearer.
Freddy Shepherd had lots to say in the months leading up to the end of last season, but the gist of it all was along the following lines;
1 We will not rush into appointing a new manager,
2 We will bring in a World Class Manager,
3 Whoever we appoint it is important that he is acceptable to
the fans.
Fred saw a way out of statement number 2 by ensuring that statement number 3 was met.
We’re a fickle bunch, bending with the prevailing wind. It doesn’t even have to be a wind. A fart is often enough to nudge us on our way. One minute we want to have your babies, the next we want your nuts on a skewer.
So at the end of the day, not only does it get dark, but this is all your fault, Toon Army!
Well guess what. End of October, nine games played, seven points on the board and sitting in 16th position. Even at this early stage I would have to say that the Champions League is looking a little bit of a stretch.
So what’s changed? Are we suffering from a terminal lack of Shearer? I would suggest that’s more than likely.
Yes we’ve played a couple of good teams, but even against the bad ones we didn’t exactly shine. And there are more good teams out there to play again.
What else can I add to this fuel of discontent?
Oh yes, how about this?
You don’t have to be a football management guru to come to the conclusion that the assistant/caretaker manager of a team that escaped relegation on the last day of one season, then finally went down the next, is probably not the best choice when it comes to putting together a highly motivated rescue mission brimming with talent, confidence and achievement.
Enter Nigel Pearson. Anyone for a job as Deck Chair Attendant on the Titanic?
Let’s not kid ourselves - big clubs can, and do, go down.
Is it a good thing, or a bad thing that our best central defence combination appears to be 2 kids just out of the academy?
Don’t get me wrong - I think Taylor and Ramage are the Mutts Nuts, but it says something about our management that these kids are the best we have.
Sibierski. He has actually put in some good performances and in my opinion is a better player than Ameobi. But again, stripping it all bare, we took a player who couldn’t get a game at Man City and he’s outplaying “two-touchâ€, who, if you believe all the hype, was being pushed at one point as a possible replacement for big Al as the Great Geordie Hope.
Remember Roeder telling Ameobi “We’re not looking for someone to replace you, we’re looking for someone to play alongside you�
That should have been a clue as to where they were aiming. We really should concentrate more.
I usually refer to Ameobi as “two-touchâ€, but taking into consideration his apparent inability to remain perpendicular to the pitch I’m extending it to “two-touch, Oops!â€
OK, remember what I said about Sibierski? Man City reject, playing better than Ameobi? If we are so short of quality forwards how the hell do we end up with Rossi sitting on the bench week after week?
Rooney said “Guiseppe Rossi is the best finisher at Man Unitedâ€.
Alex Ferguson said “I’m sending him to Newcastle to get some first team experienceâ€.
Glen Roeder said “OK, 83 minutes gone, we’re 2 - 0 down - on you go son!â€
The loan signing of Rossi was on a par with mugging Chelsea for Duff as being a stroke of genius.
Sticking him to the bench indefinitely kinda dampens that initial rush don’t you think?
As for bringing in Bernard - he was one of our better players when he was here last, and I admit to being excited at the time, but 2 months later he’s still not match fit. Sounds like we bought an old Peugeot and it didn’t get a warranty.
Martins looks to have some serious potential, but hardly fits into the bracket “proven in the Premiership!†that Roeder was adamant about.
The previous paragraphs are a typical example of the monotonous repetition that appears unhindered on the internet. In my opinion it just happens to be accurate. If you’ve read my comments on the above before, then it means you read at least 2 of my articles and thank you very much. If you are ever in Bahrain look me up and pop round for a beer.
On to the game.
Harper - 7
Played well but there’s something inherently wrong about playing an injured player, knowing that you may have to replace him at some time during the match. He looked to be a little hindered at times but did the business. Well done son.
Carr - 6
Did OK again but his passing let him down. Him? Maybe I should have said “usâ€. He always looks shagged to me. Maybe he’s still a bit unfit.
Moore - 7
Not bad for an old ‘un. Anyone who is reported to have missed an international match as a result of having a couple of bevvies is fine by me. Where did we get him from? Why did they say he’d been released? Do we care?
When I reached the pinnacle of my playing career the half time whistle heralded a wide range of activities ranging from hair of the dog, through throwing up and on to a cocktail of alka seltzer and aspirin. I was going to add lighting up, but this wouldn’t be strictly accurate as a number of players smoked all the way through the game.
OK. Ignore the allegations - seriously cool player, as good as we’ve had for a while.
Taylor - 7
Coped well but instead of depending on his ability seems to be heading for the “Dark Side†I would like to see clubs introduce significant fines for blatant attacks on the opposition, such a Taylor’s continued use of the elbow. Maybe if he had the cost of a new BMW deducted from his salary over a period of a few months, he’d think twice. Of course subtle attacks on the opposition and blatant ones on your own players are perfectly acceptable. (Oh give me a break! It was a joke!) Cracking save off the line that just about makes up for the fact that he was left stranded by his mark.
I’ll take a break here and pose a question.
On the PGA golf tours players are paid to use manufacturer’s equipment. It gets the kit out there on TV and all of us hapless punters go out in our droves and buy it thinking it will make a difference to our game. I bought a Taylor Made R7 driver a couple of years ago and it made a huge difference. I was hitting my drives a good twenty five yards further into the trees. But I digress.
Is it possible that the Oxford English Dictionary does the same thing with commentators?
On the coverage that I watch everyone has started saying “just aboutâ€, but in my opinion in the wrong context. If a keeper pushes a ball around the post they say he has “just about saved itâ€. If the winger fleeces a defender he has “just about got round him†- even though he obviously has. Is it just me with my limited perception or did “just about†used to mean “almost†or “not quiteâ€?
I’m all for the simplification of the English language to encourage more efficient communication. Confusing the issue doesn’t do any of us any good.
The old Batman TV series with Burt West and Adam Ward demonstrated this superbly with scene where Batman solved one of the usual bizarre clues by pronouncing the word “ghoti†as “fishâ€.
Pretty straight forward really.
“gh†= “F†as in “coughâ€
“o†= “i†as in “womenâ€
“ti†= “sh†as in “demolitionâ€
Sign up for Archie’s Campayne For Thu Simplifikayshun Ov Thu Ingglish Langwaj. Spell it as you say it.
It’s my ambition to simplify the language to the point where, one day, in the unlikely event that it was required, even Mackems could fill in their own Season Ticket Application Forms, or taking it a step further even Scousers could fill in their own Applications for Bail.
Now what was my point?
Not a clue. Plot or Marbles?
Ramage - 8
Straight out of Kindergarten and producing the goods. Give him a few years and we should seriously consider thinking about buying him back.
Milner - 7
Continues to show his ability, but at times it seems limited to lesser opposition. It’s a good thing we didn’t let him go in the summer - we’ll get loads more than 4 mil for him in January. It says a lot for the lad that he is playing so well following the transfer cock-up with Villa. He’s obviously a solid individual.
Parker - 8
Well on the way to establishing himself in the England squad. There isn’t another midfielder in the country that gets box to box like him. He’s as likely to be banging in a shot one end as he is clearing one off the line at the other. And in an unusual stroke of luck for us he normally gets it the right way round.
Butt - 6
Not doing an awful lot in my book. He’s onto a loser trying to stand in for Emre but needs to do more. More of everything really.
Duff - 7
Started to play again - more mobile and showing us what he can do. A bit like Milner, Duff doesn’t shine so much against the big boys. Maybe it just needs a bit of time, but if he can perform well against the “lesser†14 clubs in the league I suppose we could accept that.
Sibierski - 6
Has much better movement into space than Ameobi, and in my opinion better distribution too. Not brilliant in the air and still not the holding target man that Roeder insists on trying to play. Not Sibierski’s fault. I would like to think he played on merit, and not just to rest Ameobi.
Martins - 7
Gets about and causes problems. His finishing is still not quite there but it can’t be far off now. Has the required aggressiveness for his height and unlike some I could mention (and already have) can actually get off the ground when he jumps.
Tips on jumping for professional footballers
1 Up is the preferred direction. (Are you reading this Shola?)
2 Try to aim and time the jump to coincide at some point with the trajectory and arrival of the ball. (St James’ Park, Bolton, Steven Carr. See if you can make a sentence…)
3 Jumping from underneath an opponent makes contact with the ball difficult.
4 To promote power and accuracy the front of the head is recommended. Not the top, not the side, not the back. Anywhere on the front. Nose, mouth and chin are acceptable but not recommended.
5 If your opponent is familiar with hint number 2, then moving behind your opponent to jump is not likely to yield positive results. (These are not secrets - other teams are aware of them) Maybe you should ask him before the game if he knows about it. Do it when you are doing that “fair play, shaking hands†shite, or better still, during the minute’s silence if they have one.
More enforced pointless rituals are just what the game needs.
Shaking hands before the game is all fine and dandy, and it seems to have had a substantial effect on player behaviour on the pitch. Right up to the point where the Ref blows his whistle and the game begins. As for the minutes silence - I always had a problem with a bunch of nobodies (or even anybodies) telling people to whom they must pay respect and how it must be
done.
Following the tribute to George Best it is now acceptable to clap and cheer. Maybe in a few years the traditional minute’s silence will be interpreted as 30 seconds of verbally abusing opposition fans slightly less than normal.
6 Wrapping any part of your body around an opponent while jumping will almost certainly result in some kind of negative result (in the Premiership at least!) If it results in a telephone number you need to take up a different sport.
Ameobi - 5
Didn’t do much at all. His most memorable moment was a side footed effort from outside the box was lucky to even make it as far as the keeper. He didn’t so much save it as anticipate it’s arrival.
N’Zogbia - 5
Didn’t even have enough time to figure out which way he was kicking. No doubt he was just as pissed off as we were.
Roeder - 4
We never looked like scoring at all in the second half, why did it take the Yak’s goal in the 85th minute to bring N’Zogbia off the bench after 88? Did Roeder forget that he had subs available?
Do we still have Rossi, or has he packed his bags and gone back to Manchester?
While we got away with it again, why were we playing with an injured keeper? He didn’t look to have full mobility. During one shot that went narrowly wide he appeared to fall towards the ball rather than dive. Could he have done better with the goal if fully fit? Just a question.
You may have guessed that I haven’t taken to Roeder. He doesn’t have the experience and record we need, and he’s not turning out to be a Kevin Keegan either.
What is your lingering recollection of Mick McCarthy McMackem as manager of Sunnulun?
Could it be how he stood in front of the cameras week after week and announced to the world that “we deserved better, we didn’t get the breaks, we were unlucky�
He could hardly stand there saying “we got stuffed, we were crap, it’s what we expected†because that would probably have taken him out of the running for the “Motivator Of The Month†award, but there were times when you just knew that was
what he was thinking.
Any of this sound familiar?
Archie Brand
Simmering
Bahrain

As Chris suggests - maybe we can find a role for Titus that doesn’t involve him putting the fear of god into his fellow defenders.
If, as has been suggested many times, Titus is good for 95% of the match, and Roeder insist on trying to play the big target man up front, then why not try him instead of Ameobi? He can jump in the general direction of upwards, he doesn’t fall down very much, he successfully heads the ball twenty odd timea a game, and he’s actually got a good solid boot on him. Hell, in my book he’s 4-0 up on Shola already.
The odd nap attack will only serve to confuse the other defence and we could even work that to our advantage in so far as they might get complacent.
Glenn - put him on the bench and one game where there’s nothing to lose bring him and try him.
Damn, this could work!!!!!
Sent in on: October 26th, 2006 at 4:38 pm
Archie,
I recently got two kittens & was trying to think of names for them. Obviously I wanted to call them Shearer & Beardsley (or maybe Gazza). My wife was having none of it & I just felt it wasn’t right to call cats Alan & Peter (or Paul).
As a regular reader of your work here on N.O. I’m well aware your dog’s called Titus. I think it really works as a pets name & after running through the team sheet I figured that Titus & Shola were the best names… but I just couldn’t do it. How can I name my pets after people that I’d rather never pulled on the black & white jersey again? It would be fine if I thought either had a future at the club, but my heart tells me (my head knows better) that surely it won’t be more then 12 months before both are just unpleasant memories from the past!
Shola: I just never saw the point of him. When LuaLua left for Portsmouth, I thought we let the wrong one of the two “upcoming” youngsters go & I didn’t rate LuaLua that highly at the time either. I’m bored of statements at the start of each season saying that he’ll get 20+ goals this season. Shola needs to move on to Championship football.
Titus: I always had hope for him, call it a soft spot. For 85 minutes of a match he can be the equal of any defender in the Premiership. Then for no apparent reason he would just get it all wrong & sadly for a keeper or defender, when you get it wrong the team often concedes. I feel that Titus has now had far more then his fair share of chances & can no longer be trusted to play centre back for us.
I have an idea though for how we might get more from Titus then letting him rot. With our apparent shortage of fit/worthy full-backs, why not keep Ramage in the middle (I doubt I’m the only one who thinks he has been very dependable each time he plays in his best position) & then give bramble a go as full back. He’ll surely do less damage out there & is possibly better going forward then Ramage? I’ve seen evidence he can use both feet, he is capable of decent passing (we’d see less long distance punts with him further up the pitch) & he’s got a little pace on occasion. Also opposition strikers shouldn’t be able to peal off wide to win an easy header (see: Carr at Bolton).
Hope you see my/any logic in that idea?
As for Freddy, I was disappointed but not surprised to see Sir John Hall defending Fred & basically saying that fans have no right to complain as both he & the current chairman have always financially backed the managers & then went on to say that some of the players bought by those managers were not up to par. I read that as, if the manager appoints enough rubbish players he gets the sack. I was left thinking ‘how many rubbish managers does a chairman have to appoint to also get the sack?”
Finally, something else you said… While I’m bitterly disappointed that a club of Newcastle alleged size has to loan in players, I’m in full support now of giving Rossi every available second of football he can get in our shirt & hopefully ManU will think about expanding his stay till the summer.
Chris
(Sorry that was a bit longer then I intended)
Sent in on: October 26th, 2006 at 4:23 pm
Chris,
Any suggestion that I would happy to see the back of the three individuals that you mentioned would be totally inappropriate at this moment in time, not to mention spot on.
On the players - I think I’ve made it fairly obvious that I’m not chairman of either fan club.
I look at what the players bring to the team and if nothing immediately jumps out and hits me then that’s good enough (or bad enough) for me.
Amble and Bramble quite simply just haven’t done the biz.
If anyone wants to suggest that Bramble earned his place solely because of the goal he scored against Chelsea that “got us into Europe”, I would suggest they look at how many points he lost us before that, and his effect on the team performance and morale as a whole. When the Manager is saying we made some defensive errors, what are the players saying? And I bet it’s not nearly so generous!
Maybe we could have been looking at top four instead of seven.
As I’ve said before about “Two Touch - Oops”, if he has 5 goals how many could a half decent striker have had?
As for Fred. Well - what can you say?
He should be out on the pitch with the lads judging by the number of games he’s been playing.
I don’t think these Fat Cat executives appreciate what a team like Newcastle United means to some of the fans. How can they?
Does Fred realise what effect his farting around with transfers actually has on the footsoldiers of the Toon Army? The frustration and depression? The drinking?
How many household pets get a good kicking because of these guys?
Cheers Chris -you got me started and you know I don’t have an “off” button.
On the bright side - Dyer played last night and Roeder finally decided to let Rossi play.
There’s hope for us yet!
Sent in on: October 26th, 2006 at 10:15 am
Thanks for responding to my comments, Archie. I still don’t wholly agree with you - but i understand more clearly what you mean. I’ll have to start reading a few more of your articles… the two or three of which i’ve read in the past have been good reads.
Cheers.
Sent in on: October 25th, 2006 at 6:06 pm
Paul,
As you can see from my previous reply to Yorkie-Geordie (imagine the conflict there!) I really do like a trier.
I think Ramage is seriously underated. Lets not forget that thanks to the management’s last minute attempts at bargain hunting Ramage has tried everything from selling programs to parking cars. He gets in there and does it, and doesn’t do too bad. He gives his all.
Milner does seem to be stuck in a bit of a rut in so far as his repertoire can at times be limited to running wide on the right then just banging the ball over. If he could just add a bit of variety to his armoury he’d be brilliant. Maybe he should take a look at N’Zogbia.
But again it’s his effort that impresses me the most. That’s why these two get the higher marks.
As for Parker, I was concerned when they made him Captain, but it doesn’t seem to have affected his game. Quite the opposite in fact.
Maybe we’d be in a different position if a few more of our players had their work ethic. It’s not like were lacking talent.
Sent in on: October 25th, 2006 at 5:59 pm
I think overall Archie your marks are a pretty fair relfection. I think you’re being a little kind to Ramage, and certainly Milner who puts in the ffort as you say but rarely follows it up with an end product of note, and maybe a little harsh on Butt, who I thought had quite a decent game actually.
You’re spot on about Parker though, he’s the one shining light at the moment.
Sent in on: October 25th, 2006 at 12:45 pm
In response to your comments, Yorkie - Geordie,
yes you might think that some of the marks are a bit high, and somee people might think some of them are a bit low but I generally don’t base my marks on the result, goals for or goals against - that’s why I call it an alternative assessment.
I gave Duff and Milner sevens mainly because of the effort they put in and their movement on and off the ball. Milner is fairly consistent at the moment aswell. I think Duff is improving and having more of a go at defences.
Parker is really impressing me at the moment - all over the place, box to box, and his workrate was phenomenal.
I have no problem giving high marks if we lose, or if the team in general plays poorly.
There are times when the whole team plays well but we don’t win. There have been times when we were crap and took points we didn’t deserve.
In my book there are no set rules - it’s all subjective - otherwise one match report is all you’d ever need or want.
Next time you watch the lads play why not put your own report together and send it in. See how it compares to others.
Cheers - Archie
Sent in on: October 25th, 2006 at 12:07 pm
Enjoyed reading your work as always Archie. I agree with just about everything you put (again). How happy would you be to see the back of Shola, Titus & Freddy by next summer?
Sent in on: October 25th, 2006 at 11:53 am
I am speaking from a fairly neutral point of view, as i didn’t see the match, nor the highlights. I couldn’t really face watching Match of the Day, knowing that a pathetic result like this was just going to be emphasised by the Brummie stunner at the head of the programme.
Anyhow… your marks for the players seem unrealistically high, considering that this is a team who has embarassingly just lost to an incredibly average Middlesbrough side, arguably with a worse manager than ours.
Surely the likes of Duff, Milner, Parker cannot command sevens and eights, when you consider that we didn’t even score…
Sent in on: October 25th, 2006 at 12:31 am
I cannot STAND N’zogbia being on the bench. It’s ridiculous. Probably one of the most consistent players last season (along with Solano, and where is he? aha, yes). Also agree completely with your Ameobi ‘comments’, I would even prefer if he gave Luque a decent run instead of him. If Luque has been playing well for the reserve game and the Catalan game then give him a shot against Portsmouth aswell as Rossi and maybe even Bernard.
Sent in on: October 24th, 2006 at 6:07 pm
Excellent read Archie. I didn’t see the game so can’t comment on your ratings but as ever your articles are a good diversion and this one is no different. Keep up the good work entertaining, confusing and providing the N.O community with something to chew over.
Sent in on: October 24th, 2006 at 4:37 pm