NUFC Forum

Newcastle-Online Forum => NUFC Forum => Topic started by: Mick on October 01, 2005, 10:35:48 PM



Title: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 01, 2005, 10:35:48 PM
Here's a blank cheque for those who think we should keep Souness.

It's a dead easy question, try to make me and a few others believe we're wrong.  I think we all want the club to do well and play good winning football, convince me he can and will turn things around.

Please doubters, let them say what they want without getting into them because I’m really interested in knowing what I’m missing.

Why should we keep him? 



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: jonnyhall on October 01, 2005, 10:38:18 PM
i am not saying he can.

i am saying that he hasnt had the chance. if solano, emre, dyer and luque return, things could improve.

i dont think souness should be judged on the midfield he has been putting out earlier. wait until the 'big' midfielders return


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Shak on October 01, 2005, 10:47:53 PM
He isn't the man to bring us to the top level, obviously.

We will not get a manager who is anything but British, much as we may need one.

Who would you replace him with?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: toonarmy1810 on October 01, 2005, 10:59:44 PM
Heres a few reasons why we should keep him

Hes a proper manager, with proper players who play proper football on a proper pitch in front of proper fans in a proper city with a proper river which leads into a proper sea with proper fish and proper boats with proper fishermen with proper nets...........................................

Sack the proper turd


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: madras on October 01, 2005, 11:00:10 PM
think alternatives,also think what he's got shot of and what hes replaced them with.personally happy with the personnel change but waiting to see if it works.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 01, 2005, 11:01:05 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 01, 2005, 10:47:53 PM
He isn't the man to bring us to the top level, obviously.

We will not get a manager who is anything but British, much as we may need one.

Who would you replace him with?


https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=6300.0


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Shak on October 01, 2005, 11:10:43 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 01, 2005, 11:01:05 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 01, 2005, 10:47:53 PM
He isn't the man to bring us to the top level, obviously.

We will not get a manager who is anything but British, much as we may need one.

Who would you replace him with?


https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=6300.0


Seen the thread, voted and all.

Hitzfeld and Le Guen I'd take, but we won't be getting them.

Wouldn't want any of the others.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: guinness_fiend on October 01, 2005, 11:20:52 PM
This was meant to be a short post - can you tell I'm avoiding writing an assignment? :)

---

I am not a fan of Souness by any stretch of the imagination, and when I first heard that he was appointed as our new manager my heart sank.  All I ever want to do is watch Newcastle play entertaining football and maybe win at least something worth shouting about - to me Souness seemed to personify the antithesis of what I believe a successful and respected manager should be.  Souness’ history and reputation, both as a player and a manager, went before him and it did not sit well with me whatsoever.  I was hoping for a Mourinho-esque manager with charisma, tactical ability, unparalleled player-management skills and a gift of gab that could persuade even the most sceptical player of donning the famous black-and-white shirt with pride.  Sure, under Bobby we had an awful start to last season, but when he was sacked it left a decidedly sour taste in my mouth.

For the first time in memory I genuinely wanted us to do badly so that Souness would be ejected from the club as quickly as he was rushed in.  That is what I was willing to put up with in the blind hope that our next manager would be of a higher calibre.

However, as much as it pains me to say it, since Souness has taken over I firmly believe that the club has started to change for the better.  Before his critics decide to decapitate me, let me explain.  Position-wise, we are no better than we were under Robson, that is true – but where Souness has inexplicably come into his own has been with his recent purchases and the apparent change in team spirit.  I think that the majority of Toon fans will admit, if with a little resistance, that sales of the mercenary that was Bernard, the lazy happy-to-pick-up-an-over-inflated-weekly-paycheque-slash-con-artist otherwise known as Kluivert and the disruptive influences of Bellamy and Robert was a demonstration of pure balls for the want of a better phrase.  All managers have ‘problem children’ in their team and are happy to put up with them if they play well.  Well, we had a lot of problem children on our team and week-in week-out they failed to produce the goods.  By shedding the dead-weights above Souness showed that a) he has no time for disruption in his dressing room and b) no-one’s place in the squad is guaranteed (ok, Ameobi’s seems to be, somewhat inexplicably).

His further sales of Ambrose, O’Brien, Jenas and the loaning out of Butt again demonstrated Souness’ desire to start HIS squad from scratch, rather than iron the creases out of an inherited team with embarrassingly well-documented issues.  Since he has taken over there have been no incidents off-pitch that have made me ashamed to be a Toon fan.  No front page headlines, no negative press.  The incident between Dyer and Bowyer was not the fault of Souness, it was solely the fault of the hothead Bowyer and his tendency to see red.  The press conference that followed was a tad nauseous, with the pair shaking hands and smiling cheesily like they were the best of buddies, but since Bowyer has put in some cracking performances and has always given 100% - despite rumours that he is no longer wanted at the club.  As such, the attitude of each player seems to have improved ten-fold over the last year, with Boumsong in particular, who admittedly has started this season noticeably less confident than he did last year, being an exemplary professional both on and off the pitch.

Souness’ purchases have largely been positive moves, with Emre, Luque, Owen and Solano in particular being worthy additions to any Premiership team with aspirations of European qualification.  Many people slate Boumsong, but I for one rate him as one of our strongest and dedicated players and believe that he and Taylor will provide the base to build a solid defence around during the course of the next year or two.  Krul looks like he might be a shrewd buy given his ever-increasing under-21 international experience and Clark, despite his age, has shown that he has still got the legs and desire to prove himself in the top-flight.  As for Parker, what can I say, if he is not an England regular by the World Cup it will beggar belief.  He has the potential to be our Gerrard, Lampard or Keane given that he keeps performing like he has been.  In regards to Babayaro and Faye, they are both players of quality yet they have failed to perform since coming to St. James’.  That is not Souness’ fault – out of the players that he has purchased these are the two duds.

Sure, we have a small squad compared to the likes of, well, everyone really, but headway IS being made.  We do not have the financial ability of Chelsea to buy an entire squad pre-season, so we will have to make do with what we have until the transfer window in January.  At the end of the day, it is not Souness’ fault that his players are getting injured, for if he is to be believed it looks as if the training ground is largely responsible for our wide-scale hamstring problem.  If that is the case, there is very little that he can do.  He is hardly going to demand the building of a new training ground.  He IS, however, making the right decision in not rushing Emre, Luque, Dyer et al back – they need time to recover in order to make the impact that we are all hoping they can on the squad.

I will concede that at the moment we are not playing particularly attractive football, and Souness’ tactics leave a lot to be desired.  But, what we have started doing over the past few games, albeit against weaker opposition, is grind out results.  Today’s result was poor, but we still managed to get a point with a large number of our first team missing.  Christ, even our opener against Arsenal was ours for the taking until Jenas’ unfair dismissal.  The signs are there that we could turn the season around.  At the moment, taking injuries into consideration, our first eleven is a mid-table squad - which is exactly where we are sitting at the moment.

Ultimately, I am never going to be a fan of Souness ‘the man’, but as a manager he has not been as terrible as I imagined he would be.  What I am asking of everyone is to judge him on a full season in charge.  Another confidence-shattering dismissal is not what we need at the moment.  We need cohesion and self-belief.  If and when our squad returns to what I would call strength we remain mid-table - then we can talk about looking for a new manager over the summer.  Until that day we should support our manager, our players and our team until the final whistle of the season.  I do not want to spend the season complaining when I can be cheering the lads on at the weekend.  There is a time and a place for complaining twenty-fours hours a day, and I am not ready for marriage just yet... ;) 


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: jonnyhall on October 01, 2005, 11:26:09 PM
Quote from: guinness_fiend on October 01, 2005, 11:20:52 PM
This was meant to be a short post - can you tell I'm avoiding writing an assignment? :)

---

I am not a fan of Souness by any stretch of the imagination, and when I first heard that he was appointed as our new manager my heart sank.  All I ever want to do is watch Newcastle play entertaining football and maybe win at least something worth shouting about - to me Souness seemed to personify the antithesis of what I believe a successful and respected manager should be.  Souness’ history and reputation, both as a player and a manager, went before him and it did not sit well with me whatsoever.  I was hoping for a Mourinho-esque manager with charisma, tactical ability, unparalleled player-management skills and a gift of gab that could persuade even the most sceptical player of donning the famous black-and-white shirt with pride.  Sure, under Bobby we had an awful start to last season, but when he was sacked it left a decidedly sour taste in my mouth.

For the first time in memory I genuinely wanted us to do badly so that Souness would be ejected from the club as quickly as he was rushed in.  That is what I was willing to put up with in the blind hope that our next manager would be of a higher calibre.

However, as much as it pains me to say it, since Souness has taken over I firmly believe that the club has started to change for the better.  Before his critics decide to decapitate me, let me explain.  Position-wise, we are no better than we were under Robson, that is true – but where Souness has inexplicably come into his own has been with his recent purchases and the apparent change in team spirit.  I think that the majority of Toon fans will admit, if with a little resistance, that sales of the mercenary that was Bernard, the lazy happy-to-pick-up-an-over-inflated-weekly-paycheque-slash-con-artist otherwise known as Kluivert and the disruptive influences of Bellamy and Robert was a demonstration of pure balls for the want of a better phrase.  All managers have ‘problem children’ in their team and are happy to put up with them if they play well.  Well, we had a lot of problem children on our team and week-in week-out they failed to produce the goods.  By shedding the dead-weights above Souness showed that a) he has no time for disruption in his dressing room and b) no-one’s place in the squad is guaranteed (ok, Ameobi’s seems to be, somewhat inexplicably).

His further sales of Ambrose, O’Brien, Jenas and the loaning out of Butt again demonstrated Souness’ desire to start HIS squad from scratch, rather than iron the creases out of an inherited team with embarrassingly well-documented issues.  Since he has taken over there have been no incidents off-pitch that have made me ashamed to be a Toon fan.  No front page headlines, no negative press.  The incident between Dyer and Bowyer was not the fault of Souness, it was solely the fault of the hothead Bowyer and his tendency to see red.  The press conference that followed was a tad nauseous, with the pair shaking hands and smiling cheesily like they were the best of buddies, but since Bowyer has put in some cracking performances and has always given 100% - despite rumours that he is no longer wanted at the club.  As such, the attitude of each player seems to have improved ten-fold over the last year, with Boumsong in particular, who admittedly has started this season noticeably less confident than he did last year, being an exemplary professional both on and off the pitch.

Souness’ purchases have largely been positive moves, with Emre, Luque, Owen and Solano in particular being worthy additions to any Premiership team with aspirations of European qualification.  Many people slate Boumsong, but I for one rate him as one of our strongest and dedicated players and believe that he and Taylor will provide the base to build a solid defence around during the course of the next year or two.  Krul looks like he might be a shrewd buy given his ever-increasing under-21 international experience and Clark, despite his age, has shown that he has still got the legs and desire to prove himself in the top-flight.  As for Parker, what can I say, if he is not an England regular by the World Cup it will beggar belief.  He has the potential to be our Gerrard, Lampard or Keane given that he keeps performing like he has been.  In regards to Babayaro and Faye, they are both players of quality yet they have failed to perform since coming to St. James’.  That is not Souness’ fault – out of the players that he has purchased these are the two duds.

Sure, we have a small squad compared to the likes of, well, everyone really, but headway IS being made.  We do not have the financial ability of Chelsea to buy an entire squad pre-season, so we will have to make do with what we have until the transfer window in January.  At the end of the day, it is not Souness’ fault that his players are getting injured, for if he is to be believed it looks as if the training ground is largely responsible for our wide-scale hamstring problem.  If that is the case, there is very little that he can do.  He is hardly going to demand the building of a new training ground.  He IS, however, making the right decision in not rushing Emre, Luque, Dyer et al back – they need time to recover in order to make the impact that we are all hoping they can on the squad.

I will concede that at the moment we are not playing particularly attractive football, and Souness’ tactics leave a lot to be desired.  But, what we have started doing over the past few games, albeit against weaker opposition, is grind out results.  Today’s result was poor, but we still managed to get a point with a large number of our first team missing.  Christ, even our opener against Arsenal was ours for the taking until Jenas’ unfair dismissal.  The signs are there that we could turn the season around.  At the moment, taking injuries into consideration, our first eleven is a mid-table squad - which is exactly where we are sitting at the moment.

Ultimately, I am never going to be a fan of Souness ‘the man’, but as a manager he has not been as terrible as I imagined he would be.  What I am asking of everyone is to judge him on a full season in charge.  Another confidence-shattering dismissal is not what we need at the moment.  We need cohesion and self-belief.  If and when our squad returns to what I would call strength we remain mid-table - then we can talk about looking for a new manager over the summer.  Until that day we should support our manager, our players and our team until the final whistle of the season.  I do not want to spend the season complaining when I can be cheering the lads on at the weekend.  There is a time and a place for complaining twenty-fours hours a day, and I am not ready for marriage just yet... ;) 




i was just about to say that  :wink: :wink:

good post mate. i agree 100%!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Shak on October 01, 2005, 11:41:46 PM
Quote from: guinness_fiend on October 01, 2005, 11:20:52 PM
This was meant to be a short post - can you tell I'm avoiding writing an assignment? :)

---

I am not a fan of Souness by any stretch of the imagination, and when I first heard that he was appointed as our new manager my heart sank.  All I ever want to do is watch Newcastle play entertaining football and maybe win at least something worth shouting about - to me Souness seemed to personify the antithesis of what I believe a successful and respected manager should be.  Souness’ history and reputation, both as a player and a manager, went before him and it did not sit well with me whatsoever.  I was hoping for a Mourinho-esque manager with charisma, tactical ability, unparalleled player-management skills and a gift of gab that could persuade even the most sceptical player of donning the famous black-and-white shirt with pride.  Sure, under Bobby we had an awful start to last season, but when he was sacked it left a decidedly sour taste in my mouth.

For the first time in memory I genuinely wanted us to do badly so that Souness would be ejected from the club as quickly as he was rushed in.  That is what I was willing to put up with in the blind hope that our next manager would be of a higher calibre.

However, as much as it pains me to say it, since Souness has taken over I firmly believe that the club has started to change for the better.  Before his critics decide to decapitate me, let me explain.  Position-wise, we are no better than we were under Robson, that is true – but where Souness has inexplicably come into his own has been with his recent purchases and the apparent change in team spirit.  I think that the majority of Toon fans will admit, if with a little resistance, that sales of the mercenary that was Bernard, the lazy happy-to-pick-up-an-over-inflated-weekly-paycheque-slash-con-artist otherwise known as Kluivert and the disruptive influences of Bellamy and Robert was a demonstration of pure balls for the want of a better phrase.  All managers have ‘problem children’ in their team and are happy to put up with them if they play well.  Well, we had a lot of problem children on our team and week-in week-out they failed to produce the goods.  By shedding the dead-weights above Souness showed that a) he has no time for disruption in his dressing room and b) no-one’s place in the squad is guaranteed (ok, Ameobi’s seems to be, somewhat inexplicably).

His further sales of Ambrose, O’Brien, Jenas and the loaning out of Butt again demonstrated Souness’ desire to start HIS squad from scratch, rather than iron the creases out of an inherited team with embarrassingly well-documented issues.  Since he has taken over there have been no incidents off-pitch that have made me ashamed to be a Toon fan.  No front page headlines, no negative press.  The incident between Dyer and Bowyer was not the fault of Souness, it was solely the fault of the hothead Bowyer and his tendency to see red.  The press conference that followed was a tad nauseous, with the pair shaking hands and smiling cheesily like they were the best of buddies, but since Bowyer has put in some cracking performances and has always given 100% - despite rumours that he is no longer wanted at the club.  As such, the attitude of each player seems to have improved ten-fold over the last year, with Boumsong in particular, who admittedly has started this season noticeably less confident than he did last year, being an exemplary professional both on and off the pitch.

Souness’ purchases have largely been positive moves, with Emre, Luque, Owen and Solano in particular being worthy additions to any Premiership team with aspirations of European qualification.  Many people slate Boumsong, but I for one rate him as one of our strongest and dedicated players and believe that he and Taylor will provide the base to build a solid defence around during the course of the next year or two.  Krul looks like he might be a shrewd buy given his ever-increasing under-21 international experience and Clark, despite his age, has shown that he has still got the legs and desire to prove himself in the top-flight.  As for Parker, what can I say, if he is not an England regular by the World Cup it will beggar belief.  He has the potential to be our Gerrard, Lampard or Keane given that he keeps performing like he has been.  In regards to Babayaro and Faye, they are both players of quality yet they have failed to perform since coming to St. James’.  That is not Souness’ fault – out of the players that he has purchased these are the two duds.

Sure, we have a small squad compared to the likes of, well, everyone really, but headway IS being made.  We do not have the financial ability of Chelsea to buy an entire squad pre-season, so we will have to make do with what we have until the transfer window in January.  At the end of the day, it is not Souness’ fault that his players are getting injured, for if he is to be believed it looks as if the training ground is largely responsible for our wide-scale hamstring problem.  If that is the case, there is very little that he can do.  He is hardly going to demand the building of a new training ground.  He IS, however, making the right decision in not rushing Emre, Luque, Dyer et al back – they need time to recover in order to make the impact that we are all hoping they can on the squad.

I will concede that at the moment we are not playing particularly attractive football, and Souness’ tactics leave a lot to be desired.  But, what we have started doing over the past few games, albeit against weaker opposition, is grind out results.  Today’s result was poor, but we still managed to get a point with a large number of our first team missing.  Christ, even our opener against Arsenal was ours for the taking until Jenas’ unfair dismissal.  The signs are there that we could turn the season around.  At the moment, taking injuries into consideration, our first eleven is a mid-table squad - which is exactly where we are sitting at the moment.

Ultimately, I am never going to be a fan of Souness ‘the man’, but as a manager he has not been as terrible as I imagined he would be.  What I am asking of everyone is to judge him on a full season in charge.  Another confidence-shattering dismissal is not what we need at the moment.  We need cohesion and self-belief.  If and when our squad returns to what I would call strength we remain mid-table - then we can talk about looking for a new manager over the summer.  Until that day we should support our manager, our players and our team until the final whistle of the season.  I do not want to spend the season complaining when I can be cheering the lads on at the weekend.  There is a time and a place for complaining twenty-fours hours a day, and I am not ready for marriage just yet... ;) 



A truly excellent post.

I don't think many people are enjoying our performances of late, but Rome wasn't built in a day, and they didn't have to clean up a mess before they started building there either.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Toon_Crazy on October 01, 2005, 11:57:59 PM
Quote from: guinness_fiend on October 01, 2005, 11:20:52 PM
This was meant to be a short post - can you tell I'm avoiding writing an assignment? :)

---

I am not a fan of Souness by any stretch of the imagination, and when I first heard that he was appointed as our new manager my heart sank.  All I ever want to do is watch Newcastle play entertaining football and maybe win at least something worth shouting about - to me Souness seemed to personify the antithesis of what I believe a successful and respected manager should be.  Souness’ history and reputation, both as a player and a manager, went before him and it did not sit well with me whatsoever.  I was hoping for a Mourinho-esque manager with charisma, tactical ability, unparalleled player-management skills and a gift of gab that could persuade even the most sceptical player of donning the famous black-and-white shirt with pride.  Sure, under Bobby we had an awful start to last season, but when he was sacked it left a decidedly sour taste in my mouth.

For the first time in memory I genuinely wanted us to do badly so that Souness would be ejected from the club as quickly as he was rushed in.  That is what I was willing to put up with in the blind hope that our next manager would be of a higher calibre.

However, as much as it pains me to say it, since Souness has taken over I firmly believe that the club has started to change for the better.  Before his critics decide to decapitate me, let me explain.  Position-wise, we are no better than we were under Robson, that is true – but where Souness has inexplicably come into his own has been with his recent purchases and the apparent change in team spirit.  I think that the majority of Toon fans will admit, if with a little resistance, that sales of the mercenary that was Bernard, the lazy happy-to-pick-up-an-over-inflated-weekly-paycheque-slash-con-artist otherwise known as Kluivert and the disruptive influences of Bellamy and Robert was a demonstration of pure balls for the want of a better phrase.  All managers have ‘problem children’ in their team and are happy to put up with them if they play well.  Well, we had a lot of problem children on our team and week-in week-out they failed to produce the goods.  By shedding the dead-weights above Souness showed that a) he has no time for disruption in his dressing room and b) no-one’s place in the squad is guaranteed (ok, Ameobi’s seems to be, somewhat inexplicably).

His further sales of Ambrose, O’Brien, Jenas and the loaning out of Butt again demonstrated Souness’ desire to start HIS squad from scratch, rather than iron the creases out of an inherited team with embarrassingly well-documented issues.  Since he has taken over there have been no incidents off-pitch that have made me ashamed to be a Toon fan.  No front page headlines, no negative press.  The incident between Dyer and Bowyer was not the fault of Souness, it was solely the fault of the hothead Bowyer and his tendency to see red.  The press conference that followed was a tad nauseous, with the pair shaking hands and smiling cheesily like they were the best of buddies, but since Bowyer has put in some cracking performances and has always given 100% - despite rumours that he is no longer wanted at the club.  As such, the attitude of each player seems to have improved ten-fold over the last year, with Boumsong in particular, who admittedly has started this season noticeably less confident than he did last year, being an exemplary professional both on and off the pitch.

Souness’ purchases have largely been positive moves, with Emre, Luque, Owen and Solano in particular being worthy additions to any Premiership team with aspirations of European qualification.  Many people slate Boumsong, but I for one rate him as one of our strongest and dedicated players and believe that he and Taylor will provide the base to build a solid defence around during the course of the next year or two.  Krul looks like he might be a shrewd buy given his ever-increasing under-21 international experience and Clark, despite his age, has shown that he has still got the legs and desire to prove himself in the top-flight.  As for Parker, what can I say, if he is not an England regular by the World Cup it will beggar belief.  He has the potential to be our Gerrard, Lampard or Keane given that he keeps performing like he has been.  In regards to Babayaro and Faye, they are both players of quality yet they have failed to perform since coming to St. James’.  That is not Souness’ fault – out of the players that he has purchased these are the two duds.

Sure, we have a small squad compared to the likes of, well, everyone really, but headway IS being made.  We do not have the financial ability of Chelsea to buy an entire squad pre-season, so we will have to make do with what we have until the transfer window in January.  At the end of the day, it is not Souness’ fault that his players are getting injured, for if he is to be believed it looks as if the training ground is largely responsible for our wide-scale hamstring problem.  If that is the case, there is very little that he can do.  He is hardly going to demand the building of a new training ground.  He IS, however, making the right decision in not rushing Emre, Luque, Dyer et al back – they need time to recover in order to make the impact that we are all hoping they can on the squad.

I will concede that at the moment we are not playing particularly attractive football, and Souness’ tactics leave a lot to be desired.  But, what we have started doing over the past few games, albeit against weaker opposition, is grind out results.  Today’s result was poor, but we still managed to get a point with a large number of our first team missing.  Christ, even our opener against Arsenal was ours for the taking until Jenas’ unfair dismissal.  The signs are there that we could turn the season around.  At the moment, taking injuries into consideration, our first eleven is a mid-table squad - which is exactly where we are sitting at the moment.

Ultimately, I am never going to be a fan of Souness ‘the man’, but as a manager he has not been as terrible as I imagined he would be.  What I am asking of everyone is to judge him on a full season in charge.  Another confidence-shattering dismissal is not what we need at the moment.  We need cohesion and self-belief.  If and when our squad returns to what I would call strength we remain mid-table - then we can talk about looking for a new manager over the summer.  Until that day we should support our manager, our players and our team until the final whistle of the season.  I do not want to spend the season complaining when I can be cheering the lads on at the weekend.  There is a time and a place for complaining twenty-fours hours a day, and I am not ready for marriage just yet... ;) 


Top post, well finished with humour. I don't agree about the Dyer-Bowyer fight. II don't blame Bowyer FULLY nor do I blame Dyer FULLY. Both involved. Dyer was lacklustre that day and was not showing the commitment he should. TOP POST. Keep Souness!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: efcandy on October 02, 2005, 12:17:00 AM
i know someone who used to play for liverpool and galatasary under souness and says that he's a terrible manager.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Skeletor on October 02, 2005, 12:28:09 AM
Quote from: efcandy on October 02, 2005, 12:17:00 AM
i know someone who used to play for liverpool and galatasary under souness and says that he's a terrible manager.


Don't think you'd need to talk to anyone to see that personally.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Toon_Crazy on October 02, 2005, 12:34:41 AM
Quote from: efcandy on October 02, 2005, 12:17:00 AM
i know someone who used to play for liverpool and galatasary under souness and says that he's a terrible manager.

Jesus Christ! Think what you like but don't make up such shite. And if it was a player it was probably a yourth player.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 12:53:58 AM
Top Post Guinness, Best Post ive read in a long long time on here, IMO we dont have the money to get a new Manager yet, Because the new manager will want his own team etc etc. The bit where you said you heart sank was exactly how i felt, I can still remember where i was when i heard it, On my way home from work..lol... But Souness has done some good, He has got Bramble playing 10x better, When Dyer is fit he has got Dyer playing his best football. Whats impressed me the most about Souness is his Transfers, He is transforming our team, With a few more transfers like Aldo Duscher we will look a much better team.

People have to be happier that we dont get bad press any more, I used to be very embaressed going to work knowing i was gonna get a grilling by other fans down there because of something Bellamy done or something Robert said. The fact is we needed a big shake up and Souness seems to be getting somewhere.

IMO his buys have been great, Parker,Emre,Luque,Owen,Solano,Boumsong,Faye and Babayaro. Faye and Babayaro are So-So. But he got Faye because Butt was meant to
be KOed for the rest of the season, But with us apparently having talks with Aldo Duscher seems to suggest that we are looking to off load Faye and with us interested in Bridge it looks like Babayaro is goin to be back up.

Injuries happen to every club, Souness cant predict the future and is able to stop Owen running into Taylor. Its just bad luck that it happens to be our top players out. It maybe our £9m training ground?

IMHO i think Souness should be given time to get his team fit, IF we are still grinding out a draw at pompey with a full squad then it will be time for Souness to go.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wiley on October 02, 2005, 08:27:47 AM
****s sake,same old shit,we dont win and everyone starts questioning why souness is in charge and then everyone chants his name when we win  blueupset.gif

judge the man when we get a squad of our players,getting another manager at this stage would be a disaster!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on October 02, 2005, 09:43:06 AM
Keep him this season. Arrange the succession for the end of the season if results aren't good enough. At Christmas, if relegation threatens.

But sacking him right now would be the act of a gibbering moron.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Quote from: nufc1984 on October 02, 2005, 08:27:47 AM
****s sake,same old shit,we dont win and everyone starts questioning why souness is in charge and then everyone chants his name when we win  blueupset.gif

judge the man when we get a squad of our players,getting another manager at this stage would be a disaster!


If it's the "same old shit" Where's your reasons for keeping him?

How is he going to turn the club around from what we have now and have had for 12 months?

Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?

They are simple questions, try answering them.  Don't complain at the questions being asked just because you don't appear to be able to answer them.

If you like him so much, defend him.  I think getting rid of him ASAP would be the best thing for the club, short and long term, what makes you feel different?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NJS on October 02, 2005, 10:12:44 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
How is he going to turn the club around from what we have now and have had for 12 months?

Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


1. He has better players than 12 months ago (when all fit).

2. There are none who haven't turned us down already, are any better, or who will get anywhere near Freddie's list.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: womblemaster on October 02, 2005, 10:36:24 AM
he may not be a longterm option as manger of nufc, but with the squad hes collected this season, we are capable of a top 5 finish.

his tactics maybe naiive, but with a fully fit squad, our players could beat 70% of the league.

Personally id settle for uefa cup next season.......tbh i am disillusioned with european footy anyway, time and time again the refs penalise british teams, and are succored into the cheating tactics of continental teams.  Its pathetic and discouraging;  the refs are actually WORSE than our home grawn refs, which is unbelievable!!
eg deportivo, maked me sick to watch the bast`ds  roll about.

Think we got souness for rest of the season, so grin and bare it :)


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: buzza on October 02, 2005, 10:44:28 AM
Great post that!
I think what souness needs to make his team a little bit less brittle is another striker, even a mediocre striker would be better than what we have when owen's injured. Can't complain too much...third clean sheet and a point away from home!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Elma on October 02, 2005, 11:03:37 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?
They are simple questions, try answering them.  Don't complain at the questions being asked just because you don't appear to be able to answer them.

If you like him so much, defend him.  I think getting rid of him ASAP would be the best thing for the club, short and long term, what makes you feel different?


Because the choice of new manager you'd have mid-season (as we've discovered before) is not great. I also think that the best managers in the Prem (Mourinho excepted) are the ones who have been at their clubs the longest and been allowed to develop a team and style of play; Ferguson, Wenger, Cubishley, Allardyce.

I am not sure if Souness is the right man, but I've got no major gripes so far with his signings or his attempts to clean up the image of the club. Bearing in mind we are only eight games into his first full season and he didn't really get his new players in until after the first four of them (not entirely his fault) I think it is just too early to be calling for his head.

Yes, we're not exactly setting the world alight atm, but I'll wait a bit longer for some of our first choice to come back. We've taken eight points from the last four games (a decent average of 2 a game, with three clean sheets), got a two week break to get some players back, a couple more winnable games coming up before Chelsea, and sacking another manager without giving him a 'proper' chance at this stage will make us a laughing stock and make it even more dificult to attract anyone decent after him.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Oz Toon on October 02, 2005, 12:05:52 PM
Guiness,
mate a reasonable and intelligent argument for giving Souness the rest of the season. Now go and finish your homework cos your lecturer won't be giving you any extra time.  :tongue3:

Our 'Robson' squad was never going to win silverware. Souness was unwise when he came here saying the squad was excellent because he made a rod for his own back. Since then of course he has dismantelled the squad..

                           Bellamy (Owen) Shearer
Robert (Lugue)   Bowyer (Emre)   Jenas (Parker) Dyer (Solano)
Bernard (Babbs) Bramble              Obrien (Boum) Carr
                                       Given

Out of the starting 11 there are 7 new faces that would be in the starting team.
In my opinion the new faces seem 'proper charachters' and seem very talented. I believe there is the possibility of this team having a good combination of talent and charachter. But we haven't seen this new team play. What I have seen of Emre tells me he is a 'proper player' Lugue also looks good. Owen is class and Solano will return width and balance to the team for the first time since he was pushed out.

We need another striker, and two full backs, and if we can get Bridge that will be brilliant. So the team potentially is better than Robsons. Moreover, I have been impressed with Souness' ability in the transfer market, Faye is a dud, but Babbs has improved, and the rest look good, Boum hasn't quite convinced me but Emre looks class, Parker appears to be an absolute steal, and Luque also looks promsing. However, I'll concede Souness' tactical awareness seems average, but all things considred, the only thing that makes sense (given he has built his new team) is to give him time.

In my opinion when this team gets out on the pitch it will be a team far superior to Robson's team, and the only way to prove or disprove this is to sit tight for the rest of the season and let's watch. I'm confident we'll be in Euorope next year. Keep Souness.

Cheers
Darren





Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Rodhaminho on October 02, 2005, 12:11:23 PM
Absolute legend. Top post.  This should be put on a plack and labeled post of the century agreed whole-heartedly.!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Elma on October 02, 2005, 04:54:38 PM
Quote from: Oz Toon on October 02, 2005, 12:05:52 PM
Souness was unwise when he came here saying the squad was excellent because he made a rod for his own back. Since then of course he has dismantelled the squad..


I've said this before but I think Souness had to say that...he couldn't really come in and say, 'what a load of shit I've inherited here...'. Needed to get the players onside and it's the best way to do it. Always defend 'em in public no matter what you say to them behind closed doors.

Some people think Souness has to speak with 100% honesty everytime he steps in front of the cameras and if he doesn't (sometimes for completely operational reasons, no different to Ferguson, Wenger or any other manager) they use it as a stick to beat him with.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 04:59:38 PM
Quote from: Elma on October 02, 2005, 04:54:38 PM
Quote from: Oz Toon on October 02, 2005, 12:05:52 PM
Souness was unwise when he came here saying the squad was excellent because he made a rod for his own back. Since then of course he has dismantelled the squad..


I've said this before but I think Souness had to say that...he couldn't really come in and say, 'what a load of shit I've inherited here...'. Needed to get the players onside and it's the best way to do it. Always defend 'em in public no matter what you say to them behind closed doors.

Some people think Souness has to speak with 100% honesty everytime he steps in front of the cameras and if he doesn't (sometimes for completely operational reasons, no different to Ferguson, Wenger or any other manager) they use it as a stick to beat him with.


It looks as if you are condoning a liar, I can't think of any excuse for a football manager to tell lies.

If he's asked an awkward question he could easily refuse to answer it. 


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Elma on October 02, 2005, 05:25:55 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 04:59:38 PM
Quote from: Elma on October 02, 2005, 04:54:38 PM
Quote from: Oz Toon on October 02, 2005, 12:05:52 PM
Souness was unwise when he came here saying the squad was excellent because he made a rod for his own back. Since then of course he has dismantelled the squad..


I've said this before but I think Souness had to say that...he couldn't really come in and say, 'what a load of shit I've inherited here...'. Needed to get the players onside and it's the best way to do it. Always defend 'em in public no matter what you say to them behind closed doors.

Some people think Souness has to speak with 100% honesty everytime he steps in front of the cameras and if he doesn't (sometimes for completely operational reasons, no different to Ferguson, Wenger or any other manager) they use it as a stick to beat him with.


It looks as if you are condoning a liar, I can't think of any excuse for a football manager to tell lies.

If he's asked an awkward question he could easily refuse to answer it. 



I can. If he hadn't answered it, it wouldn't have taken a genius to work out why he was dodging the question. It's not a big lie...it's a throw away comment in the middle of an interview to defend his current players whom he needed to get performances out of when we were in a hole after Robson got the boot. I've got no problem with it and I can't see why people keep dredging it up. I was worried when he said that, that he wouldn't get rid of the shit and I'm happy that he's gone against this since and proved that he knew who wasn't good enough.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: efcandy on October 02, 2005, 05:53:08 PM
Quote from: Toon_Crazy on October 02, 2005, 12:34:41 AM
Quote from: efcandy on October 02, 2005, 12:17:00 AM
i know someone who used to play for liverpool and galatasary under souness and says that he's a terrible manager.

Jesus Christ! Think what you like but don't make up such shite. And if it was a player it was probably a yourth player.


o ye i just got bored so thought i'd pretend to know someone who used to play for liverpool.  he was always first team or bench and now plays for liverpool in the masters and he still always talks about how sh1t he is but i could of told you that myself.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Number 9 on October 02, 2005, 06:33:39 PM
Quote from: guinness_fiend on October 01, 2005, 11:20:52 PM
[B]Ultimately, I am never going to be a fan of Souness ‘the man’, but as a manager he has not been as terrible as I imagined he would be.[/B]


So your happy from under Robson we were playing good football and finished in the top 5. Compared to now where we are playing crap football and last season finished 14th under Souness?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: HTT on October 02, 2005, 07:21:42 PM
Souness will always be one game away from the sack while Newcastle manager, it's been that way since he was appointed.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: womblemaster on October 02, 2005, 08:05:59 PM
"So your happy from under Robson we were playing good football and finished in the top 5. Compared to now where we are playing crap football and last season finished 14th under Souness?"


were we playing good football when we lost 4-1 to villa?  sorry sunny ur living in dream land.  The football was shite towards the end of robsons reign.

souness has done the needed reconstruction work.  its far from finished but it looks promising so far.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Number 9 on October 02, 2005, 08:18:13 PM
Aye promising results against sides like West Ham, Pompey, Bolton & Fulham.

4-1 to Villa was the worse game under Robson - we have played far worse than that under Souness and he has still kept his job. Why?

He cant handle the players - when they dont agree with him, he goes crying to the press (he was still right to sell Bellamy btw).

He has no knowledge of tactics what so ever.

And his training methods leave something to be desired by the amount of injuries we have had.

Aye, reconstruction is going well to becoming a mid-table side.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:20:40 PM
Howay i have to disagree, Souness job was safe when we were in the Quaters of the Uefa Cup and Semi's of the Fa Cup, Injuries have been bad. I dont care what anyone says but Injuries are to blame, We have a small squad which doesnt help and im very confident that Souness will get the right players in over the next 12 months. Sacking will mean we have to let the new manager get his own team etc etc, We dont have the money for that, Let Souness do his job


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 08:20:56 PM
Quote from: toonarmy1810 on October 01, 2005, 10:59:44 PM
Heres a few reasons why we should keep him

Hes a proper manager, with proper players who play proper football on a proper pitch in front of proper fans in a proper city with a proper river which leads into a proper sea with proper fish and proper boats with proper fishermen with proper nets...........................................

Sack the proper turd


A well deserved proper smiley for you Sir

:D


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 08:23:18 PM
Quote from: womblemaster on October 02, 2005, 08:05:59 PM
"So your happy from under Robson we were playing good football and finished in the top 5. Compared to now where we are playing crap football and last season finished 14th under Souness?"


were we playing good football when we lost 4-1 to villa?   sorry sunny ur living in dream land.   The football was shite towards the end of robsons reign.

souness has done the needed reconstruction work.  its far from finished but it looks promising so far.


What's so promising about finishing 14th in the league last year and currently languishing in 12th position now?

I thought we lost 2-4 to Villa?  It's also quite funny that you should chose a Villa game to say we were crap, at least we didn't have two of our players sent off for fighting on the pitch.  We lost by two goals away which is better than a 3 goal defeat at home.  The third goal for Villa away was while we were down to 9 men, Kluivert and Bernard were both injured, the game should have been stopped before they got the crucial goal.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Number 9 on October 02, 2005, 08:24:01 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:20:40 PM
Howay i have to disagree, Souness job was safe when we were in the Quaters of the Uefa Cup and Semi's of the Fa Cup, Injuries have been bad. I dont care what anyone says but Injuries are to blame, We have a small squad which doesnt help and im very confident that Souness will get the right players in over the next 12 months. Sacking will mean we have to let the new manager get his own team etc etc, We dont have the money for that, Let Souness do his job


Are you Souness in disguise?

Injuries my arse - every team in the land has injuries. Why do you think we get injuries? Maybe someone has cursed the training ground? Its because him and his 'coaches' dont have a clue what they are doing.

Toonarmy1810 - Well said

:D


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:24:39 PM
Mick so your blaming Souness for Bowyer and Dyer fighting?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 08:25:06 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:20:40 PM
Howay i have to disagree, Souness job was safe when we were in the Quaters of the Uefa Cup and Semi's of the Fa Cup, Injuries have been bad. I dont care what anyone says but Injuries are to blame, We have a small squad which doesnt help and im very confident that Souness will get the right players in over the next 12 months. Sacking will mean we have to let the new manager get his own team etc etc, We dont have the money for that, Let Souness do his job


it was only winning a few cup games that kept him in it. With hindsight, although not to some of us, if it had been up to me I would have kicked him out last September, if he hadn't won those cup ties he would be gone now so winning those few cup games worked out for the worse as we would have someone else here now





Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 08:28:42 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:24:39 PM
Mick so your blaming Souness for Bowyer and Dyer fighting?


Not directly, he doesn't set a very good example himself though does he?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:29:39 PM
Why doesnt he? So you think he wanted Bowyer and Dyer to fight?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Number 9 on October 02, 2005, 08:30:18 PM
Grabbing Bellamy round the next - not setting a good example if you ask me.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:32:13 PM
Theres no proof of Souness gripping Bellamy, Its funny how people call Souness a liar etc etc, Yet they believe everything Bellamy says, Was'nt it Bellamy that faked an injury? Basically Bellamy lied.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 08:33:44 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:24:39 PM
Mick so your blaming Souness for Bowyer and Dyer fighting?


I think there may an element of a dressing room being infiltrated and encouraged to show a confrontational attitude in there.

That certainly wouldn't have happened in a dressing room with a good spirit where the manager spreads good companionship and togetherness, concentrating on the football. It would be interesting to see what a psychologist thought of it.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 08:37:37 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:32:13 PM
Theres no proof of Souness gripping Bellamy, Its funny how people call Souness a liar etc etc, Yet they believe everything Bellamy says, Was'nt it Bellamy that faked an injury? Basically Bellamy lied.


this has done the death, Basically, its true. Bellamy wanted to speak to Shepherd about his unhappiness and found that, because he was unhappy and unable to focus on training. So he went to see Shepherd.

To me, it means the manager is unapproachable. Unacceptable. But not surprising, as it was all part of Souness strategy to make Bellamy unpopular and give him a reason to get rid of him. Bellamy did play right into his hands though, but that doesn't make him a liar.

However, the stories of Souness trying to break Dwight Yorkes leg, his own player, at Blackburn, are also true. Nice man eh ? Good manager as well eh ?



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:38:02 PM
Bowyer is a known thug, Its funny how people hate Souness so much they will make up theory of whats happening behind the scenes just so they can sleep at night, I can imagine you now lying in bed with your eyes wide open saying "It has to be Souness fault, It has to be Souness fault", Personally i think its Childish, Why would a manager want to come here when a lot of you are moaning buggers, Who never let a manager get on with his job!!!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:41:14 PM
NE5 your very funny, Do you still believe in the tooth fairy? Your very closed minded, You believe every bad thing thats wrote about Souness and when something nice is wrote you dont believe a word of it, Why would Souness want to break Yorke's leg? Your very gullible


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 08:42:29 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:32:13 PM
Theres no proof of Souness gripping Bellamy, Its funny how people call Souness a liar etc etc, Yet they believe everything Bellamy says, Was'nt it Bellamy that faked an injury? Basically Bellamy lied.


https://www.sport.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml;?xml=/sport/2004/10/21/sfnnew21.xml&sSheet=/sport/2004/10/21/ixfooty.html


The Newcastle manager, Graeme Souness, last night sought to deflect attention away from his well-publicised skirmish with Craig Bellamy which has over-shadowed and undermined his preparations for tonight's UEFA Cup tie with Panionios here.


Souness has decided not to answer questions about his training ground fracas with Bellamy which resulted in the Scotsman grabbing the forward by the throat after he had verbally abused his manager for the second time in three days on Tuesday.

"I am not here to talk about what happened yesterday, I am here to talk about what should be a very interesting and, judging by the pitch, a difficult game, so don't waste your breath asking me about it," said Souness.

It has, though, become apparent that Bellamy, who swore at Souness when being substituted at Charlton last Sunday, has been severely admonished by his manager, who had earlier warned that such misconduct would not be tolerated in the future.

"Bellamy was told in no uncertain terms that he had stepped out of line," a club source said. "It was the mother of all rollickings."



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 08:44:20 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:38:02 PM
Bowyer is a known thug, Its funny how people hate Souness so much they will make up theory of whats happening behind the scenes just so they can sleep at night, I can imagine you now lying in bed with your eyes wide open saying "It has to be Souness fault, It has to be Souness fault", Personally i think its Childish, Why would a manager want to come here when a lot of you are moaning buggers, Who never let a manager get on with his job!!!


Who was that aimed at?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:46:46 PM
Yea he got a bollocking, Just cuz Souness didnt wanna talk about a stupid Rumour didnt make it real, If a journalist asked Souness if he is having an affair with Britney Spears and he says "I dont wanna talk about this",then does that make it real? No its just Souness not getting dragged into the media lies who are out to sell papers.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 08:49:56 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:46:46 PM
Yea he got a bollocking, Just cuz Souness didnt wanna talk about a stupid Rumour didnt make it real, If a journalist asked Souness if he is having an affair with Britney Spears and he says "I dont wanna talk about this",then does that make it real? No its just Souness not getting dragged into the media lies who are out to sell papers.


Are you really that gullible?  Brittney Spears is married and just had a kid, why whould she have an affair with Souness?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 08:51:45 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:41:14 PM
NE5 your very funny, Do you still believe in the tooth fairy? Your very closed minded, You believe every bad thing thats wrote about Souness and when something nice is wrote you dont believe a word of it, Why would Souness want to break Yorke's leg? Your very gullible


First hand information from a Blackburn player matey. Because Souness had subbed him, which resulted in a row.

How many times have you seen Newcastle play? And whats a "quarterback" ? Now, thats what I call funny ....



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Cobh Ramblers on October 02, 2005, 08:56:07 PM
Did SBR not more or less confirm that he had been told by one of his former squad that Bellamy had been assaulted by Souness?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:58:56 PM
Quater back is what they described it on T.v because he gets the ball deep and sprays it wide to players, A bit like a quaterback does, If you have ever watched American football you'd know that the Quaterback get the ball and picks out a player. So your saying Souness wanted to risk his job and the risk of a court case because he had a little spat with Yorke? Why not put him in the reserves? Put him in the reserves then sell him? Break his leg and his value goes down and he's on the side lines for months picking up wages, Come on NE5 a little bit of Comman sense wouldnt hurt you


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 09:01:46 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:58:56 PM
Quater back is what they described it on T.v because he gets the ball deep and sprays it wide to players, A bit like a quaterback does, If you have ever watched American football you'd know that the Quaterback get the ball and picks out a player. So your saying Souness wanted to risk his job and the risk of a court case because he had a little spat with Yorke? Why not put him in the reserves? Put him in the reserves then sell him? Break his leg and his value goes down and he's on the side lines for months picking up wages, Come on NE5 a little bit of Comman sense wouldnt hurt you


wouldn't watch the shite if you paid me


And - read the post. I'm not telling you anything, I'm telling you what a Blackburn player said, which confirmed a report that was in the press.




Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 09:01:49 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 08:58:56 PM
Quater back is what they described it on T.v because he gets the ball deep and sprays it wide to players, A bit like a quaterback does, If you have ever watched American football you'd know that the Quaterback get the ball and picks out a player. So your saying Souness wanted to risk his job and the risk of a court case because he had a little spat with Yorke? Why not put him in the reserves? Put him in the reserves then sell him? Break his leg and his value goes down and he's on the side lines for months picking up wages, Come on NE5 a little bit of Comman sense wouldnt hurt you


Telling the world that your players are trouble and lazy also devalues them, it didn't stop Souness did it?

Souness was even stupid enough to say Shola was a better goal scorer than Bellamy, how daft is that?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 02, 2005, 09:05:04 PM
That Villa game - but for a disgusting decision by Mike Riley, as per, we'd probably have won that game, or at least got something out of it.

Didn't see us looking too close to getting anything 3-0 at home.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 09:07:21 PM
https://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/b/blackburn_rovers/3518648.stm

fao of the yank expert, as it obviously didn't appear in USA Today


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 09:12:02 PM
Quote from: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 09:07:21 PM
https://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/b/blackburn_rovers/3518648.stm

fao of the yank expert, as it obviously didn't appear in USA Today


I think you'll need photographic evidence before he'll believe you; it'll be lies from the BBC.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 02, 2005, 09:14:32 PM
It was Robson, as I recall, who publicised the story of the 'throat grabbing' incident. I don't believe for one single second that if SBR had made this accusation falsely that the club would not have jumped all over it and had him for it. As it was, there wasn't even a denial.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:24:02 PM
Im Welsh not American, And it doesnt say Souness tried to break Yorke's leg, Its chinese whisper with a lot of people in here. SBR is very bitter about his sacking and could of easily make up a story.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 02, 2005, 09:25:29 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:24:02 PM
Im Welsh not American, And it doesnt say Souness tried to break Yorke's leg, Its chinese whisper with a lot of people in here. SBR is very bitter about his sacking and could of easily make up a story.


And have the club not so much as deny it?

Howay man.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:26:48 PM
Maybe they dont wanna get dragged into a media war with SBR saying one thing and Newcastle the other, How does SBR know? Was he there?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 02, 2005, 09:28:41 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:26:48 PM
Maybe they dont wanna get dragged into a media war with SBR saying one thing and Newcastle the other, How does SBR know? Was he there?


I think he knows one or two of the people at the club. Might be wrong, like.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: thedudeabides on October 02, 2005, 09:30:02 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:26:48 PM
Maybe they dont wanna get dragged into a media war with SBR saying one thing and Newcastle the other, How does SBR know? Was he there?


No but John Carver was and he's told me that the incident happened. I presume he may have spoken to SBR about it too.

Next.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:30:25 PM
Yea Bellamy probably told him


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 09:31:37 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:24:02 PM
Im Welsh not American, And it doesnt say Souness tried to break Yorke's leg, Its chinese whisper with a lot of people in here. SBR is very bitter about his sacking and could of easily make up a story.


well, I obviously can't say the name of the player in question like, but it's true, whether you believe it or not !



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: thedudeabides on October 02, 2005, 09:34:22 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:30:25 PM
Yea Bellamy probably told him



Carver was a coach at the time and watched it happen, you clueless knacker.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:36:28 PM
I find it funny how some-body always know some-one who knows a player or coach, Its like my friends friend. The only reliable source of info on this board so far has been Lovejoy, No offence NE5 but i dont believe a word you say


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 09:37:12 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:26:48 PM
Maybe they dont wanna get dragged into a media war with SBR saying one thing and Newcastle the other, How does SBR know? Was he there?


The club have taken every opportunity they could to have a go at Sir Bob, why would they pass up a chance?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:38:18 PM
Was'nt Carver a youth coach or something when that happend? When was this Bellamy thing meant to of happend? I cant imagine Bellamy gettin gripped by the throat and not fighting back


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 09:38:26 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:36:28 PM
I find it funny how some-body always know some-one who knows a player or coach, Its like my friends friend. The only reliable source of info on this board so far has been Lovejoy, No offence NE5 but i dont believe a word you say


No you prefer to believe every bit of propaganda Souness or the club puts out.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:42:32 PM
Not at all Mick, Im just open minded, If i get solid evidence that Souness gripped Bellamy then i will believe it, Until then i'm just looking at it as a possiblity, When someone who hates Souness and will do anything to have his name tarnished saying stuff about him with no evidence then him not gonna believe it.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 09:42:57 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 09:37:12 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:26:48 PM
Maybe they dont wanna get dragged into a media war with SBR saying one thing and Newcastle the other, How does SBR know? Was he there?


The club have taken every opportunity they could to have a go at Sir Bob, why would they pass up a chance?


It happened in training, last October.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 09:43:41 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:42:32 PM
Not at all Mick, Im just open minded, If i get solid evidence that Souness gripped Bellamy then i will believe it, Until then i'm just looking at it as a possiblity, When someone who hates Souness and will do anything to have his name tarnished saying stuff about him with no evidence then him not gonna believe it.


OK then. You support Souness, right ? Do you believe the "evidence" of results last season, and so far this season ?



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:47:31 PM
Im still undecided if Souness is the right man, He is sorting out the dressing room but his tactics are questionable, I would like to see what he's is like when most Injuries are back, Im happy with the press we are getting later or i should say lack of Press. The end of the day i support Newcastle and i always will, We get a good result and some how we were lucky, We get a bad result and its all Souness fault, TBH its really starting to get on my nerves


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 09:48:43 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:42:32 PM
Not at all Mick, Im just open minded, If i get solid evidence that Souness gripped Bellamy then i will believe it, Until then i'm just looking at it as a possiblity, When someone who hates Souness and will do anything to have his name tarnished saying stuff about him with no evidence then him not gonna believe it.


Open minded, I don't think so.

You do not believe anything that goes against Souness, that's not open minded it's being bloody minded.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:52:31 PM
No Mick i'm not gonna believe people on here that hate Souness with Passion, Ofcourse you gonna try a slate him cuz you hate him, I've taken all that into account and until i get some proof im gonna put it in the maybe pile, Im not Gullible and aint gonna believe everything people say on here


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 09:56:26 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:52:31 PM
No Mick i'm not gonna believe people on here that hate Souness with Passion, Ofcourse you gonna try a slate him cuz you hate him, I've taken all that into account and until i get some proof im gonna put it in the maybe pile, Im not Gullible and aint gonna believe everything people say on here


I don't hate Souness at all, I just don't want him as our manager, and he’s not up to it.  I'll only try to slate him when he deserves it, I don't make things up about him.  Everything I have said is well documented apart from when I've expressed an opinion, I base my opinion on what I see read and hear.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: thedudeabides on October 02, 2005, 09:57:04 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:47:31 PM
Im still undecided if Souness is the right man, He is sorting out the dressing room but his tactics are questionable, I would like to see what he's is like when most Injuries are back, Im happy with the press we are getting later or i should say lack of Press. The end of the day i support Newcastle and i always will, We get a good result and some how we were lucky, We get a bad result and its all Souness fault, TBH its really starting to get on my nerves


Funny that, as watching utter dross and then having to listen the Clueless Jock's excuses has been getting on my nerves for some time now. About a year actually.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 10:01:35 PM
Mick you hate Souness, Its blatenly obvious, Thats fair enough that you dont want Souness as our Manager but you should blame him for every  problem that Newcastle have, Like Injuries, He couldnt stop Owen from running into Taylor and the Bowyer v Dyer crap, Souness didnt tell them to fight, The problem on this Board people are far to quick to blame Souness, IMO the players should take some of the flak aswell


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: HTT on October 02, 2005, 10:05:32 PM
For Souness' supposed throat grabbing I'll raise ya; Bellamy's chair throwing at Carver?

Where does it end?

Anyway, for what it's worth, I'm over the whole Bellamy thing now - he's gone and won't ever return. If we weren't talking about this, we'd be talking about how we are sick of him always being out injured. Long-term I think we'll save ourselves a lot of heartache over this player because we all know, he'll retire from the game at an early age and he'll always miss upwards of 20 games a season or more in one shape or another.

He should never have went on TV, he should never have spat the dummy out in the first place. He should have acted with some intelligence and stuck it out, played for the team and not himself, put his own interests second and he'd still be here and who knows, maybe we would have had a better finish to last season than we did.

Anyway it's all by the by now, he's gone and for good. This will be my last ever post on the whole subject, I'm bored of it now.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:11:29 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 10:01:35 PM
Mick you hate Souness, Its blatenly obvious, Thats fair enough that you dont want Souness as our Manager but you should blame him for every  problem that Newcastle have, Like Injuries, He couldnt stop Owen from running into Taylor and the Bowyer v Dyer crap, Souness didnt tell them to fight, The problem on this Board people are far to quick to blame Souness, IMO the players should take some of the flak aswell


I've said I don't hate Souness, if I hated him I'd say I did.  I don’t have a problem admitting my feelings, I would think I know how I feel better than your analysis.

I don't blame anybody for Owen clashing with Taylor it was an accident, accidents happen.  Just because that one wasn't his fault doesn't get away from the fact that Dyer and Emre were brought back too soon after injury, as least one admitted he was under pressure to play.

As far as this board goes, I think it's a reasonable reflection of general opinion, possibly more pro Souness than reality.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 10:13:43 PM
Good post Howay, I agree about the Bellamy bit, Personally i dont know if the throwing the chair bit was 100% true but i remember reading something that SBR said a few days after when asked about and he said something along the lines of "There was an incident and we are dealing with it", Im not saying the Souness gripping Bellamy by the throat is false im just saying i having had read or seen credible evidence


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 10:17:49 PM
Dyer and Emre will be inder pressure to player, They are now. Dyer is under more pressure cuz he knows his Career is hanging in the balance and Emre wants to hurry up and get fit cuz he wants to prove to us Newcastle fans that he is a good player. Luque will be the same. When we are down to our bare bones there will always be pressure on players to play


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 03, 2005, 12:49:37 AM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 10:13:43 PM
Good post Howay, I agree about the Bellamy bit, Personally i dont know if the throwing the chair bit was 100% true but i remember reading something that SBR said a few days after when asked about and he said something along the lines of "There was an incident and we are dealing with it", Im not saying the Souness gripping Bellamy by the throat is false im just saying i having had read or seen credible evidence


I told you what was true, and that is the POINTS we gained last season and so far this season, yet you continue to ignore it.

Clueless.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Number 9 on October 03, 2005, 06:04:58 PM
Quote from: NE5 on October 02, 2005, 09:43:41 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:42:32 PM
Not at all Mick, Im just open minded, If i get solid evidence that Souness gripped Bellamy then i will believe it, Until then i'm just looking at it as a possiblity, When someone who hates Souness and will do anything to have his name tarnished saying stuff about him with no evidence then him not gonna believe it.




OK then. You support Souness, right ? Do you believe the "evidence" of results last season, and so far this season ?




Reffer to Jackie Broon's avatar for his answer on that question.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: lovejoy on October 03, 2005, 06:14:50 PM
Quote from: thedudeabides on October 02, 2005, 09:34:22 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 02, 2005, 09:30:25 PM
Yea Bellamy probably told him



Carver was a coach at the time and watched it happen, you clueless knacker.



souey blatantly did grab bellas by the throat, the club would have sued the arse off bobby if he hadnt.

it is worth noting that carver (at a talk in) confired that disciplne under bobby was non existant.

so im not sure sir bobby was the best person to comment, given the players ran riot under him


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 06:34:42 PM
I dont know whats true and what isnt but it seems like the rumours of Souness falling out with players or doing his best to drive them out of the club have followed him his whole career, like i say i dont know the whole truth about these sitautions but i do know that alot of the time theres no smoke without fire and there seems to be alot of smoke emminating from Souness.

But lets be fair, like i say these rumours could all just be pie in the sky. So heres some proper reasons for Souness to be sacked:

Finished 14th in the premiership last season, unacceptable for a club of Newcastle Uniteds size and potential. Despite spending somewhere in the region of £45 million on new players of his choice during the close season we've started this season looking worse than what we did last season. If FFS can justify sacking a manager of Sir Bobbys pedigree so early into the season last year why cant he give Souness, a man whos managerial pedigree can be upstaged by a tin of pedigree chum the boot aswell.

Maybe rumours of discontent at the club arent a good enough reason to sack him but surely his managerial stats while in charge of Newcastle are.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 03, 2005, 06:56:22 PM
There's little doubt in my mind that Souness is strong on discipline and that is important for the wellbeing of any club.

There's no doubt whatsoever that the signings of Owen, Luque and Parker are all excellent, not very good, excellent.  With the exception of Chelsea, they would improve any squad in the land.  But being a strong disciplinarian and having the ability to identify good players does not make Souness a good manager.

While those two qualities are important, where are his motivational skills, his tactical skills?  These are lacking and are far more important than Souness's first two  qualities.  I want to see a manager with the ability to get the best out the players who are fit and available to him, to have them playing in a style the players understand and are comfortable with.  I want the manager to identify the faults that the players may have in their game and then coach them out of them.  That may take time but Souness has had enough to have started having an impact, so that the supporter can see what he's trying to achieve.

Souness has some of the qualities needed but not the ones that are most important.  Where were the goals coming from before Owen was signed?  Where would the goals come from if Owen (heaven forbid) picked up a long term injury?  I don't know and I suspect that Souness doesn't know either.  That's why I think it's time for him to go.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:02:46 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 03, 2005, 06:56:22 PM
There's little doubt in my mind that Souness is strong on discipline and that is important for the wellbeing of any club.

There's no doubt whatsoever that the signings of Owen, Luque and Parker are all excellent, not very good, excellent.  With the exception of Chelsea, they would improve any squad in the land.  But being a strong disciplinarian and having the ability to identify good players does not make Souness a good manager.

While those two qualities are important, where are his motivational skills, his tactical skills?  These are lacking and are far more important than Souness's first two  qualities.  I want to see a manager with the ability to get the best out the players who are fit and available to him, to have them playing in a style the players understand and are comfortable with.  I want the manager to identify the faults that the players may have in their game and then coach them out of them.  That may take time but Souness has had enough to have started having an impact, so that the supporter can see what he's trying to achieve.

Souness has some of the qualities needed but not the ones that are most important.  Where were the goals coming from before Owen was signed?  Where would the goals come from if Owen (heaven forbid) picked up a long term injury?  I don't know and I suspect that Souness doesn't know either.  That's why I think it's time for him to go.



I'm now waiting for somebody to pull your post to bits, it's spot on.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:07:58 PM
Jol i actually agree with most of what you say, But IMO Souness is done a bit more than just a few good buys and his discipline, Bramble and Dyer (When Fit) have progessed under Souness, I used to hate Bramble, Call him every name under the sun but now i feel Bramble is a key player. I feel when we were under SBR the club was rotting from the inside out, Souness has come in and IMHO the club's bad press has stopped and the dressing room seems to be a lot happier, Our injuries were bad under SBR and its still bad now. I feel that Souness has his good points and bad points but he deserves a fair shot, When he has a few players back hopefully in 2 weeks then he should be judged.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:12:46 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 03, 2005, 06:56:22 PM
There's little doubt in my mind that Souness is strong on discipline and that is important for the wellbeing of any club.

There's no doubt whatsoever that the signings of Owen, Luque and Parker are all excellent, not very good, excellent.  With the exception of Chelsea, they would improve any squad in the land.  But being a strong disciplinarian and having the ability to identify good players does not make Souness a good manager.

While those two qualities are important, where are his motivational skills, his tactical skills?  These are lacking and are far more important than Souness's first two  qualities.  I want to see a manager with the ability to get the best out the players who are fit and available to him, to have them playing in a style the players understand and are comfortable with.  I want the manager to identify the faults that the players may have in their game and then coach them out of them.  That may take time but Souness has had enough to have started having an impact, so that the supporter can see what he's trying to achieve.

Souness has some of the qualities needed but not the ones that are most important.  Where were the goals coming from before Owen was signed?  Where would the goals come from if Owen (heaven forbid) picked up a long term injury?  I don't know and I suspect that Souness doesn't know either.  That's why I think it's time for him to go.



I couldnt have put it better myself mate. I think when Shephard employed him he was looking for an Alex Ferguson type of manager. A good tactically minded manager who is respected by his players and wouldnt take any shit. Unfortunately the only one of those 3 qualities which Souness possesses is that he wont take any shit and he even goes overboard with that.
To be honest i think one of the main reasons Souness still has a job is because FFS wont admitt he made the wrong choice in appointing him.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Number 9 on October 03, 2005, 07:13:18 PM
If the club was rotting under SBR whats happening now?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:16:00 PM
Souness has the respect of the players, How can Souness expect to be tactical when he has only had a small group of players? When we have more players fit then he can change things around, If it proves he still cant get it right then he has to go


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: lovejoy on October 03, 2005, 07:17:31 PM
jol, you have probably made me realise what i hadnt realised before.

souness has done very very well indeed to bring in some of th epeople he has done, he has also made us a healthier club than what we were off the pitch (notice we are never referred to as the brat pack in the press etc. which is a bonus), and i have allowed these qualities to cloud my vision of his managerial skills and ability to take the club forward.

soueys tactical and motivational abilities do have massive question marks over them however, and this will hinder our progress massively.

when do we sack him though?? now?? what for exactly? as much as its boring to hear, he hasnt had a chance to field anything like his best side, do we sack him in a few weeks?? what happens if we win the next 5 games and we are sitting in the top six in november??

what then???



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Number 9 on October 03, 2005, 07:19:34 PM
Sack him then because you can bet your bottom dollar that he will somehow manage to **** it up.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:19:52 PM
There was unrest in the dressing room, Players were running riot. Bad press most weeks.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:22:40 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:19:52 PM
There was unrest in the dressing room, Players were running riot. Bad press most weeks.


Ok dragon, time to own up. We know its you Graeme!!! bluebigrazz.gif


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:26:24 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:19:52 PM
There was unrest in the dressing room, Players were running riot. Bad press most weeks.


Players were almost rioting on the pitch under Souness, those players are still here and are referred to as "proper players."


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:28:58 PM
Mick all that was down to 1 players, Bowyer who shouldnt be at Newcastle, Souness cant be blamed for that


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 03, 2005, 07:31:42 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:16:00 PM
Souness has the respect of the players, How can Souness expect to be tactical when he has only had a small group of players? When we have more players fit then he can change things around, If it proves he still cant get it right then he has to go


hoo... Taffy....if you say you only take notice of "evidence" what about the "evidence" of points total and league position



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 03, 2005, 07:33:08 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:26:24 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:19:52 PM
There was unrest in the dressing room, Players were running riot. Bad press most weeks.


Players were almost rioting on the pitch under Souness, those players are still here and are referred to as "proper players."


aye. More "evidence"...

oops sorry, it didn't happen it was all camera tricks ....



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 03, 2005, 07:36:26 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


and a stupid manager has assaulted 2 of his players - that we know of - and neither was his fault.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:37:55 PM
You want my opinion? I think we are all just living in a dream which Souness is having just now because only in his dreams could he ever get the Newcastle job and only in his dreams could he be doing so badly at it and still have the job. Someone please pinch him so we can all return to the real world and if we all so happen to disapear when he wakes up, so be it. VBecause not existing has got to be far better than living in his warped and weird imagination.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:38:31 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:28:58 PM
Mick all that was down to 1 players, Bowyer who shouldnt be at Newcastle, Souness cant be blamed for that


I'll give you a quote from Souness after the fight:

"I can envisage both of them playing for Newcastle again. Players like them do not come along every day and they are class players."



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:39:45 PM
Mick read my post again!!! I didnt say Souness dont want Bowyer, Its my Opinion he should be sold


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


You mentioned "riot", that's the closest I've seen to a riot.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:41:47 PM
Obviously Mick you've never seen a Riot before


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


You mentioned "riot", that's the closest I've seen to a riot.


We should have seen it coming, The Kaiser Chiefs did.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:42:48 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:39:45 PM
Mick read my post again!!! I didnt say Souness dont want Bowyer, Its my Opinion he should be sold


Sorry if I misread it, I picked out "Bowyer who shouldnt be at Newcastle, Souness cant be blamed for that."


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Shak on October 03, 2005, 07:44:18 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


You mentioned "riot", that's the closest I've seen to a riot.


We should have seen it coming, The Kaiser Chiefs did.


Yeah and they're sh*te too.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:44:38 PM
Souness doesnt deal with the transfers that FS, If we couldnt find a buyer thats not Souness fault, Brummies would of had him but the Fans didnt want him


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 08:02:50 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 03, 2005, 07:44:18 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


Lol. I totally agree mate.

You mentioned "riot", that's the closest I've seen to a riot.


We should have seen it coming, The Kaiser Chiefs did.


Yeah and they're sh*te too.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 08:03:58 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 08:02:50 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 03, 2005, 07:44:18 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


Lol. I totally agree mate.

You mentioned "riot", that's the closest I've seen to a riot.


We should have seen it coming, The Kaiser Chiefs did.


Yeah and they're sh*te too.



lol. I totally agree mate.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Shak on October 03, 2005, 08:05:00 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 08:03:58 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 08:02:50 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 03, 2005, 07:44:18 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


Lol. I totally agree mate.

You mentioned "riot", that's the closest I've seen to a riot.


We should have seen it coming, The Kaiser Chiefs did.


Yeah and they're sh*te too.



lol. I totally agree mate.


Well everyone always does!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 03, 2005, 08:32:05 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 03, 2005, 08:05:00 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 08:03:58 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 08:02:50 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 03, 2005, 07:44:18 PM
Quote from: yardii_boy on October 03, 2005, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 03, 2005, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:34:51 PM
So 1 stupid player attacked another player and suddenly the players are rioting on the pitch?


Lol. I totally agree mate.

You mentioned "riot", that's the closest I've seen to a riot.


We should have seen it coming, The Kaiser Chiefs did.


Yeah and they're sh*te too.



lol. I totally agree mate.


Well everyone always does!


They don't


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 01:21:15 AM
Quote from: lovejoy on October 03, 2005, 07:17:31 PM
jol, you have probably made me realise what i hadnt realised before.

souness has done very very well indeed to bring in some of th epeople he has done, he has also made us a healthier club than what we were off the pitch (notice we are never referred to as the brat pack in the press etc. which is a bonus), and i have allowed these qualities to cloud my vision of his managerial skills and ability to take the club forward.

soueys tactical and motivational abilities do have massive question marks over them however, and this will hinder our progress massively.

when do we sack him though?? now?? what for exactly? as much as its boring to hear, he hasnt had a chance to field anything like his best side, do we sack him in a few weeks?? what happens if we win the next 5 games and we are sitting in the top six in november??


what then???


I agree that he hasn't had an opportunity to field his best side, or anything like it, but you're not devoid of decent players.  With the players available, you still had enough ability to beat Portsmouth, yet you were lucky to out of it with a draw and but for one wonderful display from Given, you probably would have lost at least 3-0.  The midfielders still available to you should still have ensured the back 4 were well protected.  The fact that they weren't is, in my mind, a failure in the tactics.

You ask when he should be sacked, assuming of course he is.  The next 5 premiership games (you'll beat Grimsby, no-one could play as bad as Spurs again!) ought to be games where you should get a minimum of 10 pts, but I reckon you'll get only 5 :

Wigan(A) - doing a lot better than most people expected - L
Mackems(H) - Doing better but still relegation fodder - W
WBA(A) - Needing to scrap for points - D
Brum(H) - Difficult to break down, unlucky against the scum - D
Chelsea(A) - Nuff said - (L)

If I was right (not saying I will be mind), you'd be getting near to December with 14 pts from 13 games, which is relegation form.  That would be the time, if I was Fat Fred, to would say enough is enough.  What's more, most of the December matches don't look to be in the 'easy win' category either.

The away match at Blackburn I think was a 'must win' game for Souness, but I think he will be looking at similar game(s) this month as well.  Excluding Fergie, Souness is the least qualified manager in the premiership, even less qulaified than some of his players, and in my opinion, it shows.




Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


Jesus wept.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 08:10:02 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


Jesus wept.


To me, and i think alot of others, KEEPING the current manager is a massive disaster.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 08:36:31 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 08:10:02 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


Jesus wept.


To me, and i think alot of others, KEEPING the current manager is a massive disaster.


Agree totally mate.  Souness found his level when he was with Blackburn.  There must a better manager out there somewhere who wants to manage a big club in the premiership.  The longer Fat Fred waits, the more likelihood that the prospect of Europe will become just a dream.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 04, 2005, 08:40:36 AM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 08:36:31 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 08:10:02 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


Jesus wept.


To me, and i think alot of others, KEEPING the current manager is a massive disaster.


Agree totally mate.  Souness found his level when he was with Blackburn.  There must a better manager out there somewhere who wants to manage a big club in the premiership.  The longer Fat Fred waits, the more likelihood that the prospect of Europe will become just a dream.


MJ..keep the good posts coming mate, shame some fans of our own club can't see the reality of our situation as clearly as you that supports another club.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 09:10:41 AM
I have it on good authority that Martin Jol's real name is in fact Mick McCarthy!  :tongue3:


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 09:25:51 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 09:10:41 AM
I have it on good authority that Martin Jol's real name is in fact Mick McCarthy!  :tongue3:


Hurts me almost as much as you when things aren't right at SJP.  Can't say the same about McCarthy!  He's a better manager than Souness mind. :wink:


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 09:42:23 AM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 08:36:31 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 08:10:02 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


Jesus wept.


To me, and i think alot of others, KEEPING the current manager is a massive disaster.


Agree totally mate.  Souness found his level when he was with Blackburn.  There must a better manager out there somewhere who wants to manage a big club in the premiership.  The longer Fat Fred waits, the more likelihood that the prospect of Europe will become just a dream.


Those people who say "you can't get rid now, yadda yadda", i think are mentals. I can't think why ANY manager coming into the club wouldn't be happy to have the likes of Given, Parker, Emre, Solano and Owen, and players like Taylor and The Zog coming through. And i can't see why most decent managers wouldn't make a damned better fist of it than Souness is, purely because his tactical and man-management skills are so dreadful.

We won't go down, but the best we're going to get under Souness is making mid table our own. I only pray to God that he doesn't get any more money to spend, cos a proper manager, when we finally get one, will be needing that to fix Souness' mistakes.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 09:54:03 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 09:42:23 AM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 08:36:31 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 08:10:02 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


Jesus wept.


To me, and i think alot of others, KEEPING the current manager is a massive disaster.


Agree totally mate.  Souness found his level when he was with Blackburn.  There must a better manager out there somewhere who wants to manage a big club in the premiership.  The longer Fat Fred waits, the more likelihood that the prospect of Europe will become just a dream.


Those people who say "you can't get rid now, yadda yadda", i think are mentals. I can't think why ANY manager coming into the club wouldn't be happy to have the likes of Given, Parker, Emre, Solano and Owen, and players like Taylor and The Zog coming through. And i can't see why most decent managers wouldn't make a damned better fist of it than Souness is, purely because his tactical and man-management skills are so dreadful.

We won't go down, but the best we're going to get under Souness is making mid table our own. I only pray to God that he doesn't get any more money to spend, cos a proper manager, when we finally get one, will be needing that to fix Souness' mistakes.



Don't honestly think there's a cat in hell's chance of that, the squad is simply far too good.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kyzer Sosay on October 04, 2005, 10:36:15 AM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 03, 2005, 07:44:38 PM
Souness doesnt deal with the transfers that FS, If we couldnt find a buyer thats not Souness fault, Brummies would of had him but the Fans didnt want him


and yet you  congratulate him on the Owen, Luque, Emre, Parker, Solano signings?

I've read all this thread and there are some really good posts, Guinness and MJol in particular, but there has been a lot of shite as well.

a lot of it coming from Dragon5555444545454 or whatever his bloody name is.

Graema Souness is a bad manager. <---- see that? it's a full stop that means it's the end of the debate. He's a bad football manager because he's tactically naive, he's incapable of assuming blame for the defeats, it's forvever the fault of the referee, the linesman etc.

He is to blame for Dyer and Bowyer's spat, as someone else mentioned if the dressing room was chipper you wouldn't have a fight with your team-mate now would you? but what's that you say, Souness got rid of the troublesome players?

It's true that the team we watch now is stronger than that which Robson left us, but again I'd argue that those excellent transfers are more the responsibility of Shepherd and dare I say Shearer.

We've got to keep Souness until Christmas because to sack him now would be of little use. We won't necessarily improve the morale of the side, we won't necessarily improve the form on the pitch and it certainly won't improve public opinion of the club.

He's gobby, he's inept, but he's all we've got at the moment.

I'll never sing his name, and I'll never respect his managerial career, but I cannot see benefit in his dismissal at the moment.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 04, 2005, 10:44:25 AM
Again it's no real coup for Souness to have a stronger side than the one Robson left us. It's not like he's picked up a Vieira from Milan's reserves. I'm not saying Robson wasn't backed, he was, but he was certainly never given £50m to spend in one year. Give me £50m, I'll sign a few canny players. It's not who you sign, it's what you get out of them.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 10:46:50 AM
My fear, though is that if he lasts till Christmas, and beyond, and we drag ourselves into the top 10, he'll blame injuries, Shepherd may buy it, and he'll get another year.

By the end of that, we have to start again, cos Nobby will be too old, Owen won't have hung around, etc etc.......

I'm scared, i really am.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 04, 2005, 10:48:22 AM
Giving him a chance is not an option in my opinion and never has been. So he'll go without a fair throw of the dice? So ****, we're not a charity case for any bugger to try his luck at.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kyzer Sosay on October 04, 2005, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Wullie on October 04, 2005, 10:48:22 AM
Giving him a chance is not an option in my opinion and never has been. So he'll go without a fair throw of the dice? So ****, we're not a charity case for any bugger to try his luck at.


until Christmas?

I'd give him til christmas, not because he could change things round, but because it'll give Shepherd time to orgainse his succesor and for once we could have a smooth transition.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 04, 2005, 10:58:04 AM
Quote from: Kyzer Sosay on October 04, 2005, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Wullie on October 04, 2005, 10:48:22 AM
Giving him a chance is not an option in my opinion and never has been. So he'll go without a fair throw of the dice? So ****, we're not a charity case for any bugger to try his luck at.


until Christmas?

I'd give him til christmas, not because he could change things round, but because it'll give Shepherd time to orgainse his succesor and for once we could have a smooth transition.


Aye well I wouldn't say I wouldn't do that, but I wouldn't 'give him a chance' for the sake of it, which is all we've heard in his defence from day one. Staggering to think this could have been so easily avoided last May as well.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kyzer Sosay on October 04, 2005, 11:00:45 AM
on the birght side, whoever comes in, inherits a wealth of talent in midfield and isn't lumbered with the task of replacing Shearer.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Slugsy on October 04, 2005, 11:04:05 AM
Quote from: Kyzer Sosay on October 04, 2005, 11:00:45 AM
on the birght side, whoever comes in, inherits a wealth of talent in midfield and isn't lumbered with the task of replacing Shearer.


Actually, I still think we have that problem, Bellamy has been replaced with a better player, but I think we still are looking for a replacement for Shearer.

Right now we only have one decent striker.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: lovejoy on October 04, 2005, 11:06:30 AM
we all know for a fact we will end up with o'dreary, bruce or shearer


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: womblemaster on October 04, 2005, 11:08:50 AM
"I'm scared, i really am"


your also paranoid and gay but hey hoy lonyy dong dong!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kyzer Sosay on October 04, 2005, 11:09:37 AM
Quote from: womblemaster on October 04, 2005, 11:08:50 AM
"I'm scared, i really am"


your also paranoid and gay but hey hoy lonyy dong dong!


that was constructive...

and funny...

and not at all a waste of time


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 04, 2005, 11:09:52 AM
Quote from: lovejoy on October 04, 2005, 11:06:30 AM
we all know for a fact we will end up with o'dreary, bruce or shearer


<sigh>

You're right, of course.

Its going to be Shearer, isn't it. Which means out goes Souness' mates like Saunders, and in comes Shearers mates like Rob Lee.

And the cult of personality continues - "the dressing room is better now Bellamy is gone" actually means "only Shearer didn't like Bellamy", and thats only going to continue.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: buzza on October 04, 2005, 11:25:25 AM
The only way we should get rid of Souness is if we are going to replace him with the calibre of manager that can take us a lot further. O leary, Bruce, Allardice...etc are two bob managers and are really not any better or worse than what we have.
I would certainly replace Souness at any point in the future but only if we were to bring in the calibre of the likes of: Hitzfield, Hiddink and....(can't think of anyone at moment).
I don't think it's relevant whether we replace him before or after christmas, the manager who comes in has a huge amount of talent at his disposal.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 04, 2005, 05:57:56 PM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


Jesus wept.


He did when Souness got the Newcastle job.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 06:06:56 PM
Quote from: buzza on October 04, 2005, 11:25:25 AM
The only way we should get rid of Souness is if we are going to replace him with the calibre of manager that can take us a lot further. O leary, Bruce, Allardice...etc are two bob managers and are really not any better or worse than what we have.
I would certainly replace Souness at any point in the future but only if we were to bring in the calibre of the likes of: Hitzfield, Hiddink and....(can't think of anyone at moment).
I don't think it's relevant whether we replace him before or after christmas, the manager who comes in has a huge amount of talent at his disposal.


I rate Allardyce as he has the ability to get more out of the players that he's got than he should.  He's working on a shoestring budget and could be a big success with a good squad and money at his disposal.  Having said that, I'd still prefer a foreign manager, Le Guen, Hiddink, Hitzfeld.  Would they turn down the opportunity to take on a big club in the premiership?  I honestly don't think so.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wiley on October 04, 2005, 06:09:14 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 04, 2005, 05:57:56 PM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 04, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 02, 2005, 10:08:57 AM
Why would getting a new manager at this stage be a disaster?


Jesus wept.


He did when Souness got the Newcastle job.


I dont want to finish 14th again this season thanks!  :tongue3:


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: The Fox on October 04, 2005, 07:16:17 PM
Amazing there are still people on here who say wait until Dyer is fit. He wont ever be fit.
As for Souness's record on buying. How can anyone say his buys have been great and then quote Luque - already injured and looked way off the pace when he did appear, Emre- injured,
Babayaro - defensively mediocre and another injury liability, Boumsong - Seem to remember him making plenty of mistakes recently, Faye - poor, Solano - yet to feature. Owen - excellent, Parker - good buy.
Its far too early to say he has made great purchases, and the whole point is how they perform together.
I cannot remember one outstanding performance by a Souness Newcastle side and I cannot believe he handed Dyer a new contract with his injury record.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 04, 2005, 07:22:24 PM
Quote from: The Fox on October 04, 2005, 07:16:17 PM
Amazing there are still people on here who say wait until Dyer is fit. He wont ever be fit.
As for Souness's record on buying. How can anyone say his buys have been great and then quote Luque - already injured and looked way off the pace when he did appear, Emre- injured,
Babayaro - defensively mediocre and another injury liability, Boumsong - Seem to remember him making plenty of mistakes recently, Faye - poor, Solano - yet to feature. Owen - excellent, Parker - good buy.
Its far too early to say he has made great purchases, and the whole point is how they perform together.
I cannot remember one outstanding performance by a Souness Newcastle side and I cannot believe he handed Dyer a new contract with his injury record.


The sad thing is that he's had 12 months of trying to get his team to perform at an acceptable level and we rarely have.

The other sad thing is that some of our fellow supporters are happy with the shambolic displays that are being served up as entertainment.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Alan Shearer 9 on October 04, 2005, 07:25:11 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 04, 2005, 07:22:24 PM
Quote from: The Fox on October 04, 2005, 07:16:17 PM
Amazing there are still people on here who say wait until Dyer is fit. He wont ever be fit.
As for Souness's record on buying. How can anyone say his buys have been great and then quote Luque - already injured and looked way off the pace when he did appear, Emre- injured,
Babayaro - defensively mediocre and another injury liability, Boumsong - Seem to remember him making plenty of mistakes recently, Faye - poor, Solano - yet to feature. Owen - excellent, Parker - good buy.
Its far too early to say he has made great purchases, and the whole point is how they perform together.
I cannot remember one outstanding performance by a Souness Newcastle side and I cannot believe he handed Dyer a new contract with his injury record.


The sad thing is that he's had 12 months of trying to get his team to perform at an acceptable level and we rarely have.

The other sad thing is that some of our fellow supporters are happy with the shambolic displays that are being served up as entertainment.


the one match we've been great in is Olympiakos at home was it? Can't remember but we battered them 4-0 and were outstanding. Other than that, **** all


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 04, 2005, 07:27:24 PM
Quote from: Alan Shearer 9 on October 04, 2005, 07:25:11 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 04, 2005, 07:22:24 PM
Quote from: The Fox on October 04, 2005, 07:16:17 PM
Amazing there are still people on here who say wait until Dyer is fit. He wont ever be fit.
As for Souness's record on buying. How can anyone say his buys have been great and then quote Luque - already injured and looked way off the pace when he did appear, Emre- injured,
Babayaro - defensively mediocre and another injury liability, Boumsong - Seem to remember him making plenty of mistakes recently, Faye - poor, Solano - yet to feature. Owen - excellent, Parker - good buy.
Its far too early to say he has made great purchases, and the whole point is how they perform together.
I cannot remember one outstanding performance by a Souness Newcastle side and I cannot believe he handed Dyer a new contract with his injury record.


The sad thing is that he's had 12 months of trying to get his team to perform at an acceptable level and we rarely have.

The other sad thing is that some of our fellow supporters are happy with the shambolic displays that are being served up as entertainment.


the one match we've been great in is Olympiakos at home was it? Can't remember but we battered them 4-0 and were outstanding. Other than that, **** all


Yes that was a really good game, much better than I expected.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 04, 2005, 09:37:30 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 04, 2005, 06:06:56 PM
Quote from: buzza on October 04, 2005, 11:25:25 AM
The only way we should get rid of Souness is if we are going to replace him with the calibre of manager that can take us a lot further. O leary, Bruce, Allardice...etc are two bob managers and are really not any better or worse than what we have.
I would certainly replace Souness at any point in the future but only if we were to bring in the calibre of the likes of: Hitzfield, Hiddink and....(can't think of anyone at moment).
I don't think it's relevant whether we replace him before or after christmas, the manager who comes in has a huge amount of talent at his disposal.


I rate Allardyce as he has the ability to get more out of the players that he's got than he should.  He's working on a shoestring budget and could be a big success with a good squad and money at his disposal.  Having said that, I'd still prefer a foreign manager, Le Guen, Hiddink, Hitzfeld.  Would they turn down the opportunity to take on a big club in the premiership?  I honestly don't think so.


Completely agree. They would see it as a golden opportunity.

Fact is, the managers who turned us down last year are pygmies, and it's better we found out then rather than later. Forget them.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Bad Mongo on October 05, 2005, 12:08:05 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 04, 2005, 07:27:24 PM
Quote from: Alan Shearer 9 on October 04, 2005, 07:25:11 PM
the one match we've been great in is Olympiakos at home was it? Can't remember but we battered them 4-0 and were outstanding. Other than that, **** all


Yes that was a really good game, much better than I expected.


Yes, but against opposition of much lower standard, who had already been properly demoralized from losing 3-1 and having two players sent off at home.

But to be fair, I thought we looked good against Arsenal before Jenas was sent off. Not excellent, but better than I've come to expect.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 05, 2005, 12:32:32 AM
Quote from: Bad Mongo on October 05, 2005, 12:08:05 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 04, 2005, 07:27:24 PM
Quote from: Alan Shearer 9 on October 04, 2005, 07:25:11 PM
the one match we've been great in is Olympiakos at home was it? Can't remember but we battered them 4-0 and were outstanding. Other than that, **** all


Yes that was a really good game, much better than I expected.


Yes, but against opposition of much lower standard, who had already been properly demoralized from losing 3-1 and having two players sent off at home.

But to be fair, I thought we looked good against Arsenal before Jenas was sent off. Not excellent, but better than I've come to expect.


Where are Olympiakos now ?

As for Arsenal, good try but if you think putting 9 men behind the ball and making it difficult for the opposition is "playing welll .........."

Shades of wembley 98 I think

Utter complete shite performance, on both occasions



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Baggio on October 05, 2005, 12:40:48 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 05, 2005, 12:32:32 AM
Where are Olympiakos now ?


Played Real Madrid last wednesday in the Champions League...


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 08:01:13 AM
Quote from: nufc1984 on October 04, 2005, 06:09:14 PM
I dont want to finish 14th again this season thanks!  :tongue3:


Yep, that's exactly why I don't want to see the club plunged back into yet another "transitional" phase.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 05, 2005, 08:24:51 AM
Quote from: Baggio on October 05, 2005, 12:40:48 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 05, 2005, 12:32:32 AM
Where are Olympiakos now ?


Played Real Madrid last wednesday in the Champions League...

yep........but I meant it the other way round......


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 08:30:48 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 08:01:13 AM
Quote from: nufc1984 on October 04, 2005, 06:09:14 PM
I dont want to finish 14th again this season thanks!  :tongue3:


Yep, that's exactly why I don't want to see the club plunged back into yet another "transitional" phase.


And its why i don't want to keep Souness - THAT is a ticket to 14th place.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 05, 2005, 09:01:53 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 08:30:48 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 08:01:13 AM
Quote from: nufc1984 on October 04, 2005, 06:09:14 PM
I dont want to finish 14th again this season thanks!  :tongue3:


Yep, that's exactly why I don't want to see the club plunged back into yet another "transitional" phase.


And its why i don't want to keep Souness - THAT is a ticket to 14th place.


Absolutely spot on.  I don't think anyone can argue with that statement!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 09:03:24 AM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 05, 2005, 09:01:53 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 08:30:48 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 08:01:13 AM
Quote from: nufc1984 on October 04, 2005, 06:09:14 PM
I dont want to finish 14th again this season thanks!  :tongue3:


Yep, that's exactly why I don't want to see the club plunged back into yet another "transitional" phase.


And its why i don't want to keep Souness - THAT is a ticket to 14th place.


Absolutely spot on.  I don't think anyone can argue with that statement!


Some will want to, the damned crazy fools.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 09:04:25 AM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 05, 2005, 09:01:53 AM
Absolutely spot on.  I don't think anyone can argue with that statement!


Well, apart from the fact that it parades a prediction as if it was a fact.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 09:06:51 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 09:04:25 AM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 05, 2005, 09:01:53 AM
Absolutely spot on.  I don't think anyone can argue with that statement!


Well, apart from the fact that it parades a prediction as if it was a fact.


Here's a fact for you: Souness is NOT a manager who will get a club consistently in the top half of the premiership, never mind a European place. Oh, and another one: of his signings, almost half have been worse than players we already have/recently let go.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 10:07:53 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 09:06:51 AM
Here's a fact for you: Souness is NOT a manager who will get a club consistently in the top half of the premiership, never mind a European place. Oh, and another one: of his signings, almost half have been worse than players we already have/recently let go.


No, sorry, you still haven't figured out what a fact is.

Feel free to keep trying.

This may help: https://www.m-w.com/



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 05, 2005, 10:12:52 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 10:07:53 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 09:06:51 AM
Here's a fact for you: Souness is NOT a manager who will get a club consistently in the top half of the premiership, never mind a European place. Oh, and another one: of his signings, almost half have been worse than players we already have/recently let go.


No, sorry, you still haven't figured out what a fact is.

Feel free to keep trying.

This may help: https://www.m-w.com/




OK, here's an opinion for you.  Souness is NOT a manager who will get a club consistently in the top half of the premiership, never mind a European place.  The word is different, the sentiment is the same! :tongue3:


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Bad Mongo on October 05, 2005, 10:16:28 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 05, 2005, 12:32:32 AM
Quote from: Bad Mongo on October 05, 2005, 12:08:05 AM
Yes, but against opposition of much lower standard, who had already been properly demoralized from losing 3-1 and having two players sent off at home.

But to be fair, I thought we looked good against Arsenal before Jenas was sent off. Not excellent, but better than I've come to expect.


Where are Olympiakos now ?

As for Arsenal, good try but if you think putting 9 men behind the ball and making it difficult for the opposition is "playing welll .........."

Shades of wembley 98 I think

Utter complete shite performance, on both occasions




Olympiakos recently lost at home to a Norwegian team in relegation battle (RBK), but yes, they are still in the Champions League. Then they went on to lose against Real Madrid. But apparently, they do well in the league. It's not that much of a league, though. It's a team we should beat easily.

The good things I saw against Arsenal were 1) that the midfield worked hard, and 2) that they worked together. As I said, before Jenas was sent off, and then we had 10 men behind the ball. Defensive? Yes, but it's the first coherent midfield performance I've seen from the Toon since ... perhaps against Chelski, april 2004.

Come to think of it, when a midfield consisting of Robert, Viana, Speed and Ambrose could do well against Chelsea, then why the **** does Souness need all his best players fit to even play moderatly well?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 10:18:45 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 10:07:53 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 09:06:51 AM
Here's a fact for you: Souness is NOT a manager who will get a club consistently in the top half of the premiership, never mind a European place. Oh, and another one: of his signings, almost half have been worse than players we already have/recently let go.


No, sorry, you still haven't figured out what a fact is.

Feel free to keep trying.

This may help: https://www.m-w.com/




I'm happy with my interpretation of the word "fact", and that the statements i made above ARE facts, as i see them.

For whatever reason (possibly blind ignorance, possibly to be difficult, possibly becuase you like to be a WUM for other reasons) you choose to ignore these facts, and thats up to you.

At the end of the day, all of the banal replies you can muster aren't going to make us a top 4 team under SOuness, because nothing is. But keep up the good work, you make the board so much more interesting.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 10:43:49 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 10:18:45 AM
I'm happy with my interpretation of the word "fact



I'm sure you are. But don't confuse the language you are speaking with English.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 05, 2005, 05:53:31 PM
Quote from: Bad Mongo on October 05, 2005, 10:16:28 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 05, 2005, 12:32:32 AM
Quote from: Bad Mongo on October 05, 2005, 12:08:05 AM
Yes, but against opposition of much lower standard, who had already been properly demoralized from losing 3-1 and having two players sent off at home.

But to be fair, I thought we looked good against Arsenal before Jenas was sent off. Not excellent, but better than I've come to expect.


Where are Olympiakos now ?

As for Arsenal, good try but if you think putting 9 men behind the ball and making it difficult for the opposition is "playing welll .........."

Shades of wembley 98 I think

Utter complete shite performance, on both occasions




Olympiakos recently lost at home to a Norwegian team in relegation battle (RBK), but yes, they are still in the Champions League. Then they went on to lose against Real Madrid. But apparently, they do well in the league. It's not that much of a league, though. It's a team we should beat easily.

The good things I saw against Arsenal were 1) that the midfield worked hard, and 2) that they worked together. As I said, before Jenas was sent off, and then we had 10 men behind the ball. Defensive? Yes, but it's the first coherent midfield performance I've seen from the Toon since ... perhaps against Chelski, april 2004.

Come to think of it, when a midfield consisting of Robert, Viana, Speed and Ambrose could do well against Chelsea, then why the **** does Souness need all his best players fit to even play moderatly well?


Better than poor would have been an improvement on how we played against the mighty Fulham.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 05, 2005, 05:54:54 PM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 10:43:49 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 10:18:45 AM
I'm happy with my interpretation of the word "fact



I'm sure you are. But don't confuse the language you are speaking with English.


Says the person who doesn't know the difference between result and performance.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 05, 2005, 06:53:19 PM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 10:07:53 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 09:06:51 AM
Here's a fact for you: Souness is NOT a manager who will get a club consistently in the top half of the premiership, never mind a European place. Oh, and another one: of his signings, almost half have been worse than players we already have/recently let go.


No, sorry, you still haven't figured out what a fact is.

Feel free to keep trying.

This may help: https://www.m-w.com/



I'll give you 2 facts.

1. We finished in our lowest ever position in the premiership under Souness
2. Liverpool finished in their lowest postion since the 1950;s under Souness.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 05, 2005, 07:35:06 PM
Quote from: NE5 on October 05, 2005, 06:53:19 PM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on October 05, 2005, 10:07:53 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 05, 2005, 09:06:51 AM
Here's a fact for you: Souness is NOT a manager who will get a club consistently in the top half of the premiership, never mind a European place. Oh, and another one: of his signings, almost half have been worse than players we already have/recently let go.


No, sorry, you still haven't figured out what a fact is.

Feel free to keep trying.

This may help: https://www.m-w.com/



I'll give you 2 facts.

1. We finished in our lowest ever position in the premiership under Souness
2. Liverpool finished in their lowest postion since the 1950;s under Souness.




Are they facts in our universe or his?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Armchair Pundit on October 15, 2005, 03:37:03 PM
I'm sure there must be some people out there that are still inclined to defend Souness... BUT, every game that we let go by with him as manager regardless of the results being poor and the performances being terrible is another game nearer the end of the season when we WILL lose Owen and probably several other good key players due to them wanting to be at a club where they have a chance of winning things and playing in Europe. Trophies would be nothing short of a miracle and the way things are going with the way we're playing so would a European place at the end of the season. Souness looks the part of a manager, he fights his team's corner, he stands on the touchline and shouts at the players and he gives endless reasons for us not winning matches (which is nothing to do with him by his accounts). What he doesn't do is effective man-management, motivation or have any tactical knowledge, which are sadly the more important parts of being a manager. It might get him through lower leagues but not the Premiership, if he doesn't go soon we will be Blackburn Rovers equivalent... at best.  bluesigh.gif


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 15, 2005, 03:40:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair Pundit on October 15, 2005, 03:37:03 PM
I'm sure there must be some people out there that are still inclined to defend Souness... BUT, every game that we let go by with him as manager regardless of the results being poor and the performances being terrible is another game nearer the end of the season when we WILL lose Owen and probably several other good key players due to them wanting to be at a club where they have a chance of winning things and playing in Europe. Trophies would be nothing short of a miracle and the way things are going with the way we're playing so would a European place at the end of the season. Souness looks the part of a manager, he fights his team's corner, he stands on the touchline and shouts at the players and he gives endless reasons for us not winning matches (which is nothing to do with him by his accounts). What he doesn't do is effective man-management, motivation or have any tactical knowledge, which are sadly the more important parts of being a manager. It might get him through lower leagues but not the Premiership, if he doesn't go soon we will be Blackburn Rovers equivalent... at best.  bluesigh.gif


I agree with all of that, every game with him gives us less chance of doing anything this season and will knock on to next season.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 15, 2005, 05:18:23 PM
Does anybody want to go and edit an old post?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 15, 2005, 07:24:38 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 15, 2005, 05:18:23 PM
Does anybody want to go and edit an old post?


bump...again



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 16, 2005, 12:48:01 PM
Quote from: NE5 on October 15, 2005, 07:24:38 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 15, 2005, 05:18:23 PM
Does anybody want to go and edit an old post?


bump...again



well no one has edited any yet !



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:08:53 PM
It's always the same with the Souness lovers. They only come out of the woodwork when we get a run of a few draws together. Some people just haven't got a clue about football but still try and persuade us that they know Souness will come good. What on earth they can base that on is beyond me.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:11:54 PM
Oh and 40 points from 38 games. Thats what he has got us.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: BlufPurdi on October 16, 2005, 02:14:16 PM
Who's  still trying to claim he'll come good exactly?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:16:31 PM
Quote from: BlufPurdi on October 16, 2005, 02:14:16 PM
Who's  still trying to claim he'll come good exactly?


Taylor 27 probably.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: The Shaman on October 16, 2005, 02:17:28 PM
Quote from: BlufPurdi on October 16, 2005, 02:14:16 PM
Who's  still trying to claim he'll come good exactly?


I could name quite a few actually, but in doing that i'd be starting a witchhunt.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 16, 2005, 02:19:33 PM
Quote from: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:11:54 PM
Oh and 40 points from 38 games. Thats what he has got us.


Is that serious?  Is that what he's achieved in his time at SJP?  And some people still doubt that he should go! Geez........... :roll:


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:20:50 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 16, 2005, 02:19:33 PM
Quote from: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:11:54 PM
Oh and 40 points from 38 games. Thats what he has got us.


Is that serious?  Is that what he's achieved in his time at SJP?  And some people still doubt that he should go! Geez........... :roll:


Yep and before his backers ask SBR achieved 56 points from his last 38 games in charge. But of course Souness has improved the squad since then.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 17, 2005, 01:09:25 AM
Quote from: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:20:50 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 16, 2005, 02:19:33 PM
Quote from: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:11:54 PM
Oh and 40 points from 38 games. Thats what he has got us.


Is that serious?  Is that what he's achieved in his time at SJP?  And some people still doubt that he should go! Geez........... :roll:


Yep and before his backers ask SBR achieved 56 points from his last 38 games in charge. But of course Souness has improved the squad since then.


STILL no posts from Ozzie and the rest of the "Souness must be given time" crowd .....

Wonder why ?




Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 17, 2005, 08:54:23 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 17, 2005, 01:09:25 AM
Quote from: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:20:50 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 16, 2005, 02:19:33 PM
Quote from: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:11:54 PM
Oh and 40 points from 38 games. Thats what he has got us.


Is that serious?  Is that what he's achieved in his time at SJP?  And some people still doubt that he should go! Geez........... :roll:


Yep and before his backers ask SBR achieved 56 points from his last 38 games in charge. But of course Souness has improved the squad since then.


STILL no posts from Ozzie and the rest of the "Souness must be given time" crowd .....

Wonder why ?





They are probably picking a new name for the forum.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 09:01:51 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 17, 2005, 01:09:25 AM
Quote from: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:20:50 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on October 16, 2005, 02:19:33 PM
Quote from: Kevin Carr's Gloves on October 16, 2005, 02:11:54 PM
Oh and 40 points from 38 games. Thats what he has got us.


Is that serious?  Is that what he's achieved in his time at SJP?  And some people still doubt that he should go! Geez........... :roll:


Yep and before his backers ask SBR achieved 56 points from his last 38 games in charge. But of course Souness has improved the squad since then.


STILL no posts from Ozzie and the rest of the "Souness must be given time" crowd .....

Wonder why ?





Is it because recent events have made it blindingly obvious that they were wrong, and they don't want to admit it? Or am i being too cynical?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Toon4Life on October 17, 2005, 09:08:30 AM

Let's not turn this into an US vs. THEM forum. It's obvious to EVERYONE now that Souness must go. Let's focus our collective energy on making sure that happens, rather than waste it on each other.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 09:10:21 AM
Quote from: Toon4Life on October 17, 2005, 09:08:30 AM
Let's not turn this into an US vs. THEM forum. It's obvious to EVERYONE now that Souness must go. Let's focus our collective energy on making sure that happens, rather than waste it on each other.


There'll still be a few who won't accept it, they'll just be trying to think of ways to twist the stats to fit their arguments.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Toon4Life on October 17, 2005, 09:17:24 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 09:10:21 AM
Quote from: Toon4Life on October 17, 2005, 09:08:30 AM
Let's not turn this into an US vs. THEM forum. It's obvious to EVERYONE now that Souness must go. Let's focus our collective energy on making sure that happens, rather than waste it on each other.


There'll still be a few who won't accept it, they'll just be trying to think of ways to twist the stats to fit their arguments.


Well yes that may be true. But who gives a ****? it's not like they'd stand in our way of getting our voices heard. Those fans who still believe in Souness mean nothing in the sense that there are thousands more who want the **** booted out.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 17, 2005, 09:24:31 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 09:10:21 AM
Quote from: Toon4Life on October 17, 2005, 09:08:30 AM
Let's not turn this into an US vs. THEM forum. It's obvious to EVERYONE now that Souness must go. Let's focus our collective energy on making sure that happens, rather than waste it on each other.


There'll still be a few who won't accept it, they'll just be trying to think of ways to twist the stats to fit their arguments.


I think Einstein would be hard pressed to argue that 40 pts from 38 games leads to the Champions League.  I'd love to think Souness would stay to the end of the year (Spurs v. Newcastle on 31st Dec).  The reality is Souness's day of reckoning is very near, if he was a dog he would have been put down by now to put him out of his misery.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Rodhaminho on October 17, 2005, 09:26:07 AM
I worry that shepard does not have the balls to sack him!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Slugsy on October 17, 2005, 09:27:27 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 09:10:21 AM
Quote from: Toon4Life on October 17, 2005, 09:08:30 AM
Let's not turn this into an US vs. THEM forum. It's obvious to EVERYONE now that Souness must go. Let's focus our collective energy on making sure that happens, rather than waste it on each other.


There'll still be a few who won't accept it, they'll just be trying to think of ways to twist the stats to fit their arguments.


Come on NM, surely he deserves more time, its our injuries, no sorry, its the ref's fault, its sod's law, no sorry, it's the fans fault for doubting him, no sorry.......GET RID!!!!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: well-aye on October 17, 2005, 10:02:53 AM
what souness has done right is in gettin the right players out and into the club, i dont think anyone will disagree with that.

But hes a crap manager, tactically shite, no motivation skills, poor man managment skills. In all honesty the players we had for the wigan game still shud have dun the job in my opinion (even with wigans recent good form)

Now lets compare the managment skills of Souness and Mourinho for the last game:

Both had their teams down 1-0 at half time to bolton and wigan. Mourinho obviously changed tactics and must have given a very inspiring half time team talk to his players and they came out and scored 5 winning 5-1 (albeit playing at home)

Souness on the other hand did nowt judging by the way we played second half, no tactics accept to bring on Emre which was a no brainer.

Now there lies your problem (along with the entire coaching staff coz im sorry blaming the pitch for not warming up and down in training sessions just does not sit with me), even once we have our full team back (but who knows when that will be) how is souness goin to be able to motivate. He has been quoted as saying when he took over the job that he doesnt really believe in tactics, he belives in getting his best team out and they SHUD do the job.......absolute bullshit even Mourinho knows that and look at the squad hes got.

In conclusion lets thank souness for the way he has built our squad but he is incapable of doin anything with it. And altho maybe sackin souness now would not neccassarily be the best move judging by who is available to take over the sackin shud be made by the latest June 2006 for the appointment of one Mr Otmar Hitzfeld in July 2006 (thats when he wants to make his managerial return!).... Actually screw it il take Ranieri Now!! bluebiggrin.gif

p.s. this will NEVER happen as Freddy knows nowt about running a football club just knows how to take his cheque book out and thinks that'l do. Sorry boss but it wont. 


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Rodhaminho on October 17, 2005, 10:09:12 AM
When emre was about to come onto the pitch did you all notice that him and souness look genuinely good mates. TBH i think most of the players like him. Straight talking guy from what clarky said on golas on sunday. I don't think clarky would lie.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 10:14:24 AM
Quote from: well-aye on October 17, 2005, 10:02:53 AM
what souness has done right is in gettin the right players out and into the club, i dont think anyone will disagree with that.


SOME of the right players out, SOME of the wrong ones. SOME of the right players in, SOME of the wrong ones.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Rodhaminho on October 17, 2005, 10:17:51 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 10:14:24 AM
Quote from: well-aye on October 17, 2005, 10:02:53 AM
what souness has done right is in gettin the right players out and into the club, i dont think anyone will disagree with that.


SOME of the right players out, SOME of the wrong ones. SOME of the right players in, SOME of the wrong ones.

Certainly one of the more positive sides of his mangement.

He has brung in some cracking players TBH. I wasn't sad to see any1 leave apart from hughes but that was just a little bit.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 10:22:15 AM
Quote from: The mackem killer on October 17, 2005, 10:17:51 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 10:14:24 AM
Quote from: well-aye on October 17, 2005, 10:02:53 AM
what souness has done right is in gettin the right players out and into the club, i dont think anyone will disagree with that.


SOME of the right players out, SOME of the wrong ones. SOME of the right players in, SOME of the wrong ones.

Certainly one of the more positive sides of his mangement.

He has brung in some cracking players TBH. I wasn't sad to see any1 leave apart from hughes but that was just a little bit.


I was sad to see Bellmay go, because he left due to a situation manufactured by Souness. I was also sad to see Hughes go, especially as he was replaced by no-one.

Of the players he's brough in, just over half are excellent/good/HOPEFULLY good. Teh rest are bollox. And there are questions over to what extent he is actually involved in transfers, which also clouds the issue.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: RXGTRs on October 17, 2005, 10:34:50 AM
those who want Souness out are obviously short of real football knowledge, we have always been an average team just kept up by a certain Shearer who can no longer do it for us now.  Souness has to totally rebuild an average team and with the injuries mounting it is not helping. stop this Souness Out shit, if Souness has a full team still playing like this, then we should and entitled to call for his head. Def not now..


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 17, 2005, 10:48:03 AM
Quote from: RXGTRs on October 17, 2005, 10:34:50 AM
those who want Souness out are obviously short of real football knowledge, we have always been an average team just kept up by a certain Shearer who can no longer do it for us now.  Souness has to totally rebuild an average team and with the injuries mounting it is not helping. stop this Souness Out shit, if Souness has a full team still playing like this, then we should and entitled to call for his head. Def not now..


Well done. You have restored my faith in human stupidity.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: well-aye on October 17, 2005, 11:29:11 AM
Those of you that want to keep souness obviously are happy with being a mid table team. That wont do for me with the stadium, players and most of all fans we have. We need to be challenging for a top 4/5 finish but it WILL NOT happen with Souness.

So why keep him???


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Slugsy on October 17, 2005, 11:48:37 AM
Quote from: RXGTRs on October 17, 2005, 10:34:50 AM
those who want Souness out are obviously short of real football knowledge, we have always been an average team just kept up by a certain Shearer who can no longer do it for us now. Souness has to totally rebuild an average team and with the injuries mounting it is not helping. stop this Souness Out shit, if Souness has a full team still playing like this, then we should and entitled to call for his head. Def not now..


I don't like to be derogatory to others on the board for their opinions or beliefs, but I think your an idiot who clearly hasn't watched any games over the last 12 months.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: ticaL on October 17, 2005, 11:50:32 AM
Quote from: Slugsy on October 17, 2005, 11:48:37 AM
Quote from: RXGTRs on October 17, 2005, 10:34:50 AM
those who want Souness out are obviously short of real football knowledge, we have always been an average team just kept up by a certain Shearer who can no longer do it for us now. Souness has to totally rebuild an average team and with the injuries mounting it is not helping. stop this Souness Out shit, if Souness has a full team still playing like this, then we should and entitled to call for his head. Def not now..


I don't like to be derogatory to others on the board for their opinions or beliefs, but I think your an idiot who clearly hasn't watched any games over the last 12 months.


Agreed...


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Rebellious on October 17, 2005, 11:59:07 AM
Just for the record Saturday was the first time ever i turned a game off half way through, let alone a NUFC. It was part the absoulte shambles i was witnessing tactically and the players performance, not to mention within the space of a few minutes having a penalty turned down (  since been proved not to be), Shearers goal disallowed and Owen getting penalised for getting hacked down on the edge of there area.
For the Souness haters i argued with last week you will know if you look back since day one i have been 50/50 and yes i am finally being swung towards more like 80/20 get him out. The 20 percent of my opinion not wanting out is only born from the bad luck we seem to suffer EVERY week.
I think what we are seeing is an obvious highlight of just how good a manager SBR was and how he made us look so good for so long before he became stale.
The job handed to Souness i feel is now done, he has upgraded our first eleven at the expense of loosing our depth this is now transparent. The only thing that i feel can save us now is either another massive spending spree in january or another top manager that can get a team outperforming its own level. If we could get both then superb.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NewcastleRocker on October 17, 2005, 12:46:42 PM
Souness needs to go. I have been a firm believer that the man would turn us around this year, but 15 months of this man in charge has turned us into midtable fodder, instead of pushing 4th place.

We need Hitzfield, we need a manager with tactical abilities, we need new coaching staff, new need new medical staff, we need more squad depth.




Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Skeletor on October 17, 2005, 01:27:07 PM
Quote from: The mackem killer on October 17, 2005, 10:09:12 AM
When emre was about to come onto the pitch did you all notice that him and souness look genuinely good mates. TBH i think most of the players like him. Straight talking guy from what clarky said on golas on sunday. I don't think clarky would lie.


I saw more of a "You what?" kinda look come on Emre's face when Souness was giving him instructions. He probably said "don't try to do anything adventurous, just sit deep with Parker and defend".


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: The Shaman on October 17, 2005, 02:11:25 PM
Quote from: Rebellious on October 17, 2005, 11:59:07 AM
Just for the record Saturday was the first time ever i turned a game off half way through, let alone a NUFC. It was part the absoulte shambles i was witnessing tactically and the players performance, not to mention within the space of a few minutes having a penalty turned down (  since been proved not to be), Shearers goal disallowed and Owen getting penalised for getting hacked down on the edge of there area.
For the Souness haters i argued with last week you will know if you look back since day one i have been 50/50 and yes i am finally being swung towards more like 80/20 get him out. The 20 percent of my opinion not wanting out is only born from the bad luck we seem to suffer EVERY week.I think what we are seeing is an obvious highlight of just how good a manager SBR was and how he made us look so good for so long before he became stale.
The job handed to Souness i feel is now done, he has upgraded our first eleven at the expense of loosing our depth this is now transparent. The only thing that i feel can save us now is either another massive spending spree in january or another top manager that can get a team outperforming its own level. If we could get both then superb.



Re: my argument on the second last page of the "No More Excuses" thread. It's an argument that bashes the "constant run of bad luck" excuse on the head imho - it might just overhaul that 20% worth of doubt that you still harbour when it comes to the contentious issue of getting Clueless out  bluewink.gif


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Darth Toon on October 17, 2005, 02:18:26 PM
As I've mentioned somewhere else as well, the injury situation isn't actually all that bad at the moment - if you look at the players we're likely to have available at the weekend, there's only probably Luque and possibly Babayaro who would definitely start - Man Utd turned the mackems over easily away from home despite missing 7 first-teamers.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Kyzer Sosay on October 17, 2005, 02:45:40 PM
Quote from: Darth Toon on October 17, 2005, 02:18:26 PM
As I've mentioned somewhere else as well, the injury situation isn't actually all that bad at the moment - if you look at the players we're likely to have available at the weekend, there's only probably Luque and possibly Babayaro who would definitely start - Man Utd turned the mackems over easily away from home despite missing 7 first-teamers.




we're a long way off the team that Man U are mate


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 17, 2005, 02:47:59 PM
Quote from: well-aye on October 17, 2005, 10:02:53 AM
what souness has done right is in gettin the right players out and into the club, i dont think anyone will disagree with that.


not a chance of me agreeing with that

Quote:
But hes a crap manager, tactically shite, no motivation skills, poor man managment skills. In all honesty the players we had for the wigan game still shud have dun the job in my opinion (even with wigans recent good form)


but I do agree with that




Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: well-aye on October 17, 2005, 03:52:59 PM
wot so u dont agree with these transfers overall:

in

Babayaro - Cover but get rid in Jan
Boum - Give him a chance
Parker - Quality
Emre - Quality
Luque - Quaility
Moore - Decent Cover
Clarke - Decent Cover
Owen - Quality
Solano - Quality
Faye - Cover but get rid in Jan

Out

Bernard - Gud player but ego problem
Bellamy - Gud player but defo prefer Owen
Kluivert - Not enuf passion
Hughes - Wud have kept 4 cover
O'brian - Absolute Wank
Robert - Inconsistant prefer Luque and Nzogbia
Ambrose - Decent Player but best he moved on
Viana - Never guna make it in the PL
Butt - Wank
Jenas - Overrated, gud business
Milner - Vital Experience and will have him back at the end of the season

It seems like quite a gud record of transfers but i do agree that better cover is needed in places. Overall thats the best thing hes done for the toon but his managment skills dont exist.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 17, 2005, 03:57:02 PM
Babayaro - cover? For who exactly?

And what was Bernard's ego problem? Wanting parity with other first teamers?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: BlufPurdi on October 17, 2005, 04:07:33 PM
Hate to say this, but there's nothing to suggest Luque is going to be a success here in the PL.  So where 'Quality' came from, I don't know.

Baba is awful but getting rid would be insane, leaving us with Elliot. 

Kluivert, Hughes and Ambrose should all have been kept.  How I'd love to have seen Owen and Kluivert together, no Shearer and Owen.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 17, 2005, 04:16:10 PM
Quote from: RXGTRs on October 17, 2005, 10:34:50 AM
those who want Souness out are obviously short of real football knowledge, we have always been an average team just kept up by a certain Shearer who can no longer do it for us now.  Souness has to totally rebuild an average team and with the injuries mounting it is not helping. stop this Souness Out shit, if Souness has a full team still playing like this, then we should and entitled to call for his head. Def not now..


I'll put my football knowledge up against yours any day of the week.  I've predicted virtually the whole script with him and as yet waiting to be proven wrong on anything I've said about him.  It could happen, but lets face it, it's not going to happen now, that leopard will not change it's spots.

We were always an average team before Shearer arrived, of course we were .  Where were we in the league the season before he joined us?  Not decades before, just over 3 months before.  I'll give you a clue, Shearer made his dubut at Wembley.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Shak on October 17, 2005, 04:17:00 PM
I assume he meant Baba was cover til we could get someone better in.

Nothing to suggest Luque is going to be a success other than the years of good performances he's had for Spain and Deportivo. He's a risk alright, but one worth taking IMO. Certainly money better spent than on Viana for instance.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 17, 2005, 04:20:01 PM
Quote from: Rebellious on October 17, 2005, 11:59:07 AM
Just for the record Saturday was the first time ever i turned a game off half way through, let alone a NUFC. It was part the absoulte shambles i was witnessing tactically and the players performance, not to mention within the space of a few minutes having a penalty turned down (  since been proved not to be), Shearers goal disallowed and Owen getting penalised for getting hacked down on the edge of there area.
For the Souness haters i argued with last week you will know if you look back since day one i have been 50/50 and yes i am finally being swung towards more like 80/20 get him out. The 20 percent of my opinion not wanting out is only born from the bad luck we seem to suffer EVERY week.
I think what we are seeing is an obvious highlight of just how good a manager SBR was and how he made us look so good for so long before he became stale.
The job handed to Souness i feel is now done, he has upgraded our first eleven at the expense of loosing our depth this is now transparent. The only thing that i feel can save us now is either another massive spending spree in january or another top manager that can get a team outperforming its own level. If we could get both then superb.



A spending spree in january is too late, even if it did work, a good new manager will gain more points than Souness ever will.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: BlufPurdi on October 17, 2005, 04:23:11 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 17, 2005, 04:17:00 PM
I assume he meant Baba was cover til we could get someone better in.

Nothing to suggest Luque is going to be a success other than the years of good performances he's had for Spain and Deportivo. He's a risk alright, but one worth taking IMO. Certainly money better spent than on Viana for instance.


*cough* Morientes.

What a raving success.  But I know what you mean, but he has to prove it, he's not yet.  I know he hasn't had the chance, just pointing out we can't be 100% he is going to a success.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Shak on October 17, 2005, 04:31:24 PM
Quote from: BlufPurdi on October 17, 2005, 04:23:11 PM
Quote from: Shak on October 17, 2005, 04:17:00 PM
I assume he meant Baba was cover til we could get someone better in.

Nothing to suggest Luque is going to be a success other than the years of good performances he's had for Spain and Deportivo. He's a risk alright, but one worth taking IMO. Certainly money better spent than on Viana for instance.


*cough* Morientes.

What a raving success.  But I know what you mean, but he has to prove it, he's not yet.  I know he hasn't had the chance, just pointing out we can't be 100% he is going to a success.


Fair point.

He's a big, physical player so he should be OK, but like you say we can't be 100% he'll produce the goods.

On a side note, who's the most succesful Spanish player ever in the Premiership? Can't remember a whole lot of them actually playing here.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: HTT on October 17, 2005, 04:34:32 PM
Alonso - European Cup winner. Great player, one of the best ball playing midfielders in football and a joy to watch, never seems to have a bad game whenever I've watched him and the Liverpool fans love him. With good reason, he's a class player and unlike some foreign players, he enjoys a tackle and can get stuck in with the best of them.



Title: Those wanting rid of Souness
Post by: varadi on October 17, 2005, 05:54:55 PM
Question for those who want rid of Souness...............

Having seen our performances so far this season do you think with our current squad,same injuries etc we would be in a better position under Jose Mourinho?

I am no Souness lover nor do i see the sense in those spouting such shite as "Sunday is a no lose for Nufc. We win then good, lose and Souness might be sacked"

This bollocks will do no-one any good.

Opinions gentlemen?


Title: Re: Those wanting rid of Souness
Post by: HTT on October 17, 2005, 05:57:28 PM
Do we really need another thread on this?

I'll be merging it with one of the others as it could easily go in there.


Title: Re: Those wanting rid of Souness
Post by: Martin Jol on October 17, 2005, 05:59:07 PM
Easy question.  Without a shadow of a doubt, yes, Newcastle would be better.

Love him or loathe him (personally I loathe him), you can't deny his ability to motivate players (eg Joe Cole) into a lot better than they were and to change tactics with a purpose (eg v. Bolton on saturday).

Nothing else to say.


Title: Re: Those wanting rid of Souness
Post by: Mick on October 17, 2005, 06:42:10 PM
Quote from: Howaythetoon on October 17, 2005, 05:57:28 PM
Do we really need another thread on this?

I'll be merging it with one of the others as it could easily go in there.


I think a few threads need merging, we also have a few which are going on about Hitzfeld and quite a bit is now being repeated.


Title: Re: Those wanting rid of Souness
Post by: CaliMag on October 17, 2005, 07:07:06 PM
Quote from: varadi on October 17, 2005, 05:54:55 PM
Question for those who want rid of Souness...............

Having seen our performances so far this season do you think with our current squad,same injuries etc we would be in a better position under Jose Mourinho?

I am no Souness lover nor do i see the sense in those spouting such shite as "Sunday is a no lose for Nufc. We win then good, lose and Souness might be sacked"

This bollocks will do no-one any good.

Opinions gentlemen?


Look Mourinho is not a god, but I (and many other people on the old HTT Board) wanted him even before he won the CL with Porto.

He won the CL and the UEFA Cup with a club from a third rate league on less than 5m pounds. He has studied under SBR and van Gaal and knows how to manage a team - he is absolutely positively better than Souness and would certainly have better results from this team even with injuries.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 17, 2005, 07:24:12 PM
Quote from: well-aye on October 17, 2005, 03:52:59 PM
wot so u dont agree with these transfers overall:

in

Babayaro - Cover but get rid in Jan
Boum - Give him a chance
Parker - Quality
Emre - Quality
Luque - Quaility
Moore - Decent Cover
Clarke - Decent Cover
Owen - Quality
Solano - Quality
Faye - Cover but get rid in Jan

Out

Bernard - Gud player but ego problem
Bellamy - Gud player but defo prefer Owen
Kluivert - Not enuf passion
Hughes - Wud have kept 4 cover
O'brian - Absolute Wank
Robert - Inconsistant prefer Luque and Nzogbia
Ambrose - Decent Player but best he moved on
Viana - Never guna make it in the PL
Butt - Wank
Jenas - Overrated, gud business
Milner - Vital Experience and will have him back at the end of the season

It seems like quite a gud record of transfers but i do agree that better cover is needed in places. Overall thats the best thing hes done for the toon but his managment skills dont exist.


Babayaro - Cover but get rid in Jan talent but waste of space
Boum - Give him a chance alright but overpriced
Parker - Quality quality
Emre - Quality quality
Luque - Quaility not too impressed, proved nothing, especially for 9m quid
Moore - Decent Cover  bigger load of shite it is harder to imagine
Clarke - Decent Cover why ?
Owen - Quality yes, but could have got him for 3m less and bought a replacement for
Ameobi with the change.
Solano - Quality was good with Bellamy running into space to hit balls at, let's hope he still is
Faye - Cover but get rid in Jan see Moore

Out

Bernard - Gud player but ego problem compared to his replacement for more money ?
Bellamy - Gud player but defo prefer Owen top quality player who Owen hasn't replaced anyway and was the last player at the club that I would have sold.
Kluivert - Not enuf passion load of shit
Hughes - Wud have kept 4 cover great utility player and should still be here - sold because he was a friend and ally of Bellamy
O'brian - Absolute Wank not good, but hardly justifies replacing with Moore, I'd rather have
O'Brien

Robert - Inconsistant prefer Luque and Nzogbia he's still on loan
Ambrose - Decent Player but best he moved on unproven potential, should still be here
Viana - Never guna make it in the PL agreed but amazing how long it took people to see
Butt - Wank wierd how he was pretty good for manu and us until Souness walked in
Jenas - Overrated, gud business wasn't going to get better but have an awful feeling his career may prosper now with a proper manager etc
Milner - Vital Experience and will have him back at the end of the season no pace to be a winger but don't let him go just yet

All these changes, for 50m quid .



Title: Re: Those wanting rid of Souness
Post by: NE5 on October 17, 2005, 07:26:21 PM
Quote from: varadi on October 17, 2005, 05:54:55 PM
Question for those who want rid of Souness...............

Having seen our performances so far this season do you think with our current squad,same injuries etc we would be in a better position under Jose Mourinho?

I am no Souness lover nor do i see the sense in those spouting such shite as "Sunday is a no lose for Nufc. We win then good, lose and Souness might be sacked"

This bollocks will do no-one any good.

Opinions gentlemen?


if i really said what I thought of that i'd be banned



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 17, 2005, 08:12:10 PM
NE5 what was you expecting from Luque? He played 120mins of football, How on earth can you judge a player like that? and the game against Manu he had'nt even had a single training with Newcastle, Then there was the international break so he didnt train with Newcastle till he came back which we all know he was injured!!!

Some of your posts are good but then other are very bad!!! Your acting as if Luque has played all season and havent performed, Why not wait till he has a few games under his belt before you judge him, Or should i say before you right him off


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 17, 2005, 08:19:10 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 17, 2005, 08:12:10 PM
NE5 what was you expecting from Luque? He played 120mins of football, How on earth can you judge a player like that? and the game against Manu he had'nt even had a single training with Newcastle, Then there was the international break so he didnt train with Newcastle till he came back which we all know he was injured!!!

Some of your posts are good but then other are very bad!!! Your acting as if Luque has played all season and havent performed, Why not wait till he has a few games under his belt before you judge him, Or should i say before you right him off


Whats wrong with making an instant judgement ?

I made one about Emre, in 20 minutes against manu, and I like him, a lot. Are you saying an instant judgement is ok if it's a favourable one but not if it isn't ?

I'm just not sure about Luque, I would like him to be like Ryan Giggs has been for manu, but just have a feeling that he will be an inconsistent type, because I thought in the manu game he was inconsistent in his application within that one game, and if you do that on your debut for a club .....
I do concede the point that when he comes back he will be more settled and may be different. We will see. 9m is a lot of money though isn't it ?

It all depends. Robert was inconsistent too, but delivered fairly often, so is it a step forward at all ?




Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 17, 2005, 08:24:56 PM
No i never said an instant judgement is ok if it is favourable, You need to under the circumstances, Luque was doing his Medical earlier hours of Thursday morning, Then he had to go back to Spain on Friday and come back again, Then he was thrown into a match against Manu, He didnt even Speak any English, Didnt train with the team either, So how on earth can you expect him to do well? You are asking way to much!!! It just goes to show how narrow minded you are if you Judge a player after 20 mins, Would you say Woody is a good or bad player?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 17, 2005, 08:34:00 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 17, 2005, 08:24:56 PM
No i never said an instant judgement is ok if it is favourable, You need to under the circumstances, Luque was doing his Medical earlier hours of Thursday morning, Then he had to go back to Spain on Friday and come back again, Then he was thrown into a match against Manu, He didnt even Speak any English, Didnt train with the team either, So how on earth can you expect him to do well? You are asking way to much!!! It just goes to show how narrow minded you are if you Judge a player after 20 mins, Would you say Woody is a good or bad player?


Woodgate ? I saw him for Leeds at 19 .......

I don't consider myself narrow minded mate, sorry like. I thought Kluivert would be a waste of time even before he came when he was nothing but a hot rumour....saw Viana once and said he wouldn't adjust to the premiership...would you say those 2 opinions were narrow minded or correct.

I don't know about Luque, all I'm saying is those who think he is "quality" before he's played a game are being a bit premature...the same as you are saying I am !





Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 17, 2005, 08:38:20 PM
I said your Narrow minded because you judged Luque after 120 mins and things were'nt easy for Luque, You are way to quick to judge him, I've watched a lot of Spainish Football and i think Luque was Class and has everything needed to be a huge success but untill he has a good run of games we wont know, Im not writting him off just because he didnt score a hat trick in his first game against a very good Manu side


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: BlufPurdi on October 17, 2005, 08:42:17 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 17, 2005, 08:38:20 PM
I said your Narrow minded because you judged Luque after 120 mins and things were'nt easy for Luque, You are way to quick to judge him, I've watched a lot of Spainish Football and i think Luque was Class and has everything needed to be a huge success but untill he has a good run of games we wont know, Im not writting him off just because he didnt score a hat trick in his first game against a very good Manu side


He hasn't judged him, he's pointed out there's nothing to guarentee Luque will be successful here in the Premiership.  He may not adjust, I agree.  I've not written him off, he's just technically a risk but he was a success in Spain.  So was Morientes...


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: bulivye on October 18, 2005, 12:22:39 AM
i really want FF to be using souness like a rented mule--use and abuse then send it back where you got it, or put it down.  GS has done all he was ever going to be capable of at nufc and to my mind FF has let it go on 6 games to long...  on to the next mgr Hitzfeld!!!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Slugsy on October 18, 2005, 08:54:54 AM
Quote from: BlufPurdi on October 17, 2005, 08:42:17 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 17, 2005, 08:38:20 PM
I said your Narrow minded because you judged Luque after 120 mins and things were'nt easy for Luque, You are way to quick to judge him, I've watched a lot of Spainish Football and i think Luque was Class and has everything needed to be a huge success but untill he has a good run of games we wont know, Im not writting him off just because he didnt score a hat trick in his first game against a very good Manu side




He hasn't judged him, he's pointed out there's nothing to guarentee Luque will be successful here in the Premiership. He may not adjust, I agree. I've not written him off, he's just technically a risk but he was a success in Spain. So was Morientes...


I agree too!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 18, 2005, 08:59:41 AM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 17, 2005, 08:38:20 PM
I said your Narrow minded because you judged Luque after 120 mins and things were'nt easy for Luque, You are way to quick to judge him, I've watched a lot of Spainish Football and i think Luque was Class and has everything needed to be a huge success but untill he has a good run of games we wont know, Im not writting him off just because he didnt score a hat trick in his first game against a very good Manu side


Here's how i see it - it is wrong to say, based on 120 minutes or whatever, that Luque isn't up to it.

HOWEVER, it is equally wrong to say that he is going to be class. His form abroad is totally irrelevant in this issue.

Wait and see how he'll be. Don't build him up too much, don't know him down yet. Building up players too soon can make good ones average (Jenas) and average ones shite (Bramble).


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 18, 2005, 04:33:34 PM
I agree, I just want him back to see if he can be as good in the Premiership. IMO you cant judge a player good or bad after 120 mins


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 19, 2005, 10:15:51 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 15, 2005, 05:18:23 PM
Does anybody want to go and edit an old post?


bump .. again



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 12:04:52 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 19, 2005, 10:15:51 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 15, 2005, 05:18:23 PM
Does anybody want to go and edit an old post?


bump .. again




The WUM appears to have nothing much to say right now ............



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 12:39:33 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 12:04:52 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 19, 2005, 10:15:51 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 15, 2005, 05:18:23 PM
Does anybody want to go and edit an old post?


bump .. again




The WUM appears to have nothing much to say right now ............



aahhh he's back, on another thread.

It appears that he disappeared for a few days when all his opinions about our manager have been totally shot to shreds, as if many people needed more proof anyway.

I wonder if he will change any posts, after all, only a child wouldn't admit they are wrong .....



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 20, 2005, 08:38:50 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 12:39:33 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 12:04:52 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 19, 2005, 10:15:51 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 15, 2005, 05:18:23 PM
Does anybody want to go and edit an old post?


bump .. again




The WUM appears to have nothing much to say right now ............



aahhh he's back, on another thread.

It appears that he disappeared for a few days when all his opinions about our manager have been totally shot to shreds, as if many people needed more proof anyway.

I wonder if he will change any posts, after all, only a child wouldn't admit they are wrong .....




A child or Souness.....oh, i see. Never mind.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: HTT on October 20, 2005, 09:45:39 AM
It's daft to judge Luque on what little he has played yet in my opinion - whether you rate him highly or not at all.

What I saw however, I liked. He sent in some very good crosses and the one against Fulham in the opening minutes that Shearer couldn't get to (or was that Man Utd?) was sublime.

I think he'll be a success here for me, it's very rare to be able to safely say a player can not cut it or if a player is going to be a huge success based on the very little that Luque has played though.

But I liked what I saw. Can't wait to see him in action for a number of games.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 20, 2005, 10:00:21 AM
Does anybody think this is an attempt by Souness to try and get a sympathy vote ready for Sunday?

https://home.skysports.com/list.asp?HLID=318063&CPID=8&title=Souness+


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:02:26 AM
Quote:
Butt - Wank wierd how he was pretty good for manu and us until Souness walked in


Yes, Souness is also to blame for his poor form at Birmingham. :roll:

It's good to see that you've finally noticed and admitted that Parker is a good player and not the "average" or "overrated" player you've labelled him in the past.  :lol:


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 20, 2005, 10:26:17 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 20, 2005, 10:00:21 AM
Does anybody think this is an attempt by Souness to try and get a sympathy vote ready for Sunday?

https://home.skysports.com/list.asp?HLID=318063&CPID=8&title=Souness+


Yes, it is. I don't believe the smug-faced liar for one second.

If he cared that much, he'd have made sure that we had at least one decent player in each position in summer, and maybe even a decent reserve in a few of them (crazy, i know). One good striker in the squad? Well done Graeme, you're a genius.

Whilst i don't WANT anyone to die, as that is bad (mmkay), i would be over the moon if he committed career suicide, and stepped down.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 20, 2005, 10:31:18 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 20, 2005, 10:26:17 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 20, 2005, 10:00:21 AM
Does anybody think this is an attempt by Souness to try and get a sympathy vote ready for Sunday?

https://home.skysports.com/list.asp?HLID=318063&CPID=8&title=Souness+


Yes, it is. I don't believe the smug-faced liar for one second.

If he cared that much, he'd have made sure that we had at least one decent player in each position in summer, and maybe even a decent reserve in a few of them (crazy, i know). One good striker in the squad? Well done Graeme, you're a genius.

Whilst i don't WANT anyone to die, as that is bad (mmkay), i would be over the moon if he committed career suicide, and stepped down.


Did you read the bit about Nobby?  I thought he was injured when we signed him, this is what he said:


"Kieron Dyer has a recurring problem and Albert Luque lasted barely a game and a half. Michael Owen has now got a niggle and Nobby Solano suffered a strain almost from the moment he came here. Titus Bramble has also picked up a thigh strain.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Northern Monkey on October 20, 2005, 10:34:49 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 20, 2005, 10:31:18 AM
Quote from: Northern Monkey on October 20, 2005, 10:26:17 AM
Quote from: Mick on October 20, 2005, 10:00:21 AM
Does anybody think this is an attempt by Souness to try and get a sympathy vote ready for Sunday?

https://home.skysports.com/list.asp?HLID=318063&CPID=8&title=Souness+


Yes, it is. I don't believe the smug-faced liar for one second.

If he cared that much, he'd have made sure that we had at least one decent player in each position in summer, and maybe even a decent reserve in a few of them (crazy, i know). One good striker in the squad? Well done Graeme, you're a genius.

Whilst i don't WANT anyone to die, as that is bad (mmkay), i would be over the moon if he committed career suicide, and stepped down.


Did you read the bit about Nobby?  I thought he was injured when we signed him, this is what he said:


"Kieron Dyer has a recurring problem and Albert Luque lasted barely a game and a half. Michael Owen has now got a niggle and Nobby Solano suffered a strain almost from the moment he came here. Titus Bramble has also picked up a thigh strain.




i thought so too, but it seems not.

Not that any of it is Souness' fault, of course. He's the best coach in the world.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 09:03:35 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:02:26 AM
Quote:
Butt - Wank wierd how he was pretty good for manu and us until Souness walked in


Yes, Souness is also to blame for his poor form at Birmingham. :roll:

It's good to see that you've finally noticed and admitted that Parker is a good player and not the "average" or "overrated" player you've labelled him in the past.  :lol:


find .. if you can.

How many times have YOU seen Newcastle play, or even Scott Parker !



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 09:09:32 PM
Quote:
Did you read the bit about Nobby?  I thought he was injured when we signed him, this is what he said:


"Kieron Dyer has a recurring problem and Albert Luque lasted barely a game and a half. Michael Owen has now got a niggle and Nobby Solano suffered a strain almost from the moment he came here. Titus Bramble has also picked up a thigh strain.




i thought so too, but it seems not.

Not that any of it is Souness' fault, of course. He's the best coach in the world.
Quote:


laughable isn't it. And the people who take all this crap in think they are knowledgeable and intelligent



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 20, 2005, 09:15:00 PM
Quote from: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 09:09:32 PM
Quote:
Did you read the bit about Nobby?  I thought he was injured when we signed him, this is what he said:


"Kieron Dyer has a recurring problem and Albert Luque lasted barely a game and a half. Michael Owen has now got a niggle and Nobby Solano suffered a strain almost from the moment he came here. Titus Bramble has also picked up a thigh strain.




i thought so too, but it seems not.

Not that any of it is Souness' fault, of course. He's the best coach in the world.
Quote:


laughable isn't it. And the people who take all this crap in think they are knowledgeable and intelligent




I think a lot of the Souness supporters were doing so more out of hope and blind faith, we all want what's best for the club and I think his supporters were only showing that, blindly.

I also think that support they have shown him has done more harm than good, without that support at the end of last season and he wouldn't be here now.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 09:21:15 PM
Quote from: Mick on October 20, 2005, 09:15:00 PM
Quote from: NE5 on October 20, 2005, 09:09:32 PM
Quote:
Did you read the bit about Nobby?  I thought he was injured when we signed him, this is what he said:


"Kieron Dyer has a recurring problem and Albert Luque lasted barely a game and a half. Michael Owen has now got a niggle and Nobby Solano suffered a strain almost from the moment he came here. Titus Bramble has also picked up a thigh strain.




i thought so too, but it seems not.

Not that any of it is Souness' fault, of course. He's the best coach in the world.
Quote:


laughable isn't it. And the people who take all this crap in think they are knowledgeable and intelligent




I think a lot of the Souness supporters were doing so more out of hope and blind faith, we all want what's best for the club and I think his supporters were only showing that, blindly.

I also think that support they have shown him has done more harm than good, without that support at the end of last season and he wouldn't be here now.


absolutely, and some of them won't see that either



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 20, 2005, 10:15:22 PM
Have a read of this:

https://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0500liverpoolfc/0100news/tm_objectid=16272276%26method=full%26siteid=50061-name_page.html


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 20, 2005, 10:18:16 PM
Disgraceful!!!!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 20, 2005, 10:20:46 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 20, 2005, 10:18:16 PM
Disgraceful!!!!


I'm no lover of Phil Thompson but you don't do that to people.  I know it's a one sided interview, he quotes enough names to accept that a fair bit of it's true.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 20, 2005, 10:27:12 PM
The worst thing is i kinda know what he must feel like, Where i work the Directors screwed all the workers over, The Work shop Manager sat back and recieved a bigger Bonus. Unacceptable


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: CaliMag on October 20, 2005, 10:42:58 PM
From what we all know of Souness this is an entirely plausable and likely course of events.

When does Carver get to publish his account of Souness?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:45:15 PM
Quote:
find .. if you can.


HTL, obviously you can afford to say that now, because you know the old posts aren't here.
Quote:
How many times have YOU seen Newcastle play, or even Scott Parker !


I've seen newcastle play plenty of times, why? And i also have seen Parker plenty of times, most of us saw his talents except you. Remember the thread in the old HTT forum? I think you were the only one who said that he was "overrated" and "average"! :lol:

You've always said that you're big enough to admit when you're wrong. But I didn't need this to confirm that you're not!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 10:48:56 PM
NE5 is not HTL, like.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:50:46 PM
Quote from: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 10:48:56 PM
NE5 is not HTL, like.


he is.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: CaliMag on October 20, 2005, 10:53:44 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:50:46 PM
Quote from: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 10:48:56 PM
NE5 is not HTL, like.


he is.


I don't know man. I am pretty skeptical myself.

Does this mean that you are infact "Mark" which HTL was always accusing you of?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:55:11 PM
Quote from: CaliMag on October 20, 2005, 10:53:44 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:50:46 PM
Quote from: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 10:48:56 PM
NE5 is not HTL, like.


he is.


I don't know man. I am pretty skeptical myself.

Does this mean that you are infact "Mark" which HTL was always accusing you of?


who's mark? HTL never accused me of being somebody else.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 10:57:50 PM
I can assure you, he's not.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Andy on October 20, 2005, 10:58:25 PM
And I can assure you that Wullie is correct. ;)


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:59:46 PM
why? different IP address?!! pah!



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 11:00:41 PM
I'd have thought it was pretty obvious who he was like.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Micktoon on October 20, 2005, 11:13:41 PM
Quote from: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 11:00:41 PM
I'd have thought it was pretty obvious who he was like.


I think they may need a clue.

One word, two silly bulls.

First silly bull: the old home end before the barstewards pulled it down.

Second silly bull: first three letters of a crow like bird with white bits.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 11:22:54 PM
so he's got two usernames here?! He was posting as Fraser at the same time as NE5.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Andy on October 20, 2005, 11:31:38 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 11:22:54 PM
so he's got two usernames here?! He was posting as Fraser at the same time as NE5.



What? :lol: I could be wrong here, but I'd say I'm 99.99% confident (based on e-mail address, IP address and posting style) that Fraser's a competely different user to NE5.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 11:34:20 PM
Quote from: Andy on October 20, 2005, 11:31:38 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 11:22:54 PM
so he's got two usernames here?! He was posting as Fraser at the same time as NE5.



What? :lol: I could be wrong here, but I'd say I'm 99.99% confident (based on e-mail address, IP address and posting style) that Fraser's a competely different user to NE5.


I know! that's what I'm saying! but maybe i got the name wrong.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Andy on October 20, 2005, 11:40:08 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 11:34:20 PM
Quote from: Andy on October 20, 2005, 11:31:38 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 11:22:54 PM
so he's got two usernames here?! He was posting as Fraser at the same time as NE5.



What? :lol: I could be wrong here, but I'd say I'm 99.99% confident (based on e-mail address, IP address and posting style) that Fraser's a competely different user to NE5.


I know! that's what I'm saying! but maybe i got the name wrong.


You've completely confused me here Omar. :lol:

Let's backtrack; who exactly are you saying NE5 is OR used to be, and who are you saying fraser is OR used to be?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 11:48:01 PM
NE5 HTL.

Fraser LM.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Andy on October 20, 2005, 11:56:20 PM
Well you're wrong on both accounts. ;)


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 11:57:09 PM
Fraser who really hates Craig Bellamy is really Leazes Mag who really likes Craig Bellamy?

OK.

Moral of the story: Just because you have impassioned words with someone Omar, it doesn't necessarily make them HTL or LM.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:04:05 AM
well whatever mate. :roll: don't be fooled by the different e-mails and IPs.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 21, 2005, 12:09:30 AM
If you want to think everyone who disagrees with you is HTL or LM, even those with totally different opinions to them, don't let me stop you. I'm not fooled by anything.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:15:39 AM
Quote from: Wullie on October 21, 2005, 12:09:30 AM
If you want to think everyone who disagrees with you is HTL or LM, even those with totally different opinions to them, don't let me stop you. I'm not fooled by anything.


I never accused everyone of being those two! when fraser first argued with me, he made it obvious for me to know who he really was.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Wullie on October 21, 2005, 12:18:40 AM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:15:39 AM
Quote from: Wullie on October 21, 2005, 12:09:30 AM
If you want to think everyone who disagrees with you is HTL or LM, even those with totally different opinions to them, don't let me stop you. I'm not fooled by anything.


I never accused everyone of being those two! when fraser first argued with me, he made it obvious for me to know who he really was.


Even though his opinions are fundamentally different to either of them?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Andy on October 21, 2005, 12:19:59 AM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:15:39 AM
I never accused everyone of being those two! when fraser first argued with me, he made it onvious for me to know who he really is.


But he isn't who you think he is! :lol:

Look at fraser's posts:

https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?action=profile;u=1623;sa=showPosts

How many of those sound like they're written by LM? I mean, this one is DEFENDING SOUNESS for Christ's sake:

https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,4950.msg100579.html#msg100579

Does that really sound like something Leazes would write? :lol:


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: madras on October 21, 2005, 12:21:12 AM
Quote from: Wullie on October 21, 2005, 12:18:40 AM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:15:39 AM
Quote from: Wullie on October 21, 2005, 12:09:30 AM
If you want to think everyone who disagrees with you is HTL or LM, even those with totally different opinions to them, don't let me stop you. I'm not fooled by anything.


I never accused everyone of being those two! when fraser first argued with me, he made it obvious for me to know who he really was.


Even though his opinions are fundamentally different to either of them?

blatant tactic for putting ones nose off the scent.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 21, 2005, 12:32:15 AM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:45:15 PM
Quote:
find .. if you can.


HTL, obviously you can afford to say that now, because you know the old posts aren't here.
Quote:
How many times have YOU seen Newcastle play, or even Scott Parker !


I've seen newcastle play plenty of times, why? And i also have seen Parker plenty of times, most of us saw his talents except you. Remember the thread in the old HTT forum? I think you were the only one who said that he was "overrated" and "average"! :lol:

You've always said that you're big enough to admit when you're wrong. But I didn't need this to confirm that you're not!


Well, don't make unfounded allegations, if you can't find them. And - again - I am not HTL. I realise your  brain doesn't extend to showing footballing intelligence based on fact, but you could at least accept a fact which has already been confirmed to you by an admin [ie I am not HTL]

Doh.

I am not wrong, I have never said Parker is an average player. Having said that, he is no Gazza, Ronaldhino or Zidane either, so it depends what criteria you use. So - find it if you can.

Oh sorry....your other name was Omardhinho wasn't it ? How naff and daft !

How many games have you seen Newcastle play Omardhino ?? Or are your "opinions" only based on TV ?



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 21, 2005, 12:33:20 AM
Quote from: Wullie on October 20, 2005, 10:48:56 PM
NE5 is not HTL, like.


he's been told this before Wullie.....how many times LOL



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: nufc4ever on October 21, 2005, 12:33:49 AM
Who cares who is who is who is who is who?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:34:00 AM
Read his respone towards me in this thread- https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,6429.msg125266.html#msg125266

this was the first time i communicated with fraser. he calls me "smug, self-opiniated ****" and  then says that im the sort of person that "keeps me off this board". Why would he says all of this things when this was the first time we communicated? (if that's not really LM).

He then asks me "Didn't you used to post in block?"(whatever that means!). If fraser was somone that i didn't know before, then he wouldn't have said those stuff.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: madras on October 21, 2005, 12:35:07 AM
NE5 obviuosly :tongue3:


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:36:01 AM
Quote from: NE5 on October 21, 2005, 12:32:15 AM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 20, 2005, 10:45:15 PM
Quote:
find .. if you can.


HTL, obviously you can afford to say that now, because you know the old posts aren't here.
Quote:
How many times have YOU seen Newcastle play, or even Scott Parker !


I've seen newcastle play plenty of times, why? And i also have seen Parker plenty of times, most of us saw his talents except you. Remember the thread in the old HTT forum? I think you were the only one who said that he was "overrated" and "average"! :lol:

You've always said that you're big enough to admit when you're wrong. But I didn't need this to confirm that you're not!


Well, don't make unfounded allegations, if you can't find them. And - again - I am not HTL. I realise your brain doesn't extend to showing footballing intelligence based on fact, but you could at least accept a fact which has already been confirmed to you by an admin [ie I am not HTL]

Doh.

I am not wrong, I have never said Parker is an average player. Having said that, he is no Gazza, Ronaldhino or Zidane either, so it depends what criteria you use. So - find it if you can.

Oh sorry....your other name was Omardhinho wasn't it ? How naff and daft !

How many games have you seen Newcastle play Omardhino ?? Or are your "opinions" only based on TV ?




oh dear, the same sort of stuff HTL posts. Are you really that daft?
when will you grow up. oh well never mind.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 21, 2005, 12:39:29 AM
who is fraser ? Sounds too much like Souness for me .....



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Andy on October 21, 2005, 12:42:57 AM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:34:00 AM
Read his respone towards me in this thread- https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,6429.msg125266.html#msg125266

this was the first time i communicated with fraser. he calls me "smug, self-opiniated ****" and then says that im the sort of person that "keeps me off this board". Why would he says all of this things when this was the first time we communicated? (if that's not really LM).


Maybe he's just an abusive poster, who, purely by some random coincidence, just happened to take all his abuse out on you in that one thread?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: madras on October 21, 2005, 12:44:35 AM
love is all around....every sight and every sound


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:45:05 AM
Quote from: Andy on October 21, 2005, 12:42:57 AM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 12:34:00 AM
Read his respone towards me in this thread- https://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,6429.msg125266.html#msg125266

this was the first time i communicated with fraser. he calls me "smug, self-opiniated ****" and then says that im the sort of person that "keeps me off this board". Why would he says all of this things when this was the first time we communicated? (if that's not really LM).


Maybe he's just an abusive poster, who, purely by some random coincidence, just happened to take all his abuse out on you in that one thread?


i don't know, i hardly took notice of his posts until then.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Slugsy on October 21, 2005, 08:47:15 AM
Was on my way home on the metro and was thinking about where we are at the moment as a club, a lot of what I am going to say isn't new but I think it sums up my feeling at the moment.

I have to laugh at folk who have been saying stuff like;

"We are the 5th best team in the league"

"Nobody else is showing that they are much better"

"We are only a few games away from a European spot" and then the usual

"Ifs", "Buts", "Injuries"....and on and on and on!

All of that I am afraid is total conjecture and as we have seen so far this season totally BS!

Here is the fact!

We were the 14th best team in the league last season

We are at present the 13th best team this year!

Those are the cold hard facts!  Teams like Bolton, Charlton and Spurs can rightfully say that they are better teams than us, and I am not saying on a one off game or over a couple of games, over the medium term and present, those teams (and a few more who some seem to think are lower than us, but aren't) are better than us and thats a fact, never mind what we could be like or what we should be like, we aint!

I was watching Bolton last night who came out with a good result in Europe and I thought to myself, God, all we ever do at Newcastle is winge about our injuries, but a team like Bolton can, with a so called 'weaker' team on paper, get results, week in and week out!

Yeah they might get their assess tanned by Chelsea sometimes, but who doesn't?  Overall, they are consistently proving that they can perform better as a team, regardless of who they put out on the field.

Then I look at us, or more specifically Souness, all I ever hear is excuse after excuse!  Don't get me wrong, all managers have a winge now and then, but Souness is ridiculous!

FACT: On paper we consistently put out better teams (regardless of injuries) than the likes of Bolton, Wigan and Charlton, but consistently do worse than them!

In my opinion, that isn't down to the injuries, that isn't down to the weak squad (albeit, I think it is thin in areas), that is down to Souness, who, every week, is looking for a individual to pull him out the fire, create some genius spark, score that goal etc.

Thats' fine, but first things first, lets play as a team before looking at individuals.  We as fans can be bad as well, I am no exception, criticising individual mistakes, players etc.

Newcastle United is not the 5th best team in the league, I don't think we are even the 10th best team in the league, why?  Because you can chuck all the money in the world at a team, it doesn't matter, football is a team game, not 11 talented individuals and if you don't play as a team then you don't get anywhere!

I think Charlton and Bolton are magnificent examples of where hardwork, team ethic, organisation, homework on the opposing team and downright getting stuck in gets you!

All these things I think NUFC is bereft of and what we will never have while Graeme Souness is in charge!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Robin on October 21, 2005, 09:46:10 AM
Quote from: Slugsy on October 21, 2005, 08:47:15 AM
football is a team game, not 11 talented individuals and if you don't play as a team then you don't get anywhere!


Nail and head


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 21, 2005, 09:46:55 AM
Quote from: Slugsy on October 21, 2005, 08:47:15 AM
Was on my way home on the metro and was thinking about where we are at the moment as a club, a lot of what I am going to say isn't new but I think it sums up my feeling at the moment.

I have to laugh at folk who have been saying stuff like;

"We are the 5th best team in the league"

"Nobody else is showing that they are much better"

"We are only a few games away from a European spot" and then the usual

"Ifs", "Buts", "Injuries"....and on and on and on!

All of that I am afraid is total conjecture and as we have seen so far this season totally BS!

Here is the fact!

We were the 14th best team in the league last season

We are at present the 13th best team this year!

Those are the cold hard facts!  Teams like Bolton, Charlton and Spurs can rightfully say that they are better teams than us, and I am not saying on a one off game or over a couple of games, over the medium term and present, those teams (and a few more who some seem to think are lower than us, but aren't) are better than us and thats a fact, never mind what we could be like or what we should be like, we aint!

I was watching Bolton last night who came out with a good result in Europe and I thought to myself, God, all we ever do at Newcastle is winge about our injuries, but a team like Bolton can, with a so called 'weaker' team on paper, get results, week in and week out!

Yeah they might get their assess tanned by Chelsea sometimes, but who doesn't?  Overall, they are consistently proving that they can perform better as a team, regardless of who they put out on the field.

Then I look at us, or more specifically Souness, all I ever hear is excuse after excuse!  Don't get me wrong, all managers have a winge now and then, but Souness is ridiculous!

FACT: On paper we consistently put out better teams (regardless of injuries) than the likes of Bolton, Wigan and Charlton, but consistently do worse than them!

In my opinion, that isn't down to the injuries, that isn't down to the weak squad (albeit, I think it is thin in areas), that is down to Souness, who, every week, is looking for a individual to pull him out the fire, create some genius spark, score that goal etc.

Thats' fine, but first things first, lets play as a team before looking at individuals.  We as fans can be bad as well, I am no exception, criticising individual mistakes, players etc.

Newcastle United is not the 5th best team in the league, I don't think we are even the 10th best team in the league, why?  Because you can chuck all the money in the world at a team, it doesn't matter, football is a team game, not 11 talented individuals and if you don't play as a team then you don't get anywhere!

I think Charlton and Bolton are magnificent examples of where hardwork, team ethic, organisation, homework on the opposing team and downright getting stuck in gets you!

All these things I think NUFC is bereft of and what we will never have while Graeme Souness is in charge!


Cheer up, he might be gone in 3 days time.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Howaythelads on October 21, 2005, 05:13:05 PM
Brilliant last few pages, Omar. Brilliant.

Twas' I who said that Parker is average. I hold that opinion because I believe he's had one good season at Charlton and that's all he's done. If he goes on to prove me wrong for us I'll admit it, but he has a long way to go.

I'm not NE5 and I'm not LM.

Cheers Omar. Keep it up, you're a scream.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: The Fox on October 21, 2005, 07:12:53 PM
IMO anyone who believes Souness will turn this club around is mistaken. OK there are numerous injuries but answer this have the sides he has put out and more importantly the way they have played made you excited and longing to see the next match. Have they hell, we are mediocre at best.
Its taken him a month since he moaned about the training pitch to move the squad and it has cost him further injuries in the meantime.
Does he have a tactical plan, bringing Ameobi on as sub last match what was the game plan there.
As for Parker I'm prepared to give him a decent chance, particularly as I think he's being played too deep and having to put up with the likes of Faye.
Souness has a knack of trying to fit square pegs into round holes.
A derby win will mean little as we will soon return to our usual up and down, fail miserably away from home and not finish in the top 6.
Resign yourself to that fact, this season is over and the injuries will continue even if we bang in 5 on Sunday.
Settling for mediocrity is shameful.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: decky on October 21, 2005, 07:19:34 PM
maybe Shepard doesnt want to sack him as he plans to replace him next year with Shearer, he could sack him at the end of the season and say that Souness didnt achieve enough


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 08:11:10 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on October 21, 2005, 05:13:05 PM
Brilliant last few pages, Omar. Brilliant.

Twas' I who said that Parker is average. I hold that opinion because I believe he's had one good season at Charlton and that's all he's done. If he goes on to prove me wrong for us I'll admit it, but he has a long way to go.

I'm not NE5 and I'm not LM.

Cheers Omar. Keep it up, you're a scream.


Oh shut-up you tart!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on October 21, 2005, 09:16:25 PM
Quote from: decky on October 21, 2005, 07:19:34 PM
maybe Shepard doesnt want to sack him as he plans to replace him next year with Shearer, he could sack him at the end of the season and say that Souness didnt achieve enough


I bloody well hope not!!!

I shudder to think where Newcastle could be in the league at the end of the season if he's still in charge.  I use the term 'in charge' very loosely because, quite frankly, he hasn't got a f*cking clue when he's doing!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 22, 2005, 04:23:10 AM
From the Guardian: 

https://football.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,9753,1598264,00.html


Never trust a middle-aged man, they say, who takes good care of his hair. Perhaps this is part of the problem for Graeme Souness who, in recent memory, has passed directly from corkscrew perm to grizzled Caesar cut without any kind of stabilising period in between. Yes, Souness is under the cosh again. Unfairly or not, Newcastle's game at Sunderland tomorrow is being billed as yet another make-or-breaker for football's most embattled man. DERBY D-DAY FOR 'SACK RACE' SOU, yelped the Mirror after defeat by Wigan. Certainly results have been hysterically unpredictable, votes of confidence never far away. We hear talk of a plate of sandwiches - ham and chutney - being hurled across the dressing room.

In Souness terms, however, this is far from a crisis. What are those terms exactly? Strangely for a man seemingly mired in a grand tradition of football cliche, Souness has been transforming himself of late into a true original: a manager who can leave a trail of devastation in his wake, yet always find himself immediately reappointed to another, often better, job. And there has been devastation. An internet search for the words "Graeme Souness" and "furious bust-up" produces 912 results; the same search substituting the name Archbishop George Carey comes up with only five. Similarly "Graeme Souness" and "angry war of words" has 357 hits; Mother Theresa of Calcutta and angry war of words produces just the one. So why all the gruesomeness? Maybe it's the fact that his name (squint a bit) almost is Gruesomeness. Maybe it really is always the other guy.
Except something has changed recently. In the midst of a career that reads like a demented gap year - Glasgow, Liverpool, Istanbul, Southampton, Turin, Lisbon, Blackburn - Souness has begun to edge towards a wholly unexpected national treasure status. Perhaps it started with Irvine Welsh's Trainspotting follow-up, Glue, in which Welsh's Edinburgh chancers use the word "Souness" as a battle cry towards bottle-defying feats of bravado. "Come on! Souness!" they shout at each other. Try it, it works.

Partly it's television. A flinty-eyed footballing archetype, Souness is perfect for TV. Crucially, like all great public controversialists - like your dad, perhaps - he is un-embarrassable. As such he is fatally drawn towards the embarrassing: the face-off, the dust-up, the need to plant a huge Galatasary flag in the centre circle of hated rivals Fenerbahce's pitch after winning the Turkish cup final. No, dad. Stop. Oh god, he's off again

What are we going to do with him? A man out of time in the Premiership he may be; but a Souness-less world is somehow unthinkable. Punditry alone cannot hold him. The ghosted column is too small a stage. The England job would be perfect. Or maybe something more mainstream: a Graeme Souness cleans up the streets reality TV vehicle. Take that hood off when you speak to me, son. Want to play rough, do ye? Or perhaps Supergaffer: the extremely tough love approach to parenting. Give your kids the flying teacups one-on-one-in-the-car park treatment. Some people might say ah'm auld-fashioned, but ney-one (NEY-ONE!) takes the pish out of Supergaffer! Well, I'd watch it. Now if we could just do something with that hair.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 22, 2005, 12:05:47 PM
If Souness keeps his job if we lose or draw tomorrow, i will go nuts and question FS position, Whats people gonna do tomorrow if we lose or draw? i aint gonna come home and moan about it on here i expect some sort of action to be made, We could stay in the stadium and chant for Souness out and Hitzfeld in or something!!!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 22, 2005, 01:00:36 PM
Souness and Shepherd will know the feelings of the supporters if we don't win tomorrow, the only get out clause I can see is if we were a couple of goals down until the final minutes then scored a couple of very late goals to draw.

That scenario might might get them out of jail, however, I don't think Freddy needs the crowd to tell him things are not going too well.

If we get beat then something might happen outside of the main entrance although that might not happen as the poilce will want supporters away from the ground as soon as possible.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Dragon55544 on October 22, 2005, 01:09:28 PM
Well if we lose tomorrow what are we gonna do? Chant Hitzfeld or something? Souness cant possible keep his job if we dont win, I hate thinking we'll lose and come monday FS will say he stills backs Souness!!!! FS doesnt want to be known as a chairman who sacks managers, Well i say he needs to get his head out of his own A*se and do whats best for the club and not his image


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 22, 2005, 01:15:26 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 22, 2005, 01:09:28 PM
Well if we lose tomorrow what are we gonna do? Chant Hitzfeld or something? Souness cant possible keep his job if we dont win, I hate thinking we'll lose and come monday FS will say he stills backs Souness!!!! FS doesnt want to be known as a chairman who sacks managers, Well i say he needs to get his head out of his own A*se and do whats best for the club and not his image


Freddys' face against Fulham and Wigan suggests that time isn't something Souness has a lot of.

What will I do if we don't win?  No idea, I'll not just take it and probably will have something to say.

Will I chant Hitzfeld?  Probably, probably a Hitzfeld Wonderland, it's the best I can think of.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on October 22, 2005, 01:17:45 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 22, 2005, 01:09:28 PM
Well if we lose tomorrow what are we gonna do? Chant Hitzfeld or something? Souness cant possible keep his job if we dont win, I hate thinking we'll lose and come monday FS will say he stills backs Souness!!!! FS doesnt want to be known as a chairman who sacks managers, Well i say he needs to get his head out of his own A*se and do whats best for the club and not his image


We've lost to the mackems before, there isn't a lot we can do. If it comes to the worst, just hope it triggers the correct and overdue response from Shepherd. Mind you, even that may not cause the penny to drop for some.



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on October 22, 2005, 03:36:35 PM
Quote from: NE5 on October 22, 2005, 01:17:45 PM
Quote from: Dragon55544 on October 22, 2005, 01:09:28 PM
Well if we lose tomorrow what are we gonna do? Chant Hitzfeld or something? Souness cant possible keep his job if we dont win, I hate thinking we'll lose and come monday FS will say he stills backs Souness!!!! FS doesnt want to be known as a chairman who sacks managers, Well i say he needs to get his head out of his own A*se and do whats best for the club and not his image


We've lost to the mackems before, there isn't a lot we can do. If it comes to the worst, just hope it triggers the correct and overdue response from Shepherd. Mind you, even that may not cause the penny to drop for some.




I'd be totally amazed if it didn't, I'd be outstounded (sorry to whoever it was).


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on December 26, 2005, 05:25:23 PM
Any comments?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: sicko2ndbest on December 26, 2005, 05:28:26 PM
i cannot believe the difference between 2 teams that were very similar when the 2 respective managers took over. Im sorry this isnt down to pure luck. The difference betweeen Benitez and Souness is the same as the difference between carragher and babayaro or even the preverbial chalk and cheese.

Souness is too old fashioned in the way he thinks, believing tactics do not come into the equation as long as the players or 'proper players' do their jobs. The difference between the ball retention of the 2 teams was light years apart. We looked edgy always needing 3-4 touches and normally giving it away whereas liverpool seem to be able to pass and move 1 touch whilst keeping the ball.

We had no clues today, we have not improved a net 30million pounds later Mr Shepard has got to notice this he just must for the sake of NUFC, NUFC PLC, NUFC supporters and his own pockets.

Do the right thing Freddie, and get us a manager worthy of the support we give!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: AlanSkärare on December 26, 2005, 05:36:20 PM
My comment would be he's not able to make this team play consistent. We'll continue to be a mid-table team as long as he's here, because topflight teams dont win one or two games every now and then, they always win, and the get dips sometimes. We always play poor, but because of Owen we sometimes beat the other mid-table teams(including Arsenal), and when we get them in a row, we go on a "rescue greame" -run, thats why he's still here. And that's why I've wanted to see him out since we lost 0-3 to Aston Villa, things like that never happend with Sir Bobby, who did'nt spend £50M...


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on December 26, 2005, 05:44:41 PM
Quote from: AlanSkärare on December 26, 2005, 05:36:20 PM
My comment would be he's not able to make this team play consistent. We'll continue to be a mid-table team as long as he's here, because topflight teams dont win one or two games every now and then, they always win, and the get dips sometimes. We always play poor, but because of Owen we sometimes beat the other mid-table teams(including Arsenal), and when we get them in a row, we go on a "rescue greame" -run, thats why he's still here. And that's why I've wanted to see him out since we lost 0-3 to Aston Villa, things like that never happend with Sir Bobby, who did'nt spend £50M...


We are consistent under Souness, only for the wrong reason, consistently crap.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Shearer9 on December 26, 2005, 05:45:37 PM
Bobby's teams never capitulated like Souness' do, say what you will about dressing room spirit.  So many gutless and passionless performances have plagued this team, it's disgusting to watch.  Never would have happened with SBR here.  Perhaps Bellamy and Robert were shitebags, but at least they had some idea of how to play football.  There may be good team spirit, but everyone just totally gives up because there's no way they can play together.  It's just useless running around whenever they try and do anything. 


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on December 26, 2005, 06:02:09 PM
Quote from: Shearer9 on December 26, 2005, 05:45:37 PM
Bobby's teams never capitulated like Souness' do, say what you will about dressing room spirit.  So many gutless and passionless performances have plagued this team, it's disgusting to watch.  Never would have happened with SBR here.  Perhaps Bellamy and Robert were shitebags, but at least they had some idea of how to play football.  There may be good team spirit, but everyone just totally gives up because there's no way they can play together.  It's just useless running around whenever they try and do anything. 


Bellamy in particular showed spirit where it matters most, on the pitch, and when it mattered too, as those who saw regularly him would testify [well, those who were so weak they couldn't stick by their own opinions and allowed themselves to be taken in by Souness' lies instead]



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on December 26, 2005, 06:03:56 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 08:11:10 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on October 21, 2005, 05:13:05 PM
Brilliant last few pages, Omar. Brilliant.

Twas' I who said that Parker is average. I hold that opinion because I believe he's had one good season at Charlton and that's all he's done. If he goes on to prove me wrong for us I'll admit it, but he has a long way to go.

I'm not NE5 and I'm not LM.

Cheers Omar. Keep it up, you're a scream.


Oh shut-up you tart!


who resurrected this thread .... LOL



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on December 26, 2005, 06:06:16 PM
Is anybody going to say why we should keep Souness?


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on December 26, 2005, 06:06:54 PM
Quote from: NE5 on December 26, 2005, 06:03:56 PM
Quote from: 10.Omardinho on October 21, 2005, 08:11:10 PM
Quote from: Howaythelads on October 21, 2005, 05:13:05 PM
Brilliant last few pages, Omar. Brilliant.

Twas' I who said that Parker is average. I hold that opinion because I believe he's had one good season at Charlton and that's all he's done. If he goes on to prove me wrong for us I'll admit it, but he has a long way to go.

I'm not NE5 and I'm not LM.

Cheers Omar. Keep it up, you're a scream.


Oh shut-up you tart!


who resurrected this thread .... LOL




I'll give you one guess.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: AlanSkärare on December 26, 2005, 06:09:46 PM
I'd like to see todays team being 1-3 down at Elland road 4 years ago, and turn it into 4-3. Maybe Souness can get Bowyer fighting and Faye running, but he cant give the team anything that would turn a game like this around. His ideas of football arent very functional these days( i know it has been said 10 000 times), and todays performance was a brilliant example. He can't blame injuries today either.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Ankdh on December 26, 2005, 07:10:32 PM
So just to clarify the board's position... there is no one here who wants to keep Souness? [Ozzie and Obi aside, oooof course]


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on December 26, 2005, 07:14:39 PM
Quote from: Ankdh on December 26, 2005, 07:10:32 PM
So just to clarify the board's position... there is no one here who wants to keep Souness? [Ozzie and Obi aside, oooof course]


there are 1 or 2 others, macca888 for one considers Keegan to have been such an abject failure, that even Souness will be more successful, or leaving presumably a better group of players ........

Souness is a clown, his track record bears it out, and yet still some bury their heads in the sand




Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Ankdh on December 26, 2005, 07:22:29 PM
Quote from: NE5 on December 26, 2005, 07:14:39 PM
there are 1 or 2 others, macca888 for one considers Keegan to have been such an abject failure, that even Souness will be more successful, or leaving presumably a better group of players ........

Souness is a clown, his track record bears it out, and yet still some bury their heads in the sand



Everyone's entitled to their opinion I suppose... but they're wrong ;)


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Living Legend on December 26, 2005, 07:27:22 PM
I have a theory, just a theory, but may make sense.

Shepherd won't sack Souness, because he knows that nobody would join managerless team in January. So he keeps Souness till the signings are made and then sacks him. Maybe O'Nell takes over, who knows.

But it would make sense. If we sack Souness now, nobody wants to join us (it's better to have shite manager than no manager at all when choosing clubs).

And after signings are made, Souness can go.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Martin Jol on December 26, 2005, 07:45:37 PM
Quote from: Living Legend on December 26, 2005, 07:27:22 PM
I have a theory, just a theory, but may make sense.

Shepherd won't sack Souness, because he knows that nobody would join managerless team in January. So he keeps Souness till the signings are made and then sacks him. Maybe O'Nell takes over, who knows.

But it would make sense. If we sack Souness now, nobody wants to join us (it's better to have shite manager than no manager at all when choosing clubs).

And after signings are made, Souness can go.


And when the new manager comes in, the first job he'll be doing is getting rid of all the players that Souness signed and he doesn't want!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on December 26, 2005, 07:48:05 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on December 26, 2005, 07:45:37 PM
And when the new manager comes in, the first job he'll be doing is getting rid of all the players that Souness signed and he doesn't want!


Some of them need to go so a new man getting rid of a few wouldn't be a bad thing as long as they were replaced by players of a higher standard.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Living Legend on December 26, 2005, 08:05:49 PM
Quote from: Martin Jol on December 26, 2005, 07:45:37 PM
And when the new manager comes in, the first job he'll be doing is getting rid of all the players that Souness signed and he doesn't want!


No, you missed the point.

Freddy will do the signings. I don't think Souness has much to say about them anyway.

Freddy will get rid of likes of Bowyer, althought Souness doesn't want to. I think January will be like preparing for new manager. No shite signings, just few good.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: binnsy on December 26, 2005, 08:19:24 PM
Souness has now been here for nearly one and half seasons and i still haven't got a clue what the tactics and gameplan are that NUFC now use.  At least under Bobby you knew(most of the time) that we'd get the ball down, play it out wide to Robert or Nobby and crosses would be coming over for Shearer or we'd exploit the pace of Bellamy or Dyer with a ball over the top to stretch teams.  We also had a threat from set pieces and we'd use the aerial threat of big Al, Speed and Dabizas.  Under Souness i'm just baffled,  apparently on arrival he announced he was a 442 man,  but then said he doesn't do wingers! 
Another thing that has happened under the Souness regime that gets me scratching my head is why does he drag EVERY single player back into our 18 yard box when we are defending a corner?  Straight away Souness rules out the possibility of a breakaway goal.  If you stick 2 players up on the half way line then automatically the opposition will leave 3 men back,  Chelsea stick 3 up front! 

I've laughed at Souness recently when in interviews he's said we've went for a more direct approach with the players we have available,  that was said after both the Arsenal and Wes Ham games,  Owen missed the first and played the 2nd but i saw nothing different to virtually any other previous game,  apart from we got stuck in more against Arsenal.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: The Fox on December 26, 2005, 08:30:32 PM
There is absolutely no reason to kep him and all those Souness supporters should hide away until he's gone.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on December 26, 2005, 08:45:50 PM
Quote from: Ankdh on December 26, 2005, 07:10:32 PM
So just to clarify the board's position... there is no one here who wants to keep Souness? [Ozzie and Obi aside, oooof course]


Please don't presume to represent my position. You're about as likely to understand it as NE5 (ie not very likely at all).


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on December 26, 2005, 08:47:26 PM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on December 26, 2005, 08:45:50 PM
Please don't presume to represent my position. You're about as likely to understand it as NE5 (ie not very likely at all).


correct. I don't understand why anyone still supports Souness



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Alan Shearer 9 on December 26, 2005, 08:49:20 PM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on December 26, 2005, 08:45:50 PM
Please don't presume to represent my position. You're about as likely to understand it as NE5 (ie not very likely at all).


DON'T JUDGE ME BITCH! I AM WHAT I AMMMM!!!!  gay.gif


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Haswell on December 26, 2005, 09:00:44 PM
Souness will stay.


Or,


Steve Bruce.      Wince.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Alan Shearer 9 on December 26, 2005, 09:05:24 PM
Quote from: Haswell on December 26, 2005, 09:00:44 PM
Souness will stay.


Or,


Steve Bruce.       Wince.


don't be ****ing daft


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Ankdh on December 27, 2005, 01:39:52 AM
Quote from: Alan Shearer 9 on December 26, 2005, 08:49:20 PM
DON'T JUDGE ME BITCH! I AM WHAT I AMMMM!!!! gay.gif


bluelaugh.gif


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Jpfin on December 27, 2005, 07:35:18 AM
Quote from: binnsy on December 26, 2005, 08:19:24 PM
Souness has now been here for nearly one and half seasons and i still haven't got a clue what the tactics and gameplan are that NUFC now use.  At least under Bobby you knew(most of the time) that we'd get the ball down, play it out wide to Robert or Nobby and crosses would be coming over for Shearer or we'd exploit the pace of Bellamy or Dyer with a ball over the top to stretch teams.  We also had a threat from set pieces and we'd use the aerial threat of big Al, Speed and Dabizas.   Under Souness i'm just baffled,  apparently on arrival he announced he was a 442 man,  but then said he doesn't do wingers! 
Another thing that has happened under the Souness regime that gets me scratching my head is why does he drag EVERY single player back into our 18 yard box when we are defending a corner?  Straight away Souness rules out the possibility of a breakaway goal.  If you stick 2 players up on the half way line then automatically the opposition will leave 3 men back,  Chelsea stick 3 up front! 

I've laughed at Souness recently when in interviews he's said we've went for a more direct approach with the players we have available,  that was said after both the Arsenal and Wes Ham games,  Owen missed the first and played the 2nd but i saw nothing different to virtually any other previous game,  apart from we got stuck in more against Arsenal.


i agree with this post.
but who wouldnt? bluecool.gif


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: toonelaide on December 27, 2005, 07:42:44 AM
Quote from: NE5 on December 26, 2005, 08:47:26 PM
correct. I don't understand why anyone still supports Souness




There are some people who, while not necessarily supporting Souness believe that we shouldn't change managers unless a certain criteria can be met:

1) The next manager will perform significantly better than the incumbent
2) The change of management is good for the long time benefit of the club, in this case the sacking of a manager mid season may not be good long term as it will make the club look trigger happy and concern many candidates for the position


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Ankdh on December 27, 2005, 08:09:58 AM
That's more to do with the timing of the end of Souness' tenure IMO.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: OzzieMandias on December 27, 2005, 08:10:09 AM
Quote from: toonelaide on December 27, 2005, 07:42:44 AM
There are some people who, while not necessarily supporting Souness believe that we shouldn't change managers unless a certain criteria can be met:

1) The next manager will perform significantly better than the incumbent
2) The change of management is good for the long time benefit of the club, in this case the sacking of a manager mid season may not be good long term as it will make the club look trigger happy and concern many candidates for the position


Your ability to see the bigger picture will win you few friends among the "anyone at all would be better than Souness so we might as well kill him yesterday" contingent.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: The Fox on December 27, 2005, 09:23:49 AM
Amazingly there are still people who cant see the wood for the trees and support Souness. These people deserve what they get, uninspired performances that border on the ludicrous.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on December 27, 2005, 10:45:09 AM
Quote from: toonelaide on December 27, 2005, 07:42:44 AM
There are some people who, while not necessarily supporting Souness believe that we shouldn't change managers unless a certain criteria can be met:

1) The next manager will perform significantly better than the incumbent
2) The change of management is good for the long time benefit of the club, in this case the sacking of a manager mid season may not be good long term as it will make the club look trigger happy and concern many candidates for the position


Point 1 is true and should always be the case, it wasn't the last time we were after a manager.

Point 2, getting a trigger happy reputation is irrelevant if you get point 1 right.  Who would be bothered if we got a world class manager while picking up this reputation?

I certainly wouldn't be bothered in the slightest, it would be better than the reputation we seem to have now as being a laughing stock.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on December 27, 2005, 11:49:49 AM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on December 27, 2005, 08:10:09 AM
Your ability to see the bigger picture will win you few friends among the "anyone at all would be better than Souness so we might as well kill him yesterday" contingent.


shame we didn't bin him last year like some of us  said, for almost anyone ..... even a temp while we looked aroound and researched the proper candidates

there is no such thing as the wrong time to sack the wrong manager, what matters - in fact the only thing that matters - is getting the right man.

What will you say if Souness is sacked in the summer, by which time the man who could be the right one for us [whoever it is] has gone somewhere else



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: toonelaide on December 27, 2005, 02:22:50 PM
Quote from: Mick on December 27, 2005, 10:45:09 AM
Point 1 is true and should always be the case, it wasn't the last time we were after a manager.

Point 2, getting a trigger happy reputation is irrelevant if you get point 1 right.  Who would be bothered if we got a world class manager while picking up this reputation?

I certainly wouldn't be bothered in the slightest, it would be better than the reputation we seem to have now as being a laughing stock.


Fair point. I suspect though that world class managers are more likely to be joining new clubs at the end of the season, so they have time to teach the players how to play the way they want.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on December 27, 2005, 05:15:57 PM
Quote from: toonelaide on December 27, 2005, 02:22:50 PM
Fair point. I suspect though that world class managers are more likely to be joining new clubs at the end of the season, so they have time to teach the players how to play the way they want.


I can see benefits in both joining now and joining later, joining now allows the manager to evaluate his staff before the summer transfer window.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: toonelaide on December 27, 2005, 05:20:29 PM
I suppose it's every managers choice, Le Guen seems happy to talk to clubs now, but Hitzfield seems set on not returning till next season


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Xabi_Alonso on December 27, 2005, 05:24:28 PM
If you get Souness out then wouldn't any of you get bored with maybe not having something to moan about every week?

In fairness though due to your fans and the support (financially) of Shepherd, you are deserving of a better manager.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: ticaL on December 27, 2005, 05:27:36 PM
Keep him, he has a sexy face! and is definately not a racist...

(https://img244.imageshack.us/img244/8254/souness5ep.jpg)


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Paully on December 27, 2005, 05:47:28 PM
Quote from: binnsy on December 26, 2005, 08:19:24 PM
Souness has now been here for nearly one and half seasons and i still haven't got a clue what the tactics and gameplan are that NUFC now use.  At least under Bobby you knew(most of the time) that we'd get the ball down, play it out wide to Robert or Nobby and crosses would be coming over for Shearer or we'd exploit the pace of Bellamy or Dyer with a ball over the top to stretch teams.  We also had a threat from set pieces and we'd use the aerial threat of big Al, Speed and Dabizas.   Under Souness i'm just baffled,  apparently on arrival he announced he was a 442 man,  but then said he doesn't do wingers! 
Another thing that has happened under the Souness regime that gets me scratching my head is why does he drag EVERY single player back into our 18 yard box when we are defending a corner?  Straight away Souness rules out the possibility of a breakaway goal.  If you stick 2 players up on the half way line then automatically the opposition will leave 3 men back,  Chelsea stick 3 up front! 

I've laughed at Souness recently when in interviews he's said we've went for a more direct approach with the players we have available,  that was said after both the Arsenal and Wes Ham games,  Owen missed the first and played the 2nd but i saw nothing different to virtually any other previous game,  apart from we got stuck in more against Arsenal.


Great post there mate, spot on, we're only going 1 way with him in charge. I've made me feelings known here;

https://www.true-faith.co.uk/html/Matches/Reports/ReportLiverpool_a.htm



Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: Mick on December 27, 2005, 05:55:10 PM
Quote from: Xabi_Alonso on December 27, 2005, 05:24:28 PM
If you get Souness out then wouldn't any of you get bored with maybe not having something to moan about every week?

In fairness though due to your fans and the support (financially) of Shepherd, you are deserving of a better manager.


No we wouldn't get bored, we'd just talk about the good football we could expect during our next match.


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: 3-1 NYD on December 27, 2005, 07:13:29 PM
Quote from: OzzieMandias on December 26, 2005, 08:45:50 PM
Please don't presume to represent my position. You're about as likely to understand it as NE5 (ie not very likely at all).

Too right Ozzie son, we love Souey cos' he got rid of the cancerous one!


Title: Re: Why Keep Souness?
Post by: NE5 on December 27, 2005, 07:16:12 PM
Quote from: 3-1 NYD on December 27, 2005, 07:13:29 PM
Too right Ozzie son, we love Souey cos' he got rid of the cancerous one!


results, results, it's all about results....I wouldn't expect a mackem WUM to want NUFC to get good results




NUFC Forum | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.