Why Shepherd’s losing his sheep
By Andrew Flintoff On Tue 14 Nov 2006 |
You know when you see a small child jumping up and down and performing daft tricks to try and impress their parents? “Look mam, no hands,†they’ll shout, normally before falling spectacularly off their bike with a crash, writhing around in pain, thinking “I probably shouldn’t have done that.†They never learn though, do they?
Before long, they are once more pedalling furiously downhill towards a wall, trying a “no-hander†that maybe one day will raise a smile from their mam. That’s a bit how I see our beloved chairman Freddy Shepherd.
He’s always at the front of the queue trying to impress his “friends†in the football world by hoying his hat into the ring for the world’s superstars – Rooney, Owen, Shearer, Ronaldinho, Roberto Baggio. “Look at me boys, I can buy anyone. We’re the biggest club in the world man. Lads…lads…lads man, look!â€
Now don’t get me wrong here, I think there are worse chairman in football than Freddy Shepherd. He has his faults, but he outweighs them by his continual backing of the manager with funds. But it’s becoming clearer and clearer that a rich man doesn’t become so by being understanding.
When Mr Bling himself signed his new £80k per week contract last year, many fans were up in arms. The Little Waster had doubled his salary without actually having done anything on the pitch to deserve it.
Freddy Shepherd had splurged yet more of the clubs wage budget on a player who in his seven seasons on Tyneside has managed a meagre 220 appearances (many of those as sub) and a pathetic 35 over the last two years. To hand over such a huge amount of wonga to a player who’s appearance record is so dismal would surely signal that the club must have a bottomless pit of wages to give to its staff? Correct?
So when Mr Shepherd finally bit the bullet and kicked out Souness and his cronies in February of this year, the £3m payoff would have been a mere drop in the ocean, yes?
Wrong. At Christmas 2005, all staff were due their annual pay-rise. Every Christmas, staff members across the board, be it at retail, administration even down to the catering staff are given a small 3% pay rise to keep up with the cost of living. In 2005, it never materialised. The official reason given to us was that a downturn in takings over the year of 04/05 had meant that the stores had not hit their target for merchandise income, due to poor performance – on the pitch.
Essentially, the players were under-performing, causing a downturn in profits, and as a knock-on effect, the staff were told that the pay rise would not be forthcoming. The pay rise was sat awaiting authorisation, and yet it was never agreed to, and staff went without.
There’s also the shambolic distribution of these free scarves - a faulty bunch arrive, granted (and they were atrocious quality) - but it’s now gone on almost four months, and the best the club could do was to hand out a batch of left-over Shearer Testimonial scarves to the away fans at Manchester City. Not good PR, not well dealt-with.
Off-field there any many problems. Despite it having pretty impressive figures each year, mail order is situated at the back of a dilapidated warehouse in Walker – rented to the club of course by Mr Shepherd’s brother, who allegedly originally bought it from Freddy for less than the club now pays back per year.
The club stores insist on charging £40 for football shirts that can be bought elsewhere for at least £10 cheaper (although Mr Shepherd was inaccurate when he said they cost £5 originally – they actually cost £17 per shirt).
When we got to the FA Cup semi final last year at Cardiff, any staff who applied for tickets were given one of the priciest tickets of the lot - £45. A fantastic thank-you for all staff I’m sure you’d agree. Staff do not get free tickets - they do not even get discount on match tickets. In fact, it is sometimes more difficult to get tickets for matches if you tell the Box Office that you are staff, as they tend to stick the applications on the desk and they don’t get seen to till ages later.
For the game at the Riverside against Middlesbrough lately, it was the Friday beforehand when my tickets arrived, leaving me two days to take a spare off me and to sort my travel. Luckily it wasn’t a London game or a European game. Again, a great thankyou for hard work and effort.
This is where Flintoff the Fan comes back into it. I love the team, I’m passionate, I’ve got black and white blood. But there comes a time in all our lives when the thing you love pisses you right off. I’d estimate that virtually everyone who reads this will agree with the following statement: “love the team, hate the club.â€
Maybe hatred is a strong word, but when you have such fine upstanding gentlemen like Mr Shepherd and Mr Hall on the board, it is extremely difficult to feel any affinity to the people behind the scenes.
Back onto the playing field, and we have a proven failure in charge (not that I’m not behind Roeder, but facts speak for themselves), a squad badly lacking in quality and quantity, and a back four that boasts the “talents†of Messrs Bramble, Babayaro and Carr.
We have two “strikers†in Ameobi and Martins, a mid-table cast off in Sibierski (who has done well in his defence), a non-entity in Luque and millions of pounds worth of midfielders, who between them seem to create the square root of nothing. We have a lot to worry about, that’s for sure.
The longer it goes on, the worse it is going to get. The last transfer window was a shambles, and the next one is absolutely vital. But something tells me that Mr Shepherd will not use it as wisely as we need to.
My brain tells me not to, but all I can think of now is Freddy, on a bicycle, pie in hand, trying to avoid that brick wall at the bottom of the hill. Think fast, Freddy, because it’s getting closer.

1 point - backing his managers does not make up for any of Shepherd’s mistakes. I hate this ‘well he’s always put the money up’ crap. It’s our money!!!!!! And I’d rather he hadn’t released it for most of the crap we’ve bought. It’s absolutely frightening the amount of money the club has wasted.
Shepherd has NO idea how to run a football club.
And the Chronicle has a lot to answer for also.
Sent in on: November 22nd, 2006 at 10:27 am
Vinny: I don’t expect nothing except some appreciation, we don’t even get that.
Thanks for your kind comments though everyone. Shepherd is a cancer and must go.
Sent in on: November 15th, 2006 at 6:24 pm
aye, i can accept any chairman failing sometimes, but the regularity and repitition of the number of failings shepherd’s makes only leads to one conclusion. he is a incompentent moronic deluded chairman who lacks any grounding in strategic nous and clearly does not have the ability to learn from his mistakes. learning from one’s mistakes is a very very important thing to have in life, otherwise the karma will always repeat itself. and that is what NUFC is suffering, from shepherds karma. and yet he gets away with not learning because we cannot hold him accountable, and the fact he always hides behind his managers and spending record which he is ultimately responsible for anyway!
SHEPHERD OUT
Sent in on: November 15th, 2006 at 4:42 pm
Big organisations always seem to go down the route of cancelling the milk rather than the Sky Sports Extra subscription. When we should have given thought to whether it was sensible to give Dyer 80K a week, we are holding back on about £800 a year to the people who keep the club going. NUFC isn’t unique in that regard.
We are probably counting every last penny in our attempts to avoid the debtor’s courts.
Scandalous mis-management of a great club.
Sent in on: November 15th, 2006 at 9:34 am
Rob,
Your comments are spot on, the truth is unless some mysterious benefactor(s) comes out of the woodwork we are stuck with Shepherd, very reminiscent of “Pirate Jack” Westwood and McKeag who wouldn’t go until the price was right - and were those guys hated..!
I always believed when Sir JH took over we would see a change and it did happen for about 10 years but it seems as time has gone by that the power corrupts and The Club does become the Chairman/Board’s personal plaything and they obviously forget why they took over (or why they told us, the fans) and repeat the same mistakes that those they replaced made (hey the Yanks even think they won in Vietnam nowadays!)
Whilst we are stuck for the foreseeable future with the Chairman, he “claims” to be a fan and therefore he should know how we suffer with the current situation/performances and should therefore address it (would he let a manager in his own business get away with this type of performance) and avoid the BS - tell it as it is or don’t say anything (prospective transfers come to mind here, when we are linked with all and sundry) - I don’t ask for world class (in the short term at least), I ask for us to be competitive
Roeder may be a nice guy and I don’t know him to comment otherwise but as the old saying goes “nice guys finish last” and last is the last place where I want to see NUFC. If we are going to replace him get a new guy (Hitzfeld) and do it now, to let us be in a position to get the guys the (new) Manager wants in during the transfer window to - to fail is not a crime but to not learn from it surely is, we were in a vaguely similar position 12 months ago - have we (they) not learnt from this
Rant over…
Sent in on: November 15th, 2006 at 5:39 am
find another job fella!!,its hard enough having to go home and away at the minute,let alone having to work for the greedy git!.Im self employed in the constuction industry mate and dont find any favours from employers or any backhanders either ,do you expect free tickets or somat?
Sent in on: November 14th, 2006 at 4:45 pm
Couldn’t agree with your sentiments more. Your comments are measured, without some of the histrionics occasionally seen and heard in other places. The one that really chimed for me was,
“Maybe hatred is a strong word, but when you have such fine upstanding gentlemen like Mr Shepherd and Mr Hall on the board, it is extremely difficult to feel any affinity to the people behind the scenes.”
Wasn’t it always the case? Taking aside our current predicament, that is what I find the most annoying.
Sir John Hall always left me cold, though was the best of a bad bunch. Think of Seymour or McKeag. Families have always run this club as some form of personal fiefdom, though in the old days they didn’t pretend to be a public company. Some of the proposed buyers in the past also seems a little suspect or unsuitable (Malcolm Dix anybody?).
The only thing I agree with at the moment is Shepherd resisting the takeover by Belgravia. His share dividends have been used largely to fund his share purchase (and grip) in the club. Belgravia will be looking to make a profit for their investors, greater than could be achieved elsewhere. Venture Captial groups only chase the money and look to make as good areturn as possible.
When people shout for Shepherd to go, they must think about who is to replace him, and the Halls. In the absense of a viable alternative in terms of funds and also wellbeing of the club, I guess we are stuck with the current regime, as much as that must annoy the Halls and many of the fans
Sent in on: November 14th, 2006 at 3:35 pm
On the subject of the ‘pay rise’ or lack off.
I work for a firm with a £2bn turnover, a 35% net profit margin whose only significant costs are staff wages.
Our payrise this year was 1%, effectively a paycut and a loss of reclaimable overtime of 4 days.
Its not just the NUFC board who are scrooges!
Sent in on: November 14th, 2006 at 3:18 pm