NUFC Forum - Newcastle United Supporters Message Board

I get the impression Boum is't settled tbh, maybe explains why he's been having a poor run of form

[/quot

just a question, who"s the guy in the middle of the trio in your pics..................cus it"s the spit of me...................handsome devil aint he

Wanker

idle speculation on a sunday but.........

if you knew a BIG club was in for you and you had the chance for a lucrative move as an Xmas present but that the deal hinged on the buying club's under fire boss still being there at Xmas.....would you consider putting a penalty over the bar?

How can you call him a prick? Did he come begging for a move to us, telling us how great he was? No he didn't, our manager and scouts thought he was a very good player, so don't call a model pro a prick just on the basis that he hasn't had the impact we expected.

Steve bruce isnt even available(thank god),look at the people who are though:

Redknapp 
Perrin 
the list goes on

Kluivert only has himself to blame for his own personal career, not Shearer, not no-one. Just himself. Had he kept in shape off the pitch, he would have played more. Does anyone seriously believe any manager would pick Ameobi ahead of a fully fit Kluivert?

He didn't do enough to say "I want a first-team place". He just expected it because of his name and reputation.

As for Shearer weilding too much power, of course he does, and the club have their reasons for that. One day he'll manage the club, his veins course with black & white blood, basically the club can pin their shirt on him and he won't let anyone down.

The question is, is his influence positive, or negative? Well lets look at on the field for starters, 197 goals in less than 400 games, suggests his influence is positive. Off it he's served this club well, making the club millions and all the youngsters look up to him and speak highly of him, ask Chopra, whom has basically had England's greatest striker of his generation helping him since a 14 year old bairn, the same goes for Shola, Taylor and other youngsters.

Shearer of course played a massive hand in getting Owen, Luque, Parker and Nobby here. Basically he's a club ambassador and is someone that can be trusted to deliver the goods on and off the pitch, he's a local lad, the fans love him, he's the future of the club.

It's a sheer myth that he runs things, if he did, would he have allowed Solano to leave? Speed, his big mate? Beattie would be here if Shearer really did run things.

He gets consulted and offers advice, but hey, wouldn't you ask someone like Shearer for advice on a footballing nature?

What the club have done that is wrong, is they have promoted this myth by flogging Shearer's name, naming a bar after him and basically alluding to the fact he has influence at St. James' Park.

They promote it and don't make any apologies.

Fans should stop reading between the lines and always thinking the worst. I trust Shearer 100%, at least he has the club's best interests at heart, unlike others.

No-one really knows Shearer, they just read what people like Kluivert, biased people, have to say and of course the Dutchman is going to peddle his crap because it sells, it absolves him of blame.

I was a fan of Kluivert and was one of those who thought he'd go on to make a big splash at St. James' Park. However, the size of his frame towards the end of his time here, was a shocking statement that he couldn't give a damn about NUFC, his game or his own fitness.

Shearer? The model professional, Kluivert isn't fit to lace his boots never mind speak ill of him.

Kluivert only has himself to blame for his own personal career, not Shearer, not no-one. Just himself. Had he kept in shape off the pitch, he would have played more. Does anyone seriously believe any manager would pick Ameobi ahead of a fully fit Kluivert?

He didn't do enough to say "I want a first-team place". He just expected it because of his name and reputation.

As for Shearer weilding too much power, of course he does, and the club have their reasons for that. One day he'll manage the club, his veins course with black & white blood, basically the club can pin their shirt on him and he won't let anyone down.

The question is, is his influence positive, or negative? Well lets look at on the field for starters, 197 goals in less than 400 games, suggests his influence is positive. Off it he's served this club well, making the club millions and all the youngsters look up to him and speak highly of him, ask Chopra, whom has basically had England's greatest striker of his generation helping him since a 14 year old bairn, the same goes for Shola, Taylor and other youngsters.

Shearer of course played a massive hand in getting Owen, Luque, Parker and Nobby here. Basically he's a club ambassador and is someone that can be trusted to deliver the goods on and off the pitch, he's a local lad, the fans love him, he's the future of the club.

It's a sheer myth that he runs things, if he did, would he have allowed Solano to leave? Speed, his big mate? Beattie would be here if Shearer really did run things.

He gets consulted and offers advice, but hey, wouldn't you ask someone like Shearer for advice on a footballing nature?

What the club have done that is wrong, is they have promoted this myth by flogging Shearer's name, naming a bar after him and basically alluding to the fact he has influence at St. James' Park.

They promote it and don't make any apologies.

Fans should stop reading between the lines and always thinking the worst. I trust Shearer 100%, at least he has the club's best interests at heart, unlike others.

No-one really knows Shearer, they just read what people like Kluivert, biased people, have to say and of course the Dutchman is going to peddle his crap because it sells, it absolves him of blame.

I was a fan of Kluivert and was one of those who thought he'd go on to make a big splash at St. James' Park. However, the size of his frame towards the end of his time here, was a shocking statement that he couldn't give a damn about NUFC, his game or his own fitness.

Shearer? The model professional, Kluivert isn't fit to lace his boots never mind speak ill of him.

Kluivert only has himself to blame for his own personal career, not Shearer, not no-one. Just himself. Had he kept in shape off the pitch, he would have played more. Does anyone seriously believe any manager would pick Ameobi ahead of a fully fit Kluivert?

He didn't do enough to say "I want a first-team place". He just expected it because of his name and reputation.

As for Shearer weilding too much power, of course he does, and the club have their reasons for that. One day he'll manage the club, his veins course with black & white blood, basically the club can pin their shirt on him and he won't let anyone down.

The question is, is his influence positive, or negative? Well lets look at on the field for starters, 197 goals in less than 400 games, suggests his influence is positive. Off it he's served this club well, making the club millions and all the youngsters look up to him and speak highly of him, ask Chopra, whom has basically had England's greatest striker of his generation helping him since a 14 year old bairn, the same goes for Shola, Taylor and other youngsters.

Shearer of course played a massive hand in getting Owen, Luque, Parker and Nobby here. Basically he's a club ambassador and is someone that can be trusted to deliver the goods on and off the pitch, he's a local lad, the fans love him, he's the future of the club.

It's a sheer myth that he runs things, if he did, would he have allowed Solano to leave? Speed, his big mate? Beattie would be here if Shearer really did run things.

He gets consulted and offers advice, but hey, wouldn't you ask someone like Shearer for advice on a footballing nature?

What the club have done that is wrong, is they have promoted this myth by flogging Shearer's name, naming a bar after him and basically alluding to the fact he has influence at St. James' Park.

They promote it and don't make any apologies.

Fans should stop reading between the lines and always thinking the worst. I trust Shearer 100%, at least he has the club's best interests at heart, unlike others.

No-one really knows Shearer, they just read what people like Kluivert, biased people, have to say and of course the Dutchman is going to peddle his crap because it sells, it absolves him of blame.

I was a fan of Kluivert and was one of those who thought he'd go on to make a big splash at St. James' Park. However, the size of his frame towards the end of his time here, was a shocking statement that he couldn't give a damn about NUFC, his game or his own fitness.

Shearer? The model professional, Kluivert isn't fit to lace his boots never mind speak ill of him.

He doesn't have a ****ing broken arm he has a slight strain and it's completely different, completely ****ing different to a 9-5 job it's a job in professional football so don't ever make that comparison again please. If I was a footballer and I had a strain but had already travelled to London, I'd stick around and watch the match! Like when Bellamy travelled to London and fell out with Souness, he didn't **** off home he sat on the sidelines! That's because Bellamy had time for the club and actually enjoyed watching this club play.