+  Newcastle-Online Forum
|-+  NUFC» Football» Gossip: Reo Coker and Owen
Username:
Password:
Home Help Arcade Search Login Register
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gossip: Reo Coker and Owen  (Read 1451 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
sicko2ndbest
Offline Offline


let go of my balls man
« on: February 11, 2007, 09:46:06 AM »
TOON'S REO BID

By Ray Ryan

NEWCASTLE will make a £5million move for Nigel Reo-Coker in the summer — and they are about to clinch a new deal with James Milner.

Toon boss Glenn Roeder has earmarked the Hammers skipper as a possible replacement for Turkish star Emre, whose future is in doubt over a race row.

And Roeder is ready to raid his former club to make a move for 22-year-old midfielder Reo-Coker.

Quit

Winger Milner has also given the Geordies a boost after pledging his future to the club despite nearly quitting five months ago.

Milner, 21, is on the verge of signing a new four-year contract which will keep him at St James' Park until 2011.

Milner almost quit for Aston Villa in the summer after a spell on loan.

But he said: "Since I have come back I have hit the ground running. I kept my house up here and that helps.

"This has been a fantastic season because I am enjoying my football.

"I would like to stay here a long time."

ALSO ON OWEN

NOTW reckon he his big buds with the new Liverpol owners, and they want him back at Liverpool as long as Benitez also wants him

Owen is a geordie, no chancce will he return to Liverpool after all we have done for him
Logged
Interviewer: 'Would it be fair to describe you as a volatile player?'
David Beckham: 'Well, I can play in the centre, on the right and occasionally on the left side.'
ATB
Offline Offline



WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2007, 09:54:45 AM »
sounds intresting. but to be honest I haven´t seem him so much so I don´t really know if he is going to be better then Emre.


But it sounds intresting and for me Emre isen´t good enough
Logged
Newcastle United!!!
James
Offline Offline


08:22am - Emre isn't the mole
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2007, 10:00:42 AM »
Owen link was bound to come out sooner or later.

Liverpool can't score consistently, while Liverpool missed out before because they couldn't afford him. With the cash inflow, newspapers are going to jump to the obvious conclusion that he is Liverpool bound.

Unlikely I'd say.
Logged
The Official Obafemi Martins Tally

Newcastle Appearances: 38
Goals: 16
Scored with - Left: 8
                 - Right: 5
                 - Head: 3
Darth Toon
Offline Offline
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2007, 10:08:37 AM »
We're after Kenny Miller according to the Sunday Sun:

https://icnewcastle.icnetwork.co.uk/newcastleunited/news/tm_headline=still-time-for-miller%26method=full%26objectid=18606428%26siteid=50081-name_page.html

 {$default_cry_smiley}
Logged
Menace
Online Online
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2007, 10:13:10 AM »
I'd demand our money back for Owen, considering they are supposed to be minted now.
Logged
thedudeabides
Offline Offline
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2007, 10:16:41 AM »
Quote from: Darth Toon on February 11, 2007, 10:08:37 AM
We're after Kenny Miller according to the Sunday Sun:

https://icnewcastle.icnetwork.co.uk/newcastleunited/news/tm_headline=still-time-for-miller%26method=full%26objectid=18606428%26siteid=50081-name_page.html

 {$default_cry_smiley}



Kenny Miller, f****** hell that's absolutely shocking.
Logged
EVER GET THE FEELING YOU’VE BEEN CHEATED?


www.dogboff.com
NUFC06
Online Online


HE WILL BE HERE FOR A LONG TIME...
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2007, 11:44:43 AM »
I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Butt
Logged


THE FUTURE…REMEMBER ONE THING-THEY ARE ONLY 20
Howaythelads
Offline Offline


Ncle has no ambition, I'm off to Villa
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2007, 11:52:56 AM »
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 11:44:43 AM
I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Butt

I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Parka
Logged
Gemmill and Alex abusing members
https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=36633.msg725085#msg725085
ElDiablo
Online Online


HIT IT!!!!!11
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2007, 11:55:24 AM »
I'd rather not have Reo-Coker anywhere near our team at all to be honest. Sidwell is a better option.
Logged
Howaythelads
Offline Offline


Ncle has no ambition, I'm off to Villa
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2007, 11:56:44 AM »
Quote from: ElDiablo on February 11, 2007, 11:55:24 AM
I'd rather not have Reo-Coker anywhere near our team at all to be honest. Sidwell is a better option.

Aye, but the topic is about Reo-Coker and Owen. You aren't allowed to move off topic apparently.
Logged
Gemmill and Alex abusing members
https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=36633.msg725085#msg725085
Superior Grant
Offline Offline
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2007, 12:03:53 PM »
Owen is a professional and would not leave us having played so few games.  Plus i dont think liverpool would want him.
Logged
Total toon away games (including neutral venues): 90
Away games this season:
Lillestrom 3-0
Ventspils 1-0
Villa 0-2
Boro 0-1
Man City 0-0
Arsenal 1-1
Blackburn 3-1
Birmingham (FAC) 2-2
Fulham 1-2
Chalrton 0-2
NUFC06
Online Online


HE WILL BE HERE FOR A LONG TIME...
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2007, 12:05:48 PM »
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 11:52:56 AM
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 11:44:43 AM
I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Butt

I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Parka

Are you on drugs again?
and
Why do u hate Parker so much?
Logged


THE FUTURE…REMEMBER ONE THING-THEY ARE ONLY 20
Nate
Offline Offline
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2007, 12:08:37 PM »
Reo-Coker would be somewhat of a gamble considering he's only performed consistently for one season.. and even if West Ham are relegated, as the England u21 captain, he's sure to have an overinflated price tag. I'm undecided about Sidwell, he'd only leave Reading for guarenteed first team football and i don't know wether he's good enough to merit it.
Logged
Tired of being on the road, lonely as a sparrow in the rain.
nufcjmc
Offline Offline
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2007, 12:10:03 PM »
more likely if liverpool were wanting to show off their new found wealth then it would be david villa they will go for seen as they were linked to heavily in the summer. Also rememebering back to the whole thing surrounding the transfer rafa let him go on to pastures new owen always said that he was a liverpool for life man and he went anyway. I have to think that rafa would feel mega red faced if he put in a 12million bid for a striker he didnt want to hold onto. Also have to agree pundits the world over would be giving owen a hard time for comming to a team playing under 1000 mins and leaving,
Logged
Deep456
Offline Offline
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2007, 12:10:12 PM »
Quote from: Menace on February 11, 2007, 10:13:10 AM
I'd demand our money back for Owen, considering they are supposed to be minted now.

Aye and buy Huntalaar and Emanuelson with that money plus 3million Big Grin
Logged
Howaythelads
Offline Offline


Ncle has no ambition, I'm off to Villa
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2007, 12:10:58 PM »
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 12:05:48 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 11:52:56 AM
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 11:44:43 AM
I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Butt

I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Parka

Are you on drugs again?
and
Why do u hate Parker so much?

Never done drugs.

Don't hate Parker, just don't think he's very good.

Why do you hate Butt so much? Or is it as I suspect and that it's because you don't think he's very good, which is the same as I feel about Parker of course, yet I don't accuse you of hating Butt.
Logged
Gemmill and Alex abusing members
https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=36633.msg725085#msg725085
Howaythelads
Offline Offline


Ncle has no ambition, I'm off to Villa
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2007, 12:12:04 PM »
Quote from: Nate on February 11, 2007, 12:08:37 PM
Reo-Coker would be somewhat of a gamble considering he's only performed consistently for one season.. and even if West Ham are relegated, as the England u21 captain, he's sure to have an overinflated price tag. I'm undecided about Sidwell, he'd only leave Reading for guarenteed first team football and i don't know wether he's good enough to merit it.

Agreed. It pays to be wary when signing players for big money who have only had one decent season at the top level. Applies to Sidwell and Reo-Coker imo. Among others.
Logged
Gemmill and Alex abusing members
https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=36633.msg725085#msg725085
nufcjmc
Offline Offline
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2007, 12:13:21 PM »
smart money would be on emre due to the whole racist thing, butt isnt safe either as he is 31 now? 32/33 next season so we need to think about replacements. As for parker I agree he hasn't been the player we had last season but he is only 27 so would be a better one for the future than butt plus roeder made him the captain so unless parker wanted to leave nothing is going to change.
Logged
ElDiablo
Online Online


HIT IT!!!!!11
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2007, 12:15:11 PM »
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 12:12:04 PM
Quote from: Nate on February 11, 2007, 12:08:37 PM
Reo-Coker would be somewhat of a gamble considering he's only performed consistently for one season.. and even if West Ham are relegated, as the England u21 captain, he's sure to have an overinflated price tag. I'm undecided about Sidwell, he'd only leave Reading for guarenteed first team football and i don't know wether he's good enough to merit it.

Agreed. It pays to be wary when signing players for big money who have only had one decent season at the top level. Applies to Sidwell and Reo-Coker imo. Among others.

Sidwell's on a free as i'm sure you know, only reason I mentioned him. Otherwise he shouldn't be touched.
Logged
NUFC06
Online Online


HE WILL BE HERE FOR A LONG TIME...
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2007, 12:18:45 PM »
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 12:10:58 PM
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 12:05:48 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 11:52:56 AM
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 11:44:43 AM
I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Butt

I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Parka

Are you on drugs again?
and
Why do u hate Parker so much?

Never done drugs.

Don't hate Parker, just don't think he's very good.

Why do you hate Butt so much? Or is it as I suspect and that it's because you don't think he's very good, which is the same as I feel about Parker of course, yet I don't accuse you of hating Butt.

I dont hate Butt i just think that he is past his best,he is 32 and he dont have too much time ahead of him so thats why we must have a back up for him
Parker on the other hand is 26 and the best years of his career are in front of him
Recently he was poor but every player has his ups and downs
I dont think that he is as poor as you say he is...
But every person has his own opinion so...
Logged


THE FUTURE…REMEMBER ONE THING-THEY ARE ONLY 20
Howaythelads
Offline Offline


Ncle has no ambition, I'm off to Villa
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2007, 12:20:29 PM »
Quote from: ElDiablo on February 11, 2007, 12:15:11 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 12:12:04 PM
Quote from: Nate on February 11, 2007, 12:08:37 PM
Reo-Coker would be somewhat of a gamble considering he's only performed consistently for one season.. and even if West Ham are relegated, as the England u21 captain, he's sure to have an overinflated price tag. I'm undecided about Sidwell, he'd only leave Reading for guarenteed first team football and i don't know wether he's good enough to merit it.

Agreed. It pays to be wary when signing players for big money who have only had one decent season at the top level. Applies to Sidwell and Reo-Coker imo. Among others.

Sidwell's on a free as i'm sure you know, only reason I mentioned him. Otherwise he shouldn't be touched.

I actually pay very little attention to whether players are on a free or not as whatever is saved in the fee to a club will likely to go the player in signing on fee and wages, plus agent pay-off anyway. They still cost.
Logged
Gemmill and Alex abusing members
https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=36633.msg725085#msg725085
Howaythelads
Offline Offline


Ncle has no ambition, I'm off to Villa
« Reply #21 on: February 11, 2007, 12:21:20 PM »
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 12:18:45 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 12:10:58 PM
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 12:05:48 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 11:52:56 AM
Quote from: NUFC06 on February 11, 2007, 11:44:43 AM
I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Butt

I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Parka

Are you on drugs again?
and
Why do u hate Parker so much?

Never done drugs.

Don't hate Parker, just don't think he's very good.

Why do you hate Butt so much? Or is it as I suspect and that it's because you don't think he's very good, which is the same as I feel about Parker of course, yet I don't accuse you of hating Butt.

I dont hate Butt i just think that he is past his best,he is 32 and he dont have too much time ahead of him so thats why we must have a back up for him
Parker on the other hand is 26 and the best years of his career are in front of him
Recently he was poor but every player has his ups and downs
I dont think that he is as poor as you say he is...
But every person has his own opinion so...

Right. So stop the daft remarks about drugs and hating Parker just because I have a different opinion to yours.

Cheers
Logged
Gemmill and Alex abusing members
https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=36633.msg725085#msg725085
ElDiablo
Online Online


HIT IT!!!!!11
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2007, 12:27:25 PM »
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 12:20:29 PM
Quote from: ElDiablo on February 11, 2007, 12:15:11 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 12:12:04 PM
Quote from: Nate on February 11, 2007, 12:08:37 PM
Reo-Coker would be somewhat of a gamble considering he's only performed consistently for one season.. and even if West Ham are relegated, as the England u21 captain, he's sure to have an overinflated price tag. I'm undecided about Sidwell, he'd only leave Reading for guarenteed first team football and i don't know wether he's good enough to merit it.

Agreed. It pays to be wary when signing players for big money who have only had one decent season at the top level. Applies to Sidwell and Reo-Coker imo. Among others.

Sidwell's on a free as i'm sure you know, only reason I mentioned him. Otherwise he shouldn't be touched.

I actually pay very little attention to whether players are on a free or not as whatever is saved in the fee to a club will likely to go the player in signing on fee and wages, plus agent pay-off anyway. They still cost.

What and if we'd payed a fee the player wouldn't have got his signing on fee and the agent wouldn't have been payed off?

Including these payments however, I'd see us getting Sidwell in on a free a tidy deal.
Logged
Howaythelads
Offline Offline


Ncle has no ambition, I'm off to Villa
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2007, 12:28:54 PM »
Quote from: ElDiablo on February 11, 2007, 12:27:25 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 12:20:29 PM
Quote from: ElDiablo on February 11, 2007, 12:15:11 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on February 11, 2007, 12:12:04 PM
Quote from: Nate on February 11, 2007, 12:08:37 PM
Reo-Coker would be somewhat of a gamble considering he's only performed consistently for one season.. and even if West Ham are relegated, as the England u21 captain, he's sure to have an overinflated price tag. I'm undecided about Sidwell, he'd only leave Reading for guarenteed first team football and i don't know wether he's good enough to merit it.

Agreed. It pays to be wary when signing players for big money who have only had one decent season at the top level. Applies to Sidwell and Reo-Coker imo. Among others.

Sidwell's on a free as i'm sure you know, only reason I mentioned him. Otherwise he shouldn't be touched.

I actually pay very little attention to whether players are on a free or not as whatever is saved in the fee to a club will likely to go the player in signing on fee and wages, plus agent pay-off anyway. They still cost.

What and if we'd payed a fee the player wouldn't have got his signing on fee and the agent wouldn't have been payed off?

Including these payments however, I'd see us getting Sidwell in on a free a tidy deal.

Well I'm not a football insider or an agent but I thought they get their fees even if the club gets a fee, the difference is that their fees will be bigger if the club doesn't get a fee. It may not add up to as much but there is no such thing really as a free player.
Logged
Gemmill and Alex abusing members
https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=36633.msg725085#msg725085
bobyule
Writers Group
Offline Offline
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2007, 12:38:50 PM »
Reo-Coker yes please, but we'd need to fork out more than £5 million surely.

As for Owen, no-one would be silly enough to match the wages that we're paying him, or the fee that we shelled out.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  

« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Theme by m3talc0re. Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC MySQL | PHP | XHTML | CSS
Page created in 0.318 seconds with 18 queries.