|
Title: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 21, 2006, 02:47:37 PM ignoring the cost, which is moot considering the question
does the UK need a further nuclear deterrent, beyond 2020, the expiration date of Trident? bearing in mind that: 1. Trident is the only active UK nuclear weapon 2. Trident is now equipped for 'flexible response' allowing anything from pinpoint low-yield single warhead response to full strategic strike capability 3. development for a replacement must start in the next few years, any delay could result in a 'window of vulnerability' Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: 80 on November 21, 2006, 03:38:54 PM Can you imagine the loss of nuclear deterrents allied to the end of the Union? Might as well pack up and go home.
Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Redcar Mag on November 21, 2006, 06:38:19 PM What was wrong with Polaris? Wasn't it nucleary enough? I don't understand why weapons need shoot-by dates.
Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 21, 2006, 07:49:55 PM Quote from: Redcar Mag on November 21, 2006, 06:38:19 PM What was wrong with Polaris? Wasn't it nucleary enough? I don't understand why weapons need shoot-by dates. it's not the weapons, it's the great big rusty holes in the submarines that are the problem Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: indigoon on November 21, 2006, 11:29:57 PM Can't we just pretend we have nukes and spend the money on something good instead?
That's probably what we do any way. Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 22, 2006, 09:33:39 AM we can fire nuclear tipped cruise missiles and the RN and the Airforce still have Nuclear bombs and depth charges that are refurbed near Reading every so often........................
Practically no-one ever gives up a weapon so it looks as if we're stuck with it the fact it never stopped Osama or the Argies in the Falklands is of course irrelevant (cough cough) Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Redcar Mag on November 22, 2006, 11:01:53 AM Quote from: Invicta_Toon on November 21, 2006, 07:49:55 PM Quote from: Redcar Mag on November 21, 2006, 06:38:19 PM What was wrong with Polaris? Wasn't it nucleary enough? I don't understand why weapons need shoot-by dates. it's not the weapons, it's the great big rusty holes in the submarines that are the problem Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 22, 2006, 11:58:22 AM Ah but we have to build new ones every so often to keep the jobs in Barrow
Same as spending money at Aldermaston - if we don't pay them they might all bugger off to Iran or somewhere Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 22, 2006, 02:15:34 PM Quote from: Rob W on November 22, 2006, 09:33:39 AM we can fire nuclear tipped cruise missiles and the RN and the Airforce still have Nuclear bombs and depth charges that are refurbed near Reading every so often........................ Practically no-one ever gives up a weapon so it looks as if we're stuck with it the fact it never stopped Osama or the Argies in the Falklands is of course irrelevant (cough cough) we don't own the cruise missiles the air force don't have any strategic bombers anymore the bombs would take weeks to re-enter service, and IIRC are to be decommissioned under non-proliferation treaties Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 22, 2006, 06:09:19 PM we don't own the Trident Missiles either - we "rent" them from the USN - we do own the subs tho'
the bombs are kept "live" at several places - not as many as they used to have but .... and a Tornado can get to a lot of places with airborne refueling or using Cyprus for example Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 22, 2006, 06:27:32 PM Quote from: Rob W on November 22, 2006, 06:09:19 PM we don't own the Trident Missiles either - we "rent" them from the USN - we do own the subs tho' the bombs are kept "live" at several places - not as many as they used to have but .... and a Tornado can get to a lot of places with airborne refueling or using Cyprus for example compare the Tornado flight time and the flight time of a missile... and the tridents are in our possession and usable right now, IIRC we have to ask the US for the cruises. The differenc being the trident missile body is rented, the warhead is UK owned, wheras the cruise warhead and missile are US of course the bombs are live, but they aren't currently deployable in a short space of time, as per our treaty agreements Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 23, 2006, 07:43:40 AM Its never been made clear if we have all the codes to launch the Tridents without US permission
I suspect the Yanks have a way of ensuring they are NOT launched without their permission Delivery time is only important if you are looking at a First Strike "beheading" scenario as we did in the Cold War - if we want to bomb Tehran for example they can fire a missile or two at us but they can't take out all our strike forces - the Tornadoes can turn up a couple of hours later and it makes no difference TBH Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 23, 2006, 12:49:21 PM so you get an intel report of an imminent Iranian launch in the next 30...
what use are Tornado's then? Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 24, 2006, 11:34:27 AM what use is Trident then?
Unless they have several hundred missiles they can't "behead" the UK armed forces A cruise missile or a Tornado will get to Tehran - but as Sir Humphrey said "Prime Minister, we HAVE to have Polaris!! There are other weapons systems but if you are buying deterrents Polaris is the one that Marks and Spencers would sell!" Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 24, 2006, 11:36:24 AM Trident is both a strategic and tactical weapon now...
Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 24, 2006, 11:40:07 AM TACTICAL???
What are they going to do - put HE warheads on it? Even without any warhead its 6 ft across and weighs 60+ tons.................... get one of those through yer front door and you'd think it was Strategic Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 24, 2006, 11:42:23 AM read the top post again man :roll:
Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 24, 2006, 12:06:30 PM "pinpoint" and "low yield"
WOW!!! almost not do any harm to anyone then................................... Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 24, 2006, 01:39:40 PM compared to the other end of the scale...
Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 24, 2006, 02:17:16 PM which is one of the advantages of BIG H Bombs - you don't have to accurate at all
Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Invicta_Toon on November 24, 2006, 02:20:41 PM well there's accurate and there's postcodes
I would prefer to know where the centre will be tbh Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 24, 2006, 05:12:25 PM With 55MT you'd get everything within 100 kms
Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: chicago_shearer on November 25, 2006, 02:31:53 AM Quote from: Rob W on November 22, 2006, 09:33:39 AM we can fire nuclear tipped cruise missiles and the RN and the Airforce still have Nuclear bombs and depth charges that are refurbed near Reading every so often........................ Practically no-one ever gives up a weapon so it looks as if we're stuck with it the fact it never stopped Osama or the Argies in the Falklands is of course irrelevant (cough cough) I thought the bombs were out of service completely? And even if they were still around, they are certainly not tactical weapons. Title: Re: Trident Missile Post by: Rob W on November 26, 2006, 10:31:01 AM I don't think they are on issue but I hadn't heard that they'd been totally dismantled either
Ask Brock to run around to that place near Reading where they make the bloody things to check..............
NUFC Forum | Powered by SMF 1.0.9.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved. |