What the hell are you playing at Glenn?
By HTT On Mon 30 Oct 2006 |
Albert Luque - the Spanish superstar signed at a huge cost of £9.5m and brought to Tyneside to create and score goals. It hasn’t quite happened for him, however, has it?
In only his 2nd game for us he picked up a bad injury, a tear to the hamstring that kept him out for a few months, and when he did return he was rushed back by Souness. In the little he played under the Scot he generally looked uninterested, not surprisingly.
While many fans took offence to that I personally didn’t hold him to any blame because he wasn’t the only one lacking any heart under Souness and given he was new to our club and from foreign shores, not to mention the fact he wasn’t fully fit, I excused his lackluster performances and perceived lazy on-field attitude.
As far as I was concerned under Souness our more skillful players were always going to underperform and shirk away from his unique brand of the beautiful game which was to run yourself into the ground, fly into tackles and generally kick your way to the final whistle.
Compare Parker’s performances to Solano’s under Souness and who stood out? The grafter not the technician.
The likes of Luque were brought up and schooled to PLAY the game not fight and scrap and while I acknowledge foreign players do need to find a balance between those two extremes if they want to succeed in the Premiership, it takes more than a few games to do that which is what was being asked of Luque at the time.
Now that he has been here over 12 months, however, he should be more than adjusted. Only he hasn’t been getting the games and under Roeder it doesn’t look like he ever will!
In a season where we are short up front here we have a player who is renowned for scoring and creating goals, albeit in La Liga, but he’s spent more minutes warming up than playing football.
Yet is Luque worse than those already picked by Glenn to create and score us goals?
The stats say no, in the 2 starts (YES TWO) Luque has made under Roeder he has 2 goals to his name which is a better strike to games ratio than anyone in the side, now contrast that to Duff’s 1 goal in 11 starts - another player bought to create and score goals… One keeps getting selected the other keeps getting ignored!
In the 18 competitive games we’ve played this season Luque has featured in just 7 of them, starting 2 (InterToto Cup) and coming on as sub in 5 other games. More tellingly he has been an unused sub 4 times. For a club desperate for options up front this is flagrant misuse of a player who cost us a lot of money, one that can’t be defended.
If Roeder doesn’t trust him to do the business then why put him on the bench at all?
If Roeder doesn’t like what he sees in training, again why put him on the bench and why praise him for his efforts in training which he has done a number of times now?
If he isn’t fully fit which Roeder has alluded to in the past why is he anywhere near the first-team and if Luque isn’t fully fit, then what the hell is Shola Ameobi who keeps getting selected despite the whole world knowing he needs a new hip?
Luque should be a new manager’s wet dream; here we have a clearly talented individual who cost a lot of money but who isn’t or hasn’t produced the goods.
Any manager worth their salt would want to get a hold of that player and get him producing - all good managers do that.
Keegan did it with a whole host of players as did Sir Bobby Robson. Fergie does it at Man Utd, Wenger at Arsenal and Benitez at Liverpool just to use a few examples.
Hell, even Souness couldn’t wait to work with perennial waster Kieron Dyer - promising to straighten him out and to get him delivering.
And to be fair when Dyer was fit he was often one of our more productive players under the Scot. Although that wasn’t too difficult a task given most weren’t even trying at times. The point still stands though.
With Roeder there has been no real concerted effort to use him at all, at any time and at any stage this season. The two times he has been used he has delivered 2 goals.
Just why Luque isn’t getting more minutes on the pitch is mystifying to me given our lack of options up front, our injury troubles and our goalscoring issues.
I’m not surprised that when he does get the odd minute here or there he doesn’t show any real feeling for the club or doesn’t run his socks off, who would?
He’s not a Geordie and while its easy to ask for blood considering what they get paid, lets be real here. Wages have nowt to do with it if you’re unhappy.
It doesn’t matter what line of work you’re in you aren’t going to love your boss, or your employer much less the job you’re paid to do if you yourself aren’t wanted.
The “he doesn’t even try” debate is a moot one anyway because he’s hardly played and when he has, how hard must it be for him to lift himself knowing there is little chance of winning over a manager who serially keeps overlooking him despite a shortage of attacking options up front, mounting injury casualties in that department and a growing inability to find the back of the net?
When we are coasting (Pompey 3-0) he doesn’t get used.
When we have just one recognised striker fit to play (Rossi at the weekend) he doesn’t get used.
And when we are badly in need of a goal like at the weekend….
Play him Glenn, he can do no worse than those firing blanks, running about like headless chickens or sending crosses out for a goal-kick that are currently getting in ahead of him. They may sweat more and look more interested but they are as much use to us as Luque warming up is.

When Luque has actually been given a chance he has produced. I can’t think what Roeder has against him. Is it because he thinks he’s lazy, because look at Le Tissier. He was lazy, but kept Southampton up by himself most of the time. Play Luque, please Roeder!
Sent in on: November 5th, 2006 at 1:52 am
I’m a Toon fan from Iceland. I totally agree that Luque should be a regular first team player. He has the talent but he hasn’t got the opportunities. In his first game against the Red Devils he was pretty good and created a lot of chances. I want Luque in the first 11 team!
Sent in on: November 1st, 2006 at 12:45 pm
All in all, I have only one conclusion that GR is turning into another GS! Had a honeymoon period when taking over, then losing the plot with having personal problems with certain players. (For GS, it’s Laurent Robert and Craig Bellamy. For GR, it’s the man of the topic here)
With the amount of talent we have in the squad, we really should not be lingering at the spot we are at right now. Come on, GR, before you get the chop, try using Albert Luque for he might just be THE ONE to save you from being one of the most hated managers on Tyneside! The lad is a class act, if you’ve seen him play in La Liga for Deportivo. He’s a natural goal getter and with that powerful left foot of his, he can terrorize defenders if he’s being shown the trust and gets a string of games under his belt.
GR, wake up, for the sleeping giant of the North East needs to start showing results, and I really hope the glory days 10 years ago can be re-lived!
Sent in on: November 1st, 2006 at 6:34 am
Luque no doubt should be given some chance. Imagine Shevchenko, because of some ineffective performances, were relegated to the reserves by Mourinho. It’ll be a disaster for the club. Everyone needs a chance and Luque definitely deserves one. Dear Roeder, you have nothing to lose by giving him one. And he may be the gem who can solve our striking problems.
Sent in on: November 1st, 2006 at 5:00 am
It’s such a good point the lack of goals and it’s often overlooked.
Having had a few minutes I looked at some stats for us for our Premiership years and compared them to how we are doing now as well as what sort of form gets you 4th and what gets you the 3rd bottom relegation place….
•4th on average finishes with 65 points, 61 goals scored and 38 conceded.
•3rd bottom on average finishes with 38 points, 42 goals scored and 61 conceded.
•At our current level of performance we will finish the season with 30 points, 27 goals scored and 49 against. This will see us comfortably relegated.
I looked at our premiership years to see if we really are “slow†starters…
•Depressingly we actually normally tail off slightly, on average, scoring slightly fewer goals and gaining fewer points and we concede marginally more too.
•Extrapolating this out we would, on average, finish the season with 29 points, 25 goals scored and 50 conceded. This will also see us comfortably relegated.
•So let’s be optimistic… in 1999 we boosted our points per game ratio by 198% for the last three quarters of the season, in 2005 we boosted our goals scored per game by 155% for that same period and also in 1999 we saw our goals against per game reduce by 62%… so using these stats on the current performance we would finish with 59 points, having scored 41 goals and only conceded 31. Excellent… mid table mediocrity, playing no score draw and 1-0 football, something to aspire to!
•And being pessimistic (i.e. our worst performances for the last three quarters of the season) would see us finish with 20 points, 16 scored and 80 conceded. Something to aim for there then.
In summary:
•On current form we will go down.
•On our usual season form we will go down.
•If we replicate our best ever season’s form we will achieve mid table mediocrity.
•The only consolation is that we are conceding far less than usual for a side relegated (nearly 0.3 per game) and that this might see us hold onto 16/17th position as Watford, Sheffield United and Charlton get spanked up and down the country.
WE NEED TO SCORE GOALS… GIVE LUQUE A CHANCE!
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 9:57 pm
I’m a Toon fan from Norway, and I can only say one thing. Luque scored some fantastic goals in Spain and he will do it again. Too bad it won’t be for us, it seems. Since I live in Norway I can’t get to St. James’ Park and support the lad, but please; I beg you all who can, to get out and support him, sing for him or do whatever You can get him on the pitch. He is Quality!!!
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 5:08 pm
Well said. Surely a striker needs a run of games and now is the perfect time to give Luque that run, given Shola’s hip injury and now Martins’ hamstrings… give the lad a chance. I’m sure that combining him with Rossi (in the Premiership, mind) would be pretty interesting.
Can you blame him for looking peed off and disinterested watching non-strikers in his place, failing to score. I’ve supported the lads for 30-odd years, and the last few years have got me feeling apathetic of late!!
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 4:52 pm
It’s about time someone mentioned Luque. What is going on behind the closed doors of the training ground? What could possibly be keeping GR from using the apparent abundant skills of the Spaniard? We have Rossi for a limited time and Ameobi due for surgery sooner rather than later. It seems simple to me, send Ameobi off for his op while we at least have strikers on the bench and if all else fails we have enough midfielders itching to get on the pitch that I’m sure Milner would be more than happy to take a spot in the front line when needed.
Luque could be one of the best players we have but we will never know if he doesn’t get 3 or 4 months of regular appearances. Can someone tell me why Luque isn’t the #1 partner for Martins anyway? Come on GR, play Luque and let’s see what he can do!! If we don’t play him at all he will have no value to the team, literally. Sitting on the bench and making appearances for the reserves will no doubt make him the next expensive write off. Perhaps GR thinks there is a refund policy on some of his players?
Charles
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 1:25 pm
Anyone doubting Albert Luque please take a look at this link. And this guy can’t get in our team?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=381LRSWLGDY
The guy is a class act.
Roeder you are ruining a great player and depriving our team of a potential star.
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 1:03 pm
What must Luque be thinking, a 19 year old loanee and a winger picked ahead of him on Saturday. Why will Roeder not give the lad a fair go? If he has a run of 5 or 6 games in the team he will show everyone what a class act he is. Roeder has no bottle and prefers the so called tried and tested players and if this continues I can see us being involved in a dog fight. As for Martins Roeder is trying to justify what looks like a very over the top fee for a guy who has very little composure in front of goal, Rossi is a very decent prospect but will be back at Man Utd in Jan as Fergie is afraid we will ruin his player, Ameobi needs five chances to score a goal and has injury problems.
So there you have it, is giving Albert a fair crack such a gamble, I think not. So come on Roeder pull your head out of you backside and wake up to what is happening. Duff, Emre, Milner, Nzogbia, Luque, Martins, Given, Taylor, Solano. Do you really want to be remembered as the manager who took this lot down? COME ON look what O’Neill is doing at Villa with nowhere near the talent we have. If you can’t manage this lot, do the decent thing and walk away before the only decent manager available (Curbishley) is snapped up.
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 12:46 pm
Plain and simple really, ROEDER has lost the plot. Not only with Luque, but with the rest of the team. SOLANO in for young Milner, who arguably has been our most consistent performer this season? Parker picks up an injury in first half on Saturday, but we play him in a withdrawn role,”I wont take the risk of playing players who arent 100% fit” anyone remember that statement?
Parker off, Milner on as soon as injury occurred, that was the correct thing to do! LUQUE, given continual backing by the manager then lumped in the reserves and told to warm up for every game. That is breeding confidence in the lad isnt it, giving him much needed experience of the Premiership. ROEDER is not the man to take this club forward, I said that last season, even during his unbeaten run (when all pressure was off), he is Fred’s get out clause thats all!!
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 9:35 am
We should give him a chance, how many chances has Ameobi had? Chopra didn’t get a run in the first team and look at him now! Ameobi had 100 more chances than Chopra had, or what Luque ever will. It’s impossible for any player to be expected to score goals often when not getting a full half under their belt. Most people on here agree he should get a good run of games, and only then, can people start judging him properly. Saying that, we got Roeder in after judging him after a quarter of a season, maybee it’s a trend at Newcastle these days.
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 9:15 am
Carroll serves up winner for United
By The Journal. Oct 31 2006
Teenager Andy Carroll stole Albert Luque’s thunder with the winning goal after replacing the Spanish international early in the second half at Kingston Park last night.
The 17-year-old Geordie was sent on for Luque after an ineffective 55 minutes from the £10m striker.
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 8:37 am
I agree with the comments about Luque, he has not been given a fair deal, when the manager plays players out of position, and has millions of pounds worth of talent sat on the bench in one striker, questions need to be asked. Against Charlton on the weekend with 25 minutes to go, it was so obvious that some players were running out of steam, yet still no subs, until Milner then it was far to late to make any impact!
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 12:50 am
I am so glad that so many Toon fans are supporting Luque. The lad definitely needs his chance in the starting line up. It has been very difficult for him. He had a very nasty injury, and once he regained his fitness there was still no place in the team for him. How can you expect someone to adapt to the Premiership when he doesn’t get played! Every foreign player needs time to adapt!
Luque is a class player. The goals he scored in the reserve game against Liverpool were absolutely fantastic. The Liverpool fans at the game even applauded him when he was substituted late on. He could do a better job than an injured Shola Ameobi. Roeder needs to play him, however I won’t hold my breath because Roeder clearly doesn’t like him. If Roeder had any sense Luque would have been playing after the reserve game against Liverpool, the lad’s confidence would have been sky high. Instead he’s left to rot on the bench.
PLAY LUQUE!!!!!
Sent in on: October 31st, 2006 at 12:10 am
Luque has the potential to be a worldclass goalscorer, some of the goals he scored at Deportivo were amazing, headers, volleys, six yarders and 30 yarders, running on and running in, check them out they are on the internet, yet unless he gets a run in the team he will never produce.
Shevchenko, 30 odd million and only 2 goals so far!!!! The last manager who went head to head with a player, the Jock against Bellamy, the true losers of that little run in was NUFC and the fans.
Give Luque a go Glenn, how much worse can he be than what we have, you never know he may actually come good.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 11:03 pm
Get a life mate - everyone has seen enough of Luque to know that he is probably our worst big buy ever, and there have been some shockers over the years. The guy is a complete and utter waste of space.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:08 pm
If Luque is ever going to succeed at Newcastle he definitely has to be given a good run in the first team. Roeder can’t just throw him on for five minutes and expect him to set the world alight. However, as much as I’d like to see the guy do well, I can’t see it happening.
At the moment the team lacks a cutting edge, a creative spark, breaks from the midfield seem only to end in speculative long shots at best. We have no one who is prepared to get on the ball and pass it. The likes of Emre, Duff and N’Zogbia all lack the ability to produce killer final balls. Where this relates to Luque is that he is not a player that will feed off scraps, he is much more effective when he has the ball played to his feet. At the moment all he’d have to feed on would be poor crosses and hopeless long balls.
Despite this he and Rossi are the only natural goal scorers in our current squad. It is my opinion that Roeder would be much better off pursuing this combination rather than persisting with the whole ‘big man, little man’ idea.
I would love nothing more than to be proved wrong by both Roeder and Luque, in that the team does possess a cutting edge and Luque can adapt to Roeder’s preferred style of play but at the moment cannot see it happening.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 8:54 pm
I agree. At nearly £10m and given the fact we know he is talented we need to play him as it is the only way he will adapt and NUFC fans will see the best of him.
Given our current striker woes what have we to lose?
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 8:47 pm
What a great article and response.
The lack of playing time for Luque is nothing short of a disgrace. He can’t do any worse that the others up front presently and if Glenn wanted “hungry players” then he must be the most famished at the club!
It also, I am afraid makes good business sense…. the lad will be off when the first decent offer comes in, but if he’s not paying that “undisclosed” fee will maybe be a couple of million rather than the nine or so we paid for him.
Play him for six matches… he can’t be any worse and it will boost any future fee… oh and it will get us the points we need.
The only chance we have of avoiding relegation are that two of the teams below us are even worse (Charlton and Sheffield United) and hoping that West Ham continue to blow up spectacularly, which now looks unlikely!
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 8:33 pm
If, as has been suggested, Luque isn’t interested. Then why was the lad warming up for virtually the whole game on Saturday. I agree fully with what has been written. At the moment we have two fit frontmen. One is a 19 year old loanee, the other is a proven international who has never been given a chance by the manager. Luque must play, and allow Duff to do what he was bought to do. Get crosses into the danger area. If Luque is given a decent run I’m positive he will deliver with goals. Lets face it, at this moment in time we ain’t got any other options other than playing midfielders out of position. COME ON GLENN, USE A BIT OF COMMON SENSE HERE, even eat a little humble pie. You haven’t given the kid a chance. The lad could save your neck!
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 8:28 pm
I was at the UEFA cup match against th Estonian team and Luque came on as sub, I may be wrong but I thouht the other players to a large extent were ignoring him. Why, I don’t know but that was my impression.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 7:34 pm
I agree fully, Roeder and his inept coaching staff seem more interested in not losing than risking a win.
Agree about Luque but lets get off Shola’s back as well, the lad is willing to play despite being injured, the one thing we criticise others for not doing and his goals per starts has improved no end in the last year, by no means a new Shearer or Owen but when having a go lets not have a go at someone who is willing to play and whose goals have got us to where we were last season and especially the ones against the mackems at home.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 7:06 pm
Roeder doesn’t have a clue, the same for Shepherd. We are just doomed. Luque is a good player if any of you saw the 30 yard goals he scored for the reserves the other week you would have been impressed. The one thing we are lacking at the moment is a fit goalscoring striker which I am sure Luque is so just give him a chance Glenn as you’re gonna get sacked soon with Fat Freddy in charge. There is no harm in giving the lad a chance as he must be good as he was one of the best Spanish talents at one point and if he cost 9.5m how can he be worse than anyone else we have.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 6:28 pm
I couldnt agree more. I was shouting my head of at the TV to give the guy a chance against Charlton.
He is playing for the Reserves against Rovers and he must start against Palermo, a continental opponent!!!
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 6:22 pm
He needs to be given six or seven full games in a row. Even if he doesnt perform in the first few we need to stick with him. He cannot do any worse than Shola up front. ROEDER OUT!
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 6:01 pm
Fully Agree!
Luque needs his chance!
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 5:47 pm
I agree with you guys completely. There are plenty of La Liga clubs showing interest in the player whom our manager thinks is crap. It is just mind boggling, when you play an 18 years old and a winger and left the big name striker sitting on the bench. If I am Luque, I will leave come January, because if he continue to play with us, it will cost him his international carear. It is just sad.
I am getting more and more frustrated with our dear manager, whom is only good at making stupid blank comments. It is just clear that he is not capable of running a team of this calibre in this league. Look at our squad, I really think he is wasting a host of talent we have. I am sure if we had gotten Martin O’Neill instead of Glenn Roeder, we would have been soaring. Again look at our squad and those in the top ten, other then those traditional strong teams like Man U, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool, who else have the players of our calibre (can’t say the same for the defensive players though, expecially Carr, pathetic). Look how O’Neill is able to turn their squad of half talents into half decent players.
By the way I am writing from Malaysia, and I am feeling more and more difficult to tell people that I am a fan of Newcastle. To them it just don’t make sense, to support a team that is always losing. Last time at least we had Shearer, now, who can I look to? Martins?
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 4:26 pm
I like many sat at the weekend watching the Toon yet again outplay the opposition, but yet again fail to collect the three points. I looked across to the players warming up and hoped Luque would get at least the last 25 minutes, but not a chance. You have to feel sorry for Luque when a manager like Roeder won’t play you, you would never know we’ve got problems.
Why does Roeder wait so long before putting his subs on, they don’t have enough time to change a game. I watched Luque warming up on saturday and correct me if I’m wrong but he looks a broken man, just imagine in 40 years time with his grandson on his knee Luque turning to his grandson and telling him that Shola Ameobi kept him out of a pretty poor Newcastle United side, what an embarrasment for him.
But it’s not all doom and gloom for Luque at least he can move on in December while we will be on the brink of relagation thanks to Mr Roeder (will he set a new record for the amount of teams he’s managed to relegation?)
PS can anyone enlighten me as to why Newcastle fans go crazy when we get a corner? As we never score from them, we haven’t any Les Ferdinand’s, Gary Speed’s or Alan Shearer’s anymore (more is the pity)
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 2:34 pm
Bob Yule, I understand what you’re saying but for me Luque did more than enough in the pre-season InterToto games and friendlies to be in with an even chance of making the first-team for the start of the season. Remember we only had Ameobi at that point and hadn’t yet bought Martins or Sibierski.
But Luque was dropped and hasn’t had much of a look-in since so it is very hard for him to prove to the manager what he can do or to do the things you ask of him.
That’s why I think the whole “he can’t be arsed/ he doesn’t try” debate is a moot one and not valid at all.
If you know you you’ll be out of the team even if you play well, why should he be motivated and chomping at the bit when he gets a few rare minutes here and there and are those conditions conducive to settling in, finding form and having an impact? They aren’t ideal conditions are they?
The other argument of course as to why he isn’t being picked is: “he musn’t be doing enough in training”, but if that really is the case, isn’t it bad management on Roeder’s part to put him on the bench then? And why the positive soundbites from Roeder where Luque’s “excellent attitude” to training is concerned which he has spouted a few times now, most recently following a brace against Liverpool in the reserves where by all accounts he was fantastic?
Things just don’t make sense or add up.
Now we will be forced to use him due to injuries and Rossi’s absence from European matches and no doubt those who piss and moan will expect him to deliver the goods just like that. And if he doesn’t…
He can’t quite win at the moment. Fingers crossed when selected, he does well because we need some inspiration from somewhere.
Anyway thanks to everyone who wrote in, keep them coming.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 1:44 pm
First of all, thanks for writing this brilliant article (I was just about to write one and send it to you!), to be honest this is the one thing that is killing me slowly game by game, Luque was almost a legend in Spain, he was the player that changed a whole game by just getting the ball, I am a fan of Madrid (or at least I support them in Spain), and I saw the wonders Albert Luque produced whenever he played against Real, he was one of the biggest players in the league, Newcastle signing him was considered a suprise as Real Madrid, Barcelona ,and many other teams were interested in signing him.
A year later and we are suffring in attack, AND HE IS SITTING ON THE BENCH, the funny thing is that I am certain that he is the solution to our attacking problems, but I know that instead of giving him a chance, Roeder will do to him what we did before with Hugo Viana (buy him as a brilliant player, sell him at a huge loss without really trying him out).
Last time I heard Roeder talk about Luque, he said he lacked aggression, really? I see players such as bad hip Ameobi and Rossi, Nzogbia and Milner playing in the first team, do they have more aggression than Luque, I don’t think so.
Luque was our only decent available striker in the last two games, he didn’t play them, now with Rossi unavalibile, Martins and Sibierski injured abd Ameobi half fit, he should play, but I am thinking there is a bigger chance Pav will play in attack than Luque getting a go.
Roeder has some serious PERSONAL issues with Luque I think, and that’s the only thing that makes sense to me, a player who is playing nicely whenever he gets a few minutes is sitting on the bench, while players such as Shola Ameobi and Martins get in the first team time and time again.
We might never know what’s wrong with Luque until we sell him in Janurary, which will probably happen as long as he stays on the bench! Then it will be all too late, and we will record a 5 million plus loss on him.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 12:54 pm
A very good article and a one to which I totally agree. I remember a manager called Bruce Rioch who brought in a one Dennis Bergkamp. He took a while to settle and Rioch was gone before he saw the best of him. At the time it was said he looked uncomfortable, uninterested, a waste of money etc. etc. and yet once he settled he became one of the all time greats at the Arsenal. I am not saying Luque could be the saviour of the club and Glenn Roeder but…
Another player who we had but did not always deliver was Laurent Robert, Sir Bobby played him time and time again because he knew in one split second he could change a game even though he was missing for 89mins and 59 secs.
We need to understand that a team is a mixture of graft and flare which should compliment each other. The grafters allow the flare players to play their own game and entertain which is what we all want….
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 11:12 am
In total agreemnet, putting Duff up as striker, when this lad clearly needs to be given a go. Should at least have been on for the second half on Saturday. He can do no worse than anybody else, when they are not hitting the back of the net, give him a go.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 11:08 am
Totaly agree, he hasnt been given a chance, you also missed out the fact before we bought him he hadn’t played a pre-season game, [Souness played him] then got injured and then got thrown back into the side doing a couple of days training after a very bad injury.
Major changes are needed at this club, not at the end of the season, not in a few years, RIGHT NOW! And it starts with the board.
Since Sir Bobby went I have never been SO ashmed to wear the Newcastle top in the streets, walking past any other fan I find myself not being able to have my head held high and proud to wear the shirt. Instead its more like turning away covering the top…
Something needs to be done about the board and manager before it’s too late, it wont be long before we become just Another Leeds United.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 11:07 am
Everytime Roeder opens his big fat gob these days, he lies or contradicts himself. He is a bit of a lemon as a manager I’m afraid.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:44 am
Albert will be gone come January, no doubt. In fact for his own career he should have gone in September. Where he will go, who knows. One thing is for sure if he ends up playing for a decent manager then he will be to our loss.
We have seen NOTHING of what he can do for the first team, damned because he hasn´t been given the chance! The guy barely gets picked for the reserves! When he does play for the reserves he plays a blinder!
I like many, can´t understand why he is being overlooked and as a consequence many questions are starting to be asked of our manager.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:38 am
This article is absolutely spot on, I couldn’t agree more. Roeder clearly has some personal gripe with Luque that goes beyond “he doesn’t try hard enough” because on saturday against a weak Charlton team we were losing our way with 30 minutes to go and needed a spark. What did Roeder do? Zip. Nothing. He is either tactically inept or is letting a personal grudge interfere with the good running of our football club. Either way I’m getting madder by the game….
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:20 am
Isn’t that the heart of the problem though? Normally, you’d expect and want a player who’s been dropped to be determined to prove the manager wrong, and to really be fired up to take advantage of the next opportunity that comes his way. That doesn’t seem to happen with Luque.
The frustrating thing is that, unlike say Viana or Bassedas, I think Luque does have the physical strength to handle the Premiership. He just seems to lack the aggression and determination.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:19 am
While I’m one of the few who seems to think that Duff had a decent game against Charlton & I’m yet to see anything from Luque… I wanted him on for at least the last 30 mins. You can only work with what you’ve got & looking at the subs bench & who was doing what on the pitch, I didn’t feel we needed both Parker & Butt on the pitch. I would have taken Butt off, bring Zoggy in the middle, Duff on the left & any striker we have on the bench (Luque) needs to be playing up front with Rossi. Sorted.
P.S I have nothing against Butt & don’t think he had a bad game by any means, but Charlton offered very little threat & 2 holding midfielders was a bit overkill once the 2nd half settles down.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:18 am
I also find it hard to believe that we have a drought of home grown players. Losing Carrick from the door-step was a huge error - what do these scouts think they are playing at??
Surely there must be some young blood in our region who would dearly love to play for Newcastle and especially our own reserve team?
I think the errors Shepherd (and Roeder) made during the summer in not bringing in the right players will live to haunt us for a long long time.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:15 am
Very well written.
You have conveyed my thoughts exactly.
Only Glenn knows the answer to this riddle and he is not being honest with us.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:06 am
I agree that Roeder shoud use Luque - he can’t be any worse than who we currently have available. I also think that his tactics of putting on subs with seconds to go on the clock is preposterous. Its not a situation where we can tactically run down the clock… we need goals! I also beleive that his technique of praising players who are obvioulsy rubbish (Bramble among others) is to hopefully increase their apparent value to unsuspecting clubs so he can have a January clear out.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:05 am
What a great point… I think you have just said what we are all thinking. On Saturday we have an international well respected in Spain who, all be it hasn’t started playing well yet, sitting on the bench keeping the bench warm. Surely a smarter manager would realise Luque is the man who can get us out of this drought if he plays like he did in Spain. The few game he has played this season he has at least looked interested and scored a couple of goals (2 against Dudek from 35 yards in the reserves & 1 in the InterToto). Come on Glenn give him a chance, he could be our saviour from this terrible glut.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 10:01 am
I was sitting here on Saturday watching the shambles that is Newcastle United. Dragging away what was left of my dignity, after having screamed at TV for 90min, whilst having all my Czech friends laughing at me and telling me that like them I should support Chelsea, (apperantly they do so because Cech plays for them!)
Thinking why is Glenn playing Duff out of position, when he has a perfectly good forward sitting on the bench.
Yes Some of you may not agree with my opinion that Luque is a good forward. However I have seen him play, and though it was at Deportivo, the guy is class!!
Again, Yes you may remark on the fact he has not done anything for Newcastle, but the plain and simple fact is that he has not been given the chance. Players take time to adjust to the Premiership, (OK not all of them), however even Pires and Henry took their time to make an impact here, and once they did, what an impact!
Look at Rooney this season, he did nothing to begin with (after his suspension), however Sir Alex kept faith and now it is paying dividends.
I’m not saying the Luque is going to be the next Henry or Rooney, but he will never reach his full potential sitting on the bench or playing in reserve games. Currently he has only played for us 16 times.
He needs games! He deserves a long run in the first team!
After which we can get a true idea of his skills and commitment.
Sent in on: October 30th, 2006 at 9:49 am