<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mid-table blues.</title>
	<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/</link>
	<description>Giving NUFC fans a voice</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: A.K. Dholakia</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25638</link>
		<author>A.K. Dholakia</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25638</guid>
		<description>Excellent article and sentiments, Kitman. Really. 

Allardyce is underplaying his hand, and is not playing to the club's/squad's strengths IMO. Given that we are not in any danger as such [of losing or winning anything!], now, for me, would be the time to gamble tactically by nurturing players like N'Zogbia in their best position and blooding Enrique so he can adapt to the league while nothing is riding on it.

Just one other thing: I don't entirely understand the argument presented that the most successful clubs all have managers who have been there a long time. Both Liverpool and Chelsea chop and change [comparatively regularly], and Arsenal and Man Utd don't change -because- they have top-class managers, not on principle! You stick with managers that evince a higher calibre of management. If a manager is still making poor tactical substitutions a year into his tenure, the only reason he shouldn't be dealt with swiftly is if only Roeder or Souness are on the marker as replacement managers.

I understand stability and time is needed to gel, but an intransigent, idiotic tactician who is still an intransigent, idiotic tactician a year into his job [maybe even less] will still be holding the club back in 10, 15 or 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article and sentiments, Kitman. Really. </p>
<p>Allardyce is underplaying his hand, and is not playing to the club&#8217;s/squad&#8217;s strengths IMO. Given that we are not in any danger as such [of losing or winning anything!], now, for me, would be the time to gamble tactically by nurturing players like N&#8217;Zogbia in their best position and blooding Enrique so he can adapt to the league while nothing is riding on it.</p>
<p>Just one other thing: I don&#8217;t entirely understand the argument presented that the most successful clubs all have managers who have been there a long time. Both Liverpool and Chelsea chop and change [comparatively regularly], and Arsenal and Man Utd don&#8217;t change -because- they have top-class managers, not on principle! You stick with managers that evince a higher calibre of management. If a manager is still making poor tactical substitutions a year into his tenure, the only reason he shouldn&#8217;t be dealt with swiftly is if only Roeder or Souness are on the marker as replacement managers.</p>
<p>I understand stability and time is needed to gel, but an intransigent, idiotic tactician who is still an intransigent, idiotic tactician a year into his job [maybe even less] will still be holding the club back in 10, 15 or 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitman</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25560</link>
		<author>Kitman</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25560</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments guys

CL - re your first point, what you're describing is what a relegation threatened team does - keep it tight at the back and nick a goal, and try to get up the table but not losing.  

Personally I don't mind us doing that against the better sides but teams at the bottom like Sunderland, Derby, Fulham etc?  I think we should show more ambition than that against weaker opposition.

Also, I'd question Sam's credentials as a man to deliver clean sheets.  I haven't looked at the stats but weren't Bolton actually not that good at keeping out the opposition?  That was my impression.  In addition to which, if he persists on playing Butt and Geremi, I don't think we've got the personnel to deliver clean sheets - our midfield regularly exposes our defence too much by giving the ball away and not getting back quick enough to cover.  A better team than Fulham will punish us when our play breaks down.  If we're going to play this way we need to keep hold of the ball far better imo.

I follow your argument CL but I'm not sure if the strategy will work without better defensive midfielders than we have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments guys</p>
<p>CL - re your first point, what you&#8217;re describing is what a relegation threatened team does - keep it tight at the back and nick a goal, and try to get up the table but not losing.  </p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t mind us doing that against the better sides but teams at the bottom like Sunderland, Derby, Fulham etc?  I think we should show more ambition than that against weaker opposition.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;d question Sam&#8217;s credentials as a man to deliver clean sheets.  I haven&#8217;t looked at the stats but weren&#8217;t Bolton actually not that good at keeping out the opposition?  That was my impression.  In addition to which, if he persists on playing Butt and Geremi, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve got the personnel to deliver clean sheets - our midfield regularly exposes our defence too much by giving the ball away and not getting back quick enough to cover.  A better team than Fulham will punish us when our play breaks down.  If we&#8217;re going to play this way we need to keep hold of the ball far better imo.</p>
<p>I follow your argument CL but I&#8217;m not sure if the strategy will work without better defensive midfielders than we have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CL</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25549</link>
		<author>CL</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25549</guid>
		<description>I can agree with some of what your all are saying, but not all. First of all I agree with that some of the tactics that BSA are using from time to time is extremely questionable but not all. If you look at the Fulham game, we all agree with that it was one most boring games in the premiership so far this season. But look at it this way. We have a crappy away record and we are now hopefully coming back from an incredible slump. I think Sam was thinking like this. Let´s try to create some stability within the team, the best way to do that is to keep a clean sheet. Build from behind as they say. God knows that one thing Newcastle has lacked for many many years now is stability in the defence. Given has been for far to many years now a one man defence.
Well back to my point. What Newcastle should do for the next couple of games now is to focus on just that, keeping a clean sheet. And that might be extremely boring. But only good can come from that. And if that means there will be several 0-0 games for us to watch, then fine by me. I am sick and tired of loosing games with three or up to four goals as we did under Souness and Roeder.
And after that, when we start keeping clean sheets and when we´d managed to get a solid back four. (We for once actually have the players to create just that.) We will be able to look up, not just on the pitch but on the table.

Second, I agree with you all that we need a creative player on the midfield. But I fully understand Chris Mort. Fat Freddie left the club with huge debts and i can understand that Mr. Ashley doesn´t want to spend more money than he already have on the club. So a big name I think is out of the question. And let´s face it, what good have big name signings done us in the past. 
What we need to do is to find our own Elano. Someone who is a great player but isn´t a big name who comes for the big paycheck, because for what other reason would he come to Newcastle? Maybe because of the big games in Europe that we play so often. Come on let´s face it. 

This area is somewhere I trust Big Sam. We all know that he has great insight in the transfer market and is extremly good at getting good players cheap. Maybe Arsahvin who knows but as Big Sam keep on saying we need quality players.  

So my point is let´s give Sam some time and hopefully we manage to get a European spot for next season and if things are looking the same a year from now which hopefully they don´t. Then let´s get someone else!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can agree with some of what your all are saying, but not all. First of all I agree with that some of the tactics that BSA are using from time to time is extremely questionable but not all. If you look at the Fulham game, we all agree with that it was one most boring games in the premiership so far this season. But look at it this way. We have a crappy away record and we are now hopefully coming back from an incredible slump. I think Sam was thinking like this. Let´s try to create some stability within the team, the best way to do that is to keep a clean sheet. Build from behind as they say. God knows that one thing Newcastle has lacked for many many years now is stability in the defence. Given has been for far to many years now a one man defence.<br />
Well back to my point. What Newcastle should do for the next couple of games now is to focus on just that, keeping a clean sheet. And that might be extremely boring. But only good can come from that. And if that means there will be several 0-0 games for us to watch, then fine by me. I am sick and tired of loosing games with three or up to four goals as we did under Souness and Roeder.<br />
And after that, when we start keeping clean sheets and when we´d managed to get a solid back four. (We for once actually have the players to create just that.) We will be able to look up, not just on the pitch but on the table.</p>
<p>Second, I agree with you all that we need a creative player on the midfield. But I fully understand Chris Mort. Fat Freddie left the club with huge debts and i can understand that Mr. Ashley doesn´t want to spend more money than he already have on the club. So a big name I think is out of the question. And let´s face it, what good have big name signings done us in the past.<br />
What we need to do is to find our own Elano. Someone who is a great player but isn´t a big name who comes for the big paycheck, because for what other reason would he come to Newcastle? Maybe because of the big games in Europe that we play so often. Come on let´s face it. </p>
<p>This area is somewhere I trust Big Sam. We all know that he has great insight in the transfer market and is extremly good at getting good players cheap. Maybe Arsahvin who knows but as Big Sam keep on saying we need quality players.  </p>
<p>So my point is let´s give Sam some time and hopefully we manage to get a European spot for next season and if things are looking the same a year from now which hopefully they don´t. Then let´s get someone else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25540</link>
		<author>Adam</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25540</guid>
		<description>Firstly good article. Yes at the moment we are not playing the most attractive football but i think Derby on sunday well show just how good we are against well already doomed and poor quality opposition. This gives the team an opportunity to show good..attacking football unlike the mediocre display on saturday and win comfortably by at least 2 goals. My only fear is that BSA loses the plot and we go down 1-0 like that horrible night last season against sheffield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly good article. Yes at the moment we are not playing the most attractive football but i think Derby on sunday well show just how good we are against well already doomed and poor quality opposition. This gives the team an opportunity to show good..attacking football unlike the mediocre display on saturday and win comfortably by at least 2 goals. My only fear is that BSA loses the plot and we go down 1-0 like that horrible night last season against sheffield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25536</link>
		<author>Benny</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25536</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article Kitman, I'm also an exiled Geordie at the moment living in Latvia. Like you I'm watching the games remotely but seem to be of the same opinion as you and most of the others. I think Sam has managed to turn around what is going to be a repetitive situation unless we give him some substantial funds to bring in real class in January and the summer. 

It reads that Chris Mort has already cleared the ground for a January window of little activity on our behalf. That coupled with six weeks minus four first team regulars I think we are about as high as we are going to get. The worrying thing is all the teams around us seem to be prepared to continue investing in players which can only increase the gap between ourselves and the teams around and above us.

Personally I don't think Sam is the right man for us but if we have to stick with him give him some kitty to compete for some class that we are desperate for.

1-0 on Saturday for me, 91st minute winner off someones hoop...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article Kitman, I&#8217;m also an exiled Geordie at the moment living in Latvia. Like you I&#8217;m watching the games remotely but seem to be of the same opinion as you and most of the others. I think Sam has managed to turn around what is going to be a repetitive situation unless we give him some substantial funds to bring in real class in January and the summer. </p>
<p>It reads that Chris Mort has already cleared the ground for a January window of little activity on our behalf. That coupled with six weeks minus four first team regulars I think we are about as high as we are going to get. The worrying thing is all the teams around us seem to be prepared to continue investing in players which can only increase the gap between ourselves and the teams around and above us.</p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t think Sam is the right man for us but if we have to stick with him give him some kitty to compete for some class that we are desperate for.</p>
<p>1-0 on Saturday for me, 91st minute winner off someones hoop&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Black</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25526</link>
		<author>Mr Black</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25526</guid>
		<description>Does playing ugly actually increase our chances of winning anything? 

The problem with adopting a 'winning is all that matters' approach is what happens if you don’t win. Not winning something is bad, not winning something and playing garbage football is far worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does playing ugly actually increase our chances of winning anything? </p>
<p>The problem with adopting a &#8216;winning is all that matters&#8217; approach is what happens if you don’t win. Not winning something is bad, not winning something and playing garbage football is far worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattypnufc</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25501</link>
		<author>mattypnufc</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25501</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I'd rather win something with little or no flair in our team, grind out wins &#38; draws week in week out, and then finally build on those foundations than play with excitement and brilliant football and lose.  

We have a transitional period going on at the club, we are finally feeling we are moving in the correct direction.  

Yes we need a playmaker in midfield and yes BSA has played some quite strange tactics, but not one person who watched our last 3 performances (before Fulham) and could not say that we look a far better 'more up for it' team than last season.  

I just hope we give Sam time...all this chopping and changing has not worked.  Look at Manure &#38; TheArse (OK Wenger won trophies in his first season) but stability is what is needed right now, not bloody knee jerk reactions.

Boring football is not what we want to watch, but I'll bloody put up with it if it means we win a trophy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I&#8217;d rather win something with little or no flair in our team, grind out wins &amp; draws week in week out, and then finally build on those foundations than play with excitement and brilliant football and lose.  </p>
<p>We have a transitional period going on at the club, we are finally feeling we are moving in the correct direction.  </p>
<p>Yes we need a playmaker in midfield and yes BSA has played some quite strange tactics, but not one person who watched our last 3 performances (before Fulham) and could not say that we look a far better &#8216;more up for it&#8217; team than last season.  </p>
<p>I just hope we give Sam time&#8230;all this chopping and changing has not worked.  Look at Manure &amp; TheArse (OK Wenger won trophies in his first season) but stability is what is needed right now, not bloody knee jerk reactions.</p>
<p>Boring football is not what we want to watch, but I&#8217;ll bloody put up with it if it means we win a trophy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25495</link>
		<author>Matthew</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25495</guid>
		<description>Well, we don't need a "name"... Just someone who can pass a ball forwards ideally.....

And isn't Motta just an average anchor man who can't get in Barce's "B" team? Surely we have enough distinctly average centre midfielders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we don&#8217;t need a &#8220;name&#8221;&#8230; Just someone who can pass a ball forwards ideally&#8230;..</p>
<p>And isn&#8217;t Motta just an average anchor man who can&#8217;t get in Barce&#8217;s &#8220;B&#8221; team? Surely we have enough distinctly average centre midfielders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave A</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25461</link>
		<author>Dave A</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25461</guid>
		<description>So,we need a playmaker AND a name, according to Mike A? Hell, just splash the cash and get Thiago Motta from Barca!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So,we need a playmaker AND a name, according to Mike A? Hell, just splash the cash and get Thiago Motta from Barca!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25426</link>
		<author>Matthew</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newcastle-online.com/2007/12/18/mid-table-blues/#comment-25426</guid>
		<description>Rafael Van Der Vart would be a good one.... And attainable in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafael Van Der Vart would be a good one&#8230;. And attainable in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
